Life expectancy of a digital camera.
Aug 22, 2021 06:42:03 #
The camera might function well but the pictures could be a bit soft and not as crisp as new.
Aug 22, 2021 08:30:31 #
HallwoedHill
Loc: Chattanooga,TN
I bought a D 50 in 2005.Still working fine. However what will happen is the technology around the camera and post work will improve dramatically. While you will be able to still take acceptable pictures, at some point the struggle to keep the camera's software compatible with all that around it will create GAS! Happened to me in 2018.
Aug 22, 2021 08:35:36 #
peterjoseph wrote:
The camera might function well but the pictures could be a bit soft and not as crisp as new.
Why? Do the sensors fade???? Get foggy???
Aug 22, 2021 08:36:57 #
Longshadow wrote:
Why? Do the sensors fade???? Get foggy???
They don't. That's a nonsense reply.
Aug 22, 2021 08:48:25 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
They don't. That's a nonsense reply.
And THAT's how bad information gets throughout the internet.
People will read it and propagate it.......
Aug 22, 2021 08:50:00 #
Longshadow wrote:
And THAT's how bad information gets throughout the internet.
People will read it and propagate it.......
And THAT's how bad information gets throughout the internet.
People will read it and propagate it.......
Who cares. Policing the internet is a fool's errand. That person was probably repeating something they read. Just like how Sony is now making Nikon's high-end sensors. They've embedded a clever bug into the Nikon cameras with these Sony sensors: the Nikon DSLR suddenly dies after a encrypted number of flips of the mirror the sensor can detect as different from the original Sony mirrorless cameras. Just look online for 'Nikon Sudden Death Syndrome'. I've seen a thread where they think from your Nikon serial number you can identify the week number in the calendar year (01 -> 53) your camera is most likely to die. The syndrome isn't even very hush-hush. That's why it's so risky to buy used Nikon DSLRs.
Aug 22, 2021 08:56:45 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Who cares. Policing the internet is a fool's erran... (show quote)
Such a shame that it happens though. People wind up believing garbage.
Soon they'll believe there are 'chips' in vaccines.
Aug 22, 2021 08:59:32 #
Longshadow wrote:
Such a shame that it happens though. People wind up believing garbage.
Soon they'll believe there are 'chips' in vaccines.
Soon they'll believe there are 'chips' in vaccines.
I think they do have chip in vaccine. I am trying to get a booster shot now to get the updated chip.
Aug 22, 2021 09:05:35 #
Urnst wrote:
How many years, assuming reasonable care and use?
My D30 is 20 years old and doing just fine.
Aug 22, 2021 09:06:20 #
Longshadow wrote:
Why? Do the sensors fade???? Get foggy???
In at least one case, the Leica M9, that is exactly what happens. The term being used is “sensor rot”.
Sensors in those cameras were designed and made by Kodak. For a while Leica was replacing them for free, but the supply of parts has run out, and replacements are not available, so Leica can’t repair them.
Instead they are offering an upgrade to an M-10, or other current Leica camera, at a discount price.
https://www.reddotforum.com/content/2020/08/leica-no-longer-offering-ccd-sensor-replacement-adds-new-upgrade-options/
At least one private repair service is offering to swap Leica sensors for $1000.
In the strange world of Leica that may actually increase the value of a used, but working, M-9 a decade from now. Or not.
Aug 22, 2021 09:10:08 #
BebuLamar wrote:
I think they do have chip in vaccine. I am trying to get a booster shot now to get the updated chip.
Love it!!!
Aug 22, 2021 09:20:07 #
Hi Urnst,
I'm still using a Nikon Coolpix 995 manufactured in 2001 while I have two other cameras that quit working after only surviving 15 years (or so). It's really hard to tell but you should expect them to work longer than you need if you are prone to GAS! Take care & ...
I'm still using a Nikon Coolpix 995 manufactured in 2001 while I have two other cameras that quit working after only surviving 15 years (or so). It's really hard to tell but you should expect them to work longer than you need if you are prone to GAS! Take care & ...
Aug 22, 2021 09:23:54 #
gvarner
Loc: Central Oregon Coast
Urnst wrote:
I was wondering about the lifespan on the electronics. I'm considering the purchase of an older but underused camera. Thanks
Shutter count is likely the best indicator. To address risk, see if your insurer offers a personal property policy. I have one with State Farm, no deductible, no depreciation, replace or repair. It’s cheap if you’re not a pro. Covers new or used.
Aug 22, 2021 09:24:33 #
Urnst wrote:
How many years, assuming reasonable care and use?
My wife is still using a D40 I bought in 2007. Still going like new.
Aug 22, 2021 09:38:11 #
MrPhotog wrote:
In at least one case, the Leica M9, that is exactl... (show quote)
THAT particular camera sensor model or is it happening with ALL camera sensors across the board?
At least one case, any more?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.