I wouldn't doubt that Pfizer is into something fishy. Then again the article was written by Tyler Durden.
Overall, we rate ZeroHedge an extreme right-biased conspiracy website based on the promotion of false/misleading/debunked information that routinely denigrates the left. (8/18/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 05/28/2021)
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/zero-hedge/ZeroHedge was banned from Twitter in February 2020; according to some, its last tweet referred to speculation the coronavirus could be a bioweapon, and BuzzFeed accused ZeroHedge of doxxing a Chinese scientist. As of June 2020, its account had been restored. ZeroHedge has been banned from other sites as well.
Writers on the left and right have referred to ZeroHedge as conservative; BuzzFeed referred to ZeroHedge as a "popular pro-Trump website," and Gateway Pundit referred to ZeroHedge as a "top conservative and pro-Trump website." Wikipedia refers to ZeroHedge as "a libertarian or right-wing financial blog," and notes that it reflects an "adherence to the Austrian School of economics and credit cycles." Wikipedia also says that ZeroHedge has "expanded into non-financial analysis, such as conspiracy theories and fringe rhetoric that has been associated with the Radical right (United States) and a pro-Russian bias."
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/zerohedge-media-bias
DennyT
Loc: Central Missouri woods
Great thread title””” follow the money”””
https://therealdeal.com/2021/09/03/trump-pac-a-key-tenant-at-strained-trump-tower/“” As other tenants have racked up hundreds of thousands of dollars in arrears at the 75-percent occupied Midtown Manhattan building during the pandemic, the Make America Great Again PAC has reliably paid over $37,500 per month to lease office space on its 15th floor since March, according to the Washington Post.
Rent isn’t the only payment the PAC is making at the building. It also paid $3,000 a month “for several months” to rent a retail kiosk in the lobby, despite the lobby being closed, the Post reported.
The payments may not be illegal in the loosely regulated world of super PACs, but they are drawing scrutiny.
He’s running a con,” Paul S. Ryan, of the watchdog group Common Cause, told the Post. “Talking about political expenses — but, in reality, raising money for self-enrichment.”
The PAC is paying $85 per square foot annually on the office space, in line with typical midtown Manhattan rates, Trump spokeswoman Liz Harrington told the Post. Prior to the PAC’s occupation, the 5,490-square-foot space was leased by Trump’s 2020 presidential campaign, though it was not used as its main headquarters. Other office space on the floor is vacant.
Not many people appear to be working out of the office. The space can accommodate around 30 people, but a filing from the PAC lists only three employees who work there, all of whom often work from home or from Trump’s residences in Florida and New Jersey, a source told the Post.“””””””
The big con!!!
My posted link never said ‘copy’. The posted link said the new drug mimics the functionality of ivermectin and suggested Pfizer stands to make shit tons of money by suppressing a readily available and inexpensive therapeutic that already possesses that functionality. Your ‘debunking’ link relies on parsing language as opposed to refuting the assertion that Pfizer has a huge stake in suppressing ivermectin.
And as to the second post suggesting ivermectin is not suppressed, I have been shown emails to my medical practicing extended families. Ivermectin is available, but medical folks are being told there will be bad repercussions if they PRESCIBE it. Suppression by threat.
Add that to the fact my local hospitals are at about half-staff levels because so many practitioers retired early, simply quit, or have been banned from returning. The narrative that hospitals are FULL is bunk in my area. They are grossly understaffed.
Tex-s wrote:
My posted link never said ‘copy’. The posted link said the new drug mimics the functionality of ivermectin
which the article at the link I provided explains is not true. Pfizer's drug does not mimic the functionality of ivermectin, unless you consider that if a drug helps to kill a pathogen, it mimics the functionality of any other drug that helps to kill a pathogen.
Ivermectin and Pfizer's drug work by completely different mechanisms. In case you missed it when you read the article, ivermectin opens glutamate-gated chloride channels of nerve and muscle cells, whereas Pfizer's protease inhibitors bind to proteolytic enzymes used by the Covid virus to replicate.
David Martin wrote:
which the article at the link I provided explains is not true. Pfizer's drug does not mimic the functionality of ivermectin, unless you consider that if a drug helps to kill a pathogen, it mimics the functionality of any other drug that helps to kill a pathogen.
Ivermectin and Pfizer's drug work by completely different mechanisms. In case you missed it when you read the article, ivermectin opens glutamate-gated chloride channels of nerve and muscle cells, whereas Pfizer's protease inhibitors bind to proteolytic enzymes used by the Covid virus to replicate.
which the article at the link I provided explains ... (
show quote)
Both pathways block the replication. They would, if the actions of those in power were about curing illness instead of establishing power in DC and profits in pharma, BOTH be used for said purpose. When you have the SAME people who chirped on and on about not trusting a “Trump vaccine” now looking to relegate people to second class citizens ( pronounced Nuremberg Laws) for not taking the vaccine, the so called leaders have no credibility. Then of course, there is the case of NAC. NAC was approved by the FDA in the 60’s and subsequently deregulated to OTC status after. But let someone suggest it is a therapeutic for Covid and voila’ the FDA reclassifies NAC as a prescription drug and specifically labels it as NOT a Covid therapeutic, without testing, mind. The fix is in, boys and girls.
https://www.nutraingredients-usa.com/Article/2021/05/11/CRN-This-is-not-the-final-word-on-NACAnd since that link only details legal issues around NAC itself, not claims of Covid efficacy.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34182881/ If you believe the FDA had nothing better to do than review a dietary supplement’s status during a pandemic, you have to either believe the pandemic is not actually an issue OR you have to believe the FDA was told to take action by someone. There is no other option. I’m on board with option 2.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34182881/
Modification of the molecular structure of many basic bioactive compounds redirects their efficacy. Testing with double-blind studies is necessary to prevent inadvertent side effects. We can not cure with a willy-nilly approach, yes, rolling the dice may come up with 7 then again it may be snake-eyes.
Tex-s wrote:
Both pathways block the replication.
As do most antiviral medications.
Tex-s wrote:
If you believe the FDA had nothing better to do than review a dietary supplement’s status during a pandemic, you have to either believe the pandemic is not actually an issue OR you have to believe the FDA was told to take action by someone.
It certainly seems that the FDA, along with the CDC, FBI and others - once respected organizations - have been reduced to political tools.
As for the use of ivermectin and NAC to treat Covid, in the words of the authors of your last citation: "Our findings need to be confirmed by properly designed prospective clinical trials."
Kraken wrote:
Overall, we rate ZeroHedge an extreme right-biased conspiracy website based on the promotion of false/misleading/debunked information that routinely denigrates the left. (8/18/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 05/28/2021)
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/zero-hedge/ZeroHedge was banned from Twitter in February 2020; according to some, its last tweet referred to speculation the coronavirus could be a bioweapon, and BuzzFeed accused ZeroHedge of doxxing a Chinese scientist. As of June 2020, its account had been restored. ZeroHedge has been banned from other sites as well.
Writers on the left and right have referred to ZeroHedge as conservative; BuzzFeed referred to ZeroHedge as a "popular pro-Trump website," and Gateway Pundit referred to ZeroHedge as a "top conservative and pro-Trump website." Wikipedia refers to ZeroHedge as "a libertarian or right-wing financial blog," and notes that it reflects an "adherence to the Austrian School of economics and credit cycles." Wikipedia also says that ZeroHedge has "expanded into non-financial analysis, such as conspiracy theories and fringe rhetoric that has been associated with the Radical right (United States) and a pro-Russian bias."
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/zerohedge-media-biasOverall, we rate ZeroHedge an extreme right-biased... (
show quote)
Yes those same folks banned the story about Hunter's Laptop remember!
Curtis_Lowe wrote:
Yes those same folks banned the story about Hunter's Laptop remember!
It's just one of those "who cares" stories.
Every family has a drunk Uncle or a skeleton or two
in the closet. But if it makes you feel better I
won't vote for Biden at the next election.
I'll vote for tump and I will vote many times
for him because he is an angel and has never done
nothing wrong, ever.
DennyT wrote:
Great thread title””” follow the money”””
https://therealdeal.com/2021/09/03/trump-pac-a-key-tenant-at-strained-trump-tower/“” As other tenants have racked up hundreds of thousands of dollars in arrears at the 75-percent occupied Midtown Manhattan building during the pandemic, the Make America Great Again PAC has reliably paid over $37,500 per month to lease office space on its 15th floor since March, according to the Washington Post.
Rent isn’t the only payment the PAC is making at the building. It also paid $3,000 a month “for several months” to rent a retail kiosk in the lobby, despite the lobby being closed, the Post reported.
The payments may not be illegal in the loosely regulated world of super PACs, but they are drawing scrutiny.
He’s running a con,” Paul S. Ryan, of the watchdog group Common Cause, told the Post. “Talking about political expenses — but, in reality, raising money for self-enrichment.”
The PAC is paying $85 per square foot annually on the office space, in line with typical midtown Manhattan rates, Trump spokeswoman Liz Harrington told the Post. Prior to the PAC’s occupation, the 5,490-square-foot space was leased by Trump’s 2020 presidential campaign, though it was not used as its main headquarters. Other office space on the floor is vacant.
Not many people appear to be working out of the office. The space can accommodate around 30 people, but a filing from the PAC lists only three employees who work there, all of whom often work from home or from Trump’s residences in Florida and New Jersey, a source told the Post.“””””””
The big con!!!
Great thread title””” follow the money””” br br h... (
show quote)
The "Real Big Con" was the Leftist Met Gala that charged $35,000 for a single night's ticket. For what?
Renting a Midtown Manhattan building space for conducting business is a business expense for doing something.
Why is the Left so opposed to any type of therapeutics to fight the virus? Is it because Trump once said way back in 2020 that he thought developing a therapeutic would almost be better than a vaccine? Probably.
Fotoartist wrote:
Why is the Left so opposed to any type of therapeutics to fight the virus? Is it because Trump once said way back in 2020 that he thought developing a therapeutic would almost be better than a vaccine? Probably.
I find that hard to believe, trump doesn't know what therapeutics
means or how to pronounce the word.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.