Which of these, if any, do you prefer?
Photographed the first several times in recent years, and it looks quite different. Don't believe I've been to the other. The first two appear to be scans from old film, possibly the last pair as well. That process isn't often kind to photos.
shieldsadvert wrote:
Which of these, if any, do you prefer?
In general like them all. But 1 and 3 most. I usually prefer B/W on this type of shot, but lean towards #3 for color. If possible I would remove pole in center foreground. To me it is a distraction. In #1 it is different perspective and pole off to right.
#1 is the most appealing to me in terms of composition. Could be even better in color; would have to compare.
joecichjr
Loc: Chicago S. Suburbs, Illinois, USA
shieldsadvert wrote:
Which of these, if any, do you prefer?
Prefer the color due to greater depth
๐๐งก๐งก๐
If I had to select one it would be the last one with correction of the perspective and converted to monochrome.
I like the color photos better. #3
My preference always seems to gravitate toward color, however all your photos are technically well done.
Very good set, I like #1 the best.
Las Trampas looks a little tired. A beautiful place. Hope they have the means to keep it in good shape. Rancho de Taos is in top shape. Do you have any photos of its more famous backside so to speak? I like the b&w of Trampas best.
Appy
Loc: Flint Hills (Ks)
Last one looks like the setting for an old Clint Eastwood movie.
I agree about editing out the black post in the #3 image.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.