iPhone vs. Nikon D850/D500
Bill McKenna wrote:
I don't know if it's me. Maybe I just don't get it, but I read so often about how someone thinks the newest versions of the iPhone (11, 12 or 13) are the greatest cameras since sliced bread...and they are using them for serious work. I use mine when I'm somewhere without my good gear, or wasn't planning on shooting anything, but now it's there in front of me. But to take an iPhone (on purpose) instead of my D850 or D500 when I'm doing serious work??? What am I missing? I don't think my iPhone 12 is even in the same league with my two Nikons. And it's not even close. I do agree that it's a lot easier carrying an iPhone around in my back pocket, but in my mind, it just doesn't produce exceptional images, especially in low light. Are others happy with just average results? Maybe some people are too lazy to carry around heavier gear? Maybe I'm using my phone incorrectly? Thoughts?
I don't know if it's me. Maybe I just don't get i... (
show quote)
I use my D850, D500 and I7 phone for pictures. Each serves a unique purpose. For me, one does not replace the other, but may complements it.
I learned my lesson a few weeks back when someone recommended taking a look at the 2021 cell phone photo awards. A true genius can create a masterpiece with anything they care to pick up.
Bill McKenna wrote:
Maybe I'm using my phone incorrectly?
To get the most out of a phone camera takes quite a bit of practice. Are you practicing with your phone camera at all? As with any camera, it's all about getting to know camera's limitations and working within those limitations, learning which techniques work and which don't with that particular camera. To achieve this requires investing time experimenting and practicing. And you also need a positive attitude. If you are constantly thinking, "these images are going to be bad", then you will subconsciously take subpar images with it to fulfill your low expectations and prove your point.
When you have both your iPhone and DSLR camera on you, then by all means, use the DSLR. But unique, unplanned photo opportunities can also arise at times when you don't have your DSLR at your side - for example, while you are out running errands. At times like these, it is good to know how to use the phone camera effectively. A well-rounded photographer can capture meaningful, "serious" images with just about any camera.
Ollieboy wrote:
Attached is a photo done with my Pixel 3a in a pinch. Maybe not as good as a real camera, but close enough for me.
It is a real camera. It’s just built into a multifunctional device.
splitwindow wrote:
I attach a external battery to my iPhone with a cord long enough to put the battery in my pocket and leave the iPhone free to take photos all day long.
I do the same thing. I carry an anker battery brick that will pretty much last me all day. I just upgraded my IPhone to the 13 Pro Max which is supposed to have a longer battery life. Stay tuned for updates on that.
Wow. This is good. Now being a beginner I have to say I see where a real camera has it's advantages over a phone. I am an android user and I don't buy a new one just because there is a better camera on the new pbone. My phone is used as a phone and email and text mostly. I guess i am getting old. I am still learning how to really use my camera but still the pictures are better most of the time. My phone takes the thought process out of achieving that goal. I guess it's like everything else. Find the easy way around it or the short cut and stop using our brains. My phone is a point and shoot. Dummy proof.
olemikey
Loc: 6 mile creek, Spacecoast Florida
The cell pics I see from many look fine on the little screens, but most don't hold up well on anything larger. Now, in the hands of a pro, or capable photographer they can do better....but most that I see are just like any other "snapshots". I'm not knocking the tech, and the capabilities, but boy you sure do pay for that month in month out, and they are just another camera "stand alone", or without the network. I do have to admit that I am sick of everyone's "selfies". As always, YMMV.
olemikey wrote:
The cell pics I see from many look fine on the little screens, but most don't hold up well on anything larger. Now, in the hands of a pro, or capable photographer they can do better....but most that I see are just like any other "snapshots". I'm not knocking the tech, and the capabilities, but boy you sure do pay for that month in month out, and they are just another camera "stand alone", or without the network. I do have to admit that I am sick of everyone's "selfies". As always, YMMV.
The cell pics I see from many look fine on the lit... (
show quote)
Where are you seeing all the selfies. I don't see many around here.
---
olemikey
Loc: 6 mile creek, Spacecoast Florida
Bill_de wrote:
Where are you seeing all the selfies. I don't see many around here.
---
Lucky you, seems all my friends/family/acquaintences seem to feel I need to see their selfies........ pics of kids and grands and pets are fine, interesting subjects are fine, someones mug in front of something interesting, not so much......like I said, ymmv.
I am 71, and imagine that most of the contributors to this site are of an older generation. That said, today's generation views photos, no matter what they were taken with, on their phone, laptop, or tablet. As does 99% of the world. The differences we speak of between dslr and smartphone photos doesn't matter to them. These were quick shots with an android phone, no thought given to composition, just saw something, shot it. No post processing. Yes, my D600 would have been better photos, I could have tweaked them in post processing, but they are for viewing on a phone which works.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.