Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Camera or Lens
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Aug 15, 2021 21:55:34   #
DaveyDitzer Loc: Western PA
 
One thing you might want to think about is why do you think that you need/want to upgrade in the first place? What will you be able to do with an upgrade that you can't do with the D5600?[/quote]

I have D5600 along with other Nikon bodies. I think it's an excellent camera body for the money and I'd be more inclined to consider glass; but wait, post photos and get some good advice here before spending money. Also, if you think you might later migrate to FF, then consider FF glass now. But first and foremost, get some advice and proceed thoughtfully.

Reply
Aug 16, 2021 00:15:15   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
Erp1938 wrote:
I have a Nikon D5600 with a Tamron 18mm 400 Lens. would like to think about upgrading camera or lens or both, take mostly wildlife and landscape photos suggestions please.


You need a 200-500 for wildlife. You will love it.

The D5600 is an excellent camera. I had one and used it with the 200-500 for awesome shots.

Reply
Aug 16, 2021 00:27:19   #
Hip Coyote
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
You have Nikon's cutting-edge 24MP 'upper-entry' DSLR in the D5600. You can't do better for this camera for landscape without significant investments in both the camera and lenses, and even then, it will be difficult to say you 'see' a tangible difference.

That is sage advice.

How 'serious' about wildlife? Are you up at all hours stalking birds and other animals, in all weather? Are you tracking birds in flight? You can blow a whole bunch of money on a few of Nikon's other cropped sensor bodies that are better at these specific tasks than your D5600. Even with a new body, you still need a lens appropriate for these all-weather, low-light shooting situations.

Your 18-400mm has more than enough focal length for wildlife, especially on the DX format body, although it's going to perform best in full light. Your D5600 has plenty of high ISO performance and frames per second to let you work outside of full sunlight.

If you are practicing wildlife with the 18-400 and disappointed with the results, you'll save your self a lot of money by simply posting some example JPEGs and storing the attached files and asking for help on your technique. An hour of coaching and 4 hours of practice are widely known to generate more and better results than another two (2) new lenses or even 30 more megapixels.
You have Nikon's cutting-edge 24MP 'upper-entry' D... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Aug 16, 2021 10:03:20   #
A. T.
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
You have Nikon's cutting-edge 24MP 'upper-entry' DSLR in the D5600. You can't do better for this camera for landscape without significant investments in both the camera and lenses, and even then, it will be difficult to say you 'see' a tangible difference.

How 'serious' about wildlife? Are you up at all hours stalking birds and other animals, in all weather? Are you tracking birds in flight? You can blow a whole bunch of money on a few of Nikon's other cropped sensor bodies that are better at these specific tasks than your D5600. Even with a new body, you still need a lens appropriate for these all-weather, low-light shooting situations.

Your 18-400mm has more than enough focal length for wildlife, especially on the DX format body, although it's going to perform best in full light. Your D5600 has plenty of high ISO performance and frames per second to let you work outside of full sunlight.

If you are practicing wildlife with the 18-400 and disappointed with the results, you'll save your self a lot of money by simply posting some example JPEGs and storing the attached files and asking for help on your technique. An hour of coaching and 4 hours of practice are widely known to generate more and better results than another two (2) new lenses or even 30 more megapixels.
You have Nikon's cutting-edge 24MP 'upper-entry' D... (show quote)


Well said.......

Reply
Aug 16, 2021 18:39:59   #
mundy-F2 Loc: Chicago suburban area
 
larryepage wrote:
The zoom ratio of the 18-400mm lens is 22:1. This is a very wide range, and accomplishing it requires some important compromises along the way. Those are likely to be most apparent at the long end of the zoom range. Zooms with a ratio of 4:1 or 5:1 generally require fewer design compromises and tend to perform better, including being sharper at longer focal lengths. You may also find a 'faster' lens to provide you with some better results.

As for your camera, I agree that the D5600 is a generally competent machine. Its sensor is fine, but as has been mentioned, the viewfinder provides smaller and dimmer images than the improved viewfinders in more enhanced models provide. This can make it more difficult than necessary to
achieve best focus.

Depending on how you shoot and how you use your camera, other models can provide you with a much better user interface, including more directly accessible physical controls and requiring far less dependence on the menu system. The biggest difference is that the D7500 and D500 both provide two command dials, allowing direct and immediate control of both shutter speed and lens aperture. While this may not directly affect picture sharpness, it can definitely reduce distractions that draw your attention away from critical things that do.

Finally...good shooting technique is critical, especially when shooting with long lenses. Proper two-handed camera support (or a sturdy and effective tripod or monopod) is very important. So is acareful, controlled shutter release technique that doesn't jostle the camera and lens, even a little bit.

Improving some of these may involve spending some money. Others just require attention and practice. I suggest working on the procedural ones first, then consider whether your equipment is holding you back. At any rate, have fun as you work through to discover how to improve your images.
The zoom ratio of the 18-400mm lens is 22:1. This ... (show quote)


Sound advice. Changing your procedure is only expensive in time and not money. I would not change unless I had to. I am shopping for a digital camera since I do not have one. From those who know your camera, it sounds like it is a very good camera.
Mundy

Reply
Aug 16, 2021 18:49:34   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
You have Nikon's cutting-edge 24MP 'upper-entry' DSLR in the D5600. You can't do better for this camera for landscape without significant investments in both the camera and lenses, and even then, it will be difficult to say you 'see' a tangible difference.

How 'serious' about wildlife? Are you up at all hours stalking birds and other animals, in all weather? Are you tracking birds in flight? You can blow a whole bunch of money on a few of Nikon's other cropped sensor bodies that are better at these specific tasks than your D5600. Even with a new body, you still need a lens appropriate for these all-weather, low-light shooting situations.

Your 18-400mm has more than enough focal length for wildlife, especially on the DX format body, although it's going to perform best in full light. Your D5600 has plenty of high ISO performance and frames per second to let you work outside of full sunlight.

If you are practicing wildlife with the 18-400 and disappointed with the results, you'll save your self a lot of money by simply posting some example JPEGs and storing the attached files and asking for help on your technique. An hour of coaching and 4 hours of practice are widely known to generate more and better results than another two (2) new lenses or even 30 more megapixels.
You have Nikon's cutting-edge 24MP 'upper-entry' D... (show quote)


Yes, the 18-400 has enough focal range but what it lacks, amount other things, is sharpness at 400mm. It is a great do it all travel lens, perhaps one of the best available in that genre, but it is not a great lens on an absolute basis. There are much better choices, albeit for more money.

Reply
Aug 17, 2021 09:39:19   #
ChrisRL
 
Ah. If you want sharper pictures you have to invest in:

1) super sturdy and lightweight tripod (not cheap);
2) remote release for your camera (wired or wireless);
3) a 4x4 vehicle (to get you and your camera to the right place to shoot);
4) an ephemeris (to get you ready at the right time to shoot);
5) a Benq or other pro-level photo-suitable computer monitor that's calibrated for Adobe or whatever you use;
6) you didn't mention - are you going to make bigger prints or exhibition-level prints?

Reply
 
 
Aug 17, 2021 17:44:42   #
mundy-F2 Loc: Chicago suburban area
 
ChrisRL wrote:
Ah. If you want sharper pictures you have to invest in:

1) super sturdy and lightweight tripod (not cheap);
2) remote release for your camera (wired or wireless);
3) a 4x4 vehicle (to get you and your camera to the right place to shoot);
4) an ephemeris (to get you ready at the right time to shoot);
5) a Benq or other pro-level photo-suitable computer monitor that's calibrated for Adobe or whatever you use;
6) you didn't mention - are you going to make bigger prints or exhibition-level prints?
Ah. If you want sharper pictures you have to inves... (show quote)


All good points. I will add a couple warm cups of coffee for those early morning BLUE picture hours when it is cool or snow on the ground. Don't forget the touch screen gloves to keep your fingers from sticking to the camera or lens.
Mundy

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.