Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Life expectancy of a digital camera.
Page <prev 2 of 8 next> last>>
Aug 21, 2021 15:27:28   #
BebuLamar
 
I have the Coolpix 2100 (2001) and a Coolpix 5000 (2002 or so) they are both sworking like when they are new. I have a used D1x I don't know how old it is I think about the same age as my 2 Coolpix and it doesn't work well. It has error quite often.
So I don't know but under good care 20 years isn't unreasonable.

Reply
Aug 21, 2021 15:39:35   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Until they die....

I have an 11 year old DSLR and a 15 year old bridge camera still working nicely.

Reply
Aug 21, 2021 16:13:07   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
Urnst wrote:
How many years, assuming reasonable care and use?


I’ve been using my Df for going on 8 years. But length of time is only one factor that figures into longevity. Dry, humid, hot, cold, dusty, sandy, salt spray. Reasonable is subjective, what is reasonable to one person may not be reasonable to another.

Reply
 
 
Aug 21, 2021 16:27:09   #
BebuLamar
 
Mac wrote:
I’ve been using my Df for going on 8 years. But length of time is only one factor that figures into longevity. Dry, humid, hot, cold, dusty, sandy, salt spray. Reasonable is subjective, what is reasonable to one person may not be reasonable to another.


I have a Df which is about as old as yours but I think 8 years is too short to talk about longevity.

Reply
Aug 21, 2021 16:35:11   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
BebuLamar wrote:
I have a Df which is about as old as yours but I think 8 years is too short to talk about longevity.


Agreed.

Reply
Aug 21, 2021 19:48:13   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
What worries me about the longevity of recent electronics is the formation of “tin whiskers” at the soldered connections. You can thank the European driven move to ROHS requirements that banned the classic 60-40 tin lead solder which has been the electronic industry standard for decades. The new Tin based solder can grow “whiskers” that over time can short circuits and cause failures. It’s enough of an issue that the US Govt/DOD has an exemption for defense related electronics so they can use the older 60-40 tin lead solder. If this sounds like Sci Fi, Google “tin whiskers” or see: https://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/background/index.htm

Reply
Aug 21, 2021 19:56:27   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
TriX wrote:
What worries me about the longevity of recent electronics is the formation of “tin whiskers” at the soldered connections. You can thank the European driven move to ROHS requirements that banned the classic 60-40 tin lead solder which has been the electronic industry standard for decades. The new Tin based solder can grow “whiskers” that over time can short circuits and cause failures. It’s enough of an issue that the US Govt/DOD has an exemption for defense related electronics so they can use the older 60-40 tin lead solder. If this sounds like Sci Fi, Google “tin whiskers” or see: https://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/background/index.htm
What worries me about the longevity of recent elec... (show quote)

What year was the new solder ratio implemented?

Reply
 
 
Aug 21, 2021 19:58:32   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
Longshadow wrote:
What year was the new solder ratio implemented?


2006. “RoHS (Restriction of Hazardous Substances) is a European Union directive that restricts the use of lead, mercury, cadmium, chromium (VI), PBBs, and PBDEs in electrical and electronic equipment as of July 1, 2006.”

Reply
Aug 21, 2021 20:27:04   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
TriX wrote:
2006. “RoHS (Restriction of Hazardous Substances) is a European Union directive that restricts the use of lead, mercury, cadmium, chromium (VI), PBBs, and PBDEs in electrical and electronic equipment as of July 1, 2006.”

Interesting....reducing the lead footprint.
Been 60/40 for a thousand years.

Reply
Aug 21, 2021 21:11:44   #
User ID
 
Urnst wrote:
How many years, assuming reasonable care and use?

A digital camera will produce about 40 trillion pixels if well cared for.

Reply
Aug 21, 2021 21:33:06   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
Urnst wrote:
How many years, assuming reasonable care and use?


Technical obsolesce is more likely to occur before the end of life of the hardware.

Reply
 
 
Aug 21, 2021 21:35:26   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
JD750 wrote:
Technical obsolesce is more likely to occur before the end of life of the hardware.


Reply
Aug 21, 2021 22:21:47   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
E.L.. Shapiro wrote:
In a previous life, so to speak, you purchased a fine camera or cameras- perhas a Leica, Rolleiflex, Speed Graphic, or what every brand and format you preferred, used it for years, had if fixed when it broke, and perhaps handed it down to you kids or grandkids. Many still had collector or user collectors value.

No use worrying about it or pining for the days of yore. Cameras are disposable! Technology moves at warp speed and market strategies are damn- near aggressive. There is a lot of perceived or real build-in obsolescence and a misconception that upgrading equipment will necessarily upgrade one's photography.

If you take some care in maintaining your gear and do not beat the dickens out of it, it will probably serve you well for a decent span of time. Most folks around here will probably want to upgrade or retool well before the present system comes to its untimely demise.

Used to be that status symbol or the "badge" of the experienced photographer was a "brassed' camera where all the black finish wore off and exposed the metal or a Speed Graphic that looked like it survived Armigeadon! to too many gold plated anniversary commemorative cameras anymore finished in exotic colourful leathers. Many are made of carbon fibre- might as well be fabricated of compostable material so they won't mess up the oceans and the landfill!

OK- so I once owned a Hasselblad with a silver plate engraved with Victor's signature- but I did use it for 28 years!
In a previous life, so to speak, you purchased a f... (show quote)


The difference between now and then was that there were improvements in film over the years. You didn't need a new camera to take advantage of those improvements. It would be nice if today's sensors and related chips could just slip into yesterday's bodies.

I do confess that I replace photo gear, woodworking tools, and cars more often than needed. But somebody has to supply the used market.

---

Reply
Aug 21, 2021 22:38:40   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
Bill_de wrote:
The difference between now and then was that there were improvements in film over the years. You didn't need a new camera to take advantage of those improvements. It would be nice if today's sensors and related chips could just slip into yesterday's bodies.

I do confess that I replace photo gear, woodworking tools, and cars more often than needed. But somebody has to supply the used market.

---


Maybe somebody will make a camera with a replaceable sensor element! It will only cost the same as the camera. LOL.

Good that you are stimulating the economy!

Reply
Aug 22, 2021 06:41:21   #
Pistnbroke Loc: UK
 
The component that deteriorates is the electrolytic capacitors on the circuit board ..life 20-=25 yeas. some older cars are having these replaced in there ECUs

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.