Sadly everything in Texas is an opinion, nothing there seems to be based on facts or reality. Why o why?
lamiaceae wrote:
Sadly everything in Texas is an opinion, nothing there seems to be based on facts or reality. Why o why?
All the bulls there? (Along with their <ahem!> by-products?)
--Rich
lamiaceae wrote:
Sadly everything in Texas is an opinion, nothing there seems to be based on facts or reality. Why o why?
And a Californian is saying that?
Time for an oil change!
Jerry, your snip could be mis-understood, and your link requires subscription. A more accurate story would include:
"During the conversations with teachers during last week's meeting, the comments made were in no way to convey that the Holocaust was anything less than a terrible event in history. Additionally, we recognize there are not two sides of the Holocaust.
"As we continue to work through implementation of HB 3979, we also understand this bill does not require an opposing viewpoint on historical facts. As a district we will work to add clarity to our expectations for teachers and once again apologize for any hurt or confusion this has caused."
At the heart of the incident is confusion over the law which limits conversations about race and history in schools.
HB 3979 in Texas, which was signed by Gov. Greg Abbott and took effect on September 1, states that a teacher may not be compelled to discuss "a particular current event or widely debated and currently controversial issue of public policy or social affairs."
If a teacher does engage in that kind of discussion, the teacher is required to "explore such issues from diverse and contending perspectives without giving deference to any one perspective."
bodiebill wrote:
And a Californian is saying that?
Time for an oil change!
I said sadly. I wish it were not so in TX. I even have had a few friends from there. Most left for various reasons.
lamiaceae wrote:
I said sadly. I wish it were not so in TX. I even have had a few friends from there. Most left for various reasons.
check the exodus list from CA; Texas is in the top.
This made the local news in Dallas. There was quite an uproar over whoever made that original statement. Despite some confusion over how the recent law was written, what the person said does not apply to historical fact, which the holocaust is accepted as being, or certainly certain scientific or mathematic facts. Eisenhower was far sighted when he told Army photographers to take as many photographs of concentration camps as possible. He foresaw the day when that terrible thing would be denied, and, well, photographs just don't lie like words can.
Yes, the entire conversation was specifically related to the new Texas law.
Also, from your own new link, it was not a superintendent.
"Gina Peddy, the Carroll school district’s executive director of curriculum and instruction, made the comment Friday afternoon during a training session. “Just try to remember the concepts of [House Bill] 3979,” Peddy said in the recording, referring to a new Texas law that requires teachers to present multiple perspectives when discussing “widely debated and currently controversial” issues.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.