Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
OK Hogs, any idea what happened here?
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jul 29, 2021 15:31:38   #
xtoothdr
 
Thanks, probably will reduce frame rate until technology catches up...

Reply
Jul 29, 2021 18:36:23   #
bdk Loc: Sanibel Fl.
 
I vote motion blur.

Reply
Jul 29, 2021 18:43:06   #
xtoothdr
 
Alright, I will start keeping score.
Canon sent it up to their gurus so we will see if they respond?
Thanks all...

Reply
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Jul 30, 2021 10:02:35   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
Yep, rolling shutter. With hummers I actually prefer a little bit of motion blue. So often those completely frozen hummers look unnatural. I think the pixelation look can be handled in PS.

Reply
Jul 31, 2021 01:34:42   #
xtoothdr
 
As I learn more about RS, I agree, thanks...

Reply
Jul 31, 2021 07:45:37   #
E.L.. Shapiro Loc: Ottawa, Ontario Canada
 
https://research.google/pubs/pub37744/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_shutter

Check these out, interesting information that is well explained.

Wheter the cause of the "blur" is rolling shutter to just an insufficient speed to freeze the action of the rapidity of a hummingbird's wing movement, the shot is great and natural.

It's like the shots you see of aircraft in flight with the propeller "frozen". I find that disconcerting, especially if I were the pilot or passenger on that airplane or helicopter. A little motion blur can be a good thing!

A Humminbird flaps its wing between 50 and 63 times per second. The tail rotor speed of a Sikorsky Helicopter is Tail Rotor Speed ( at100%) is 1,244 rpm. It would be interesting to do the math and fine which is faster.

Reply
Jul 31, 2021 15:19:49   #
xtoothdr
 
....way beyond my pay grade.

Reply
Check out Travel Photography - Tips and More section of our forum.
Jul 31, 2021 18:23:05   #
therwol Loc: USA
 
E.L.. Shapiro wrote:

A Humminbird flaps its wing between 50 and 63 times per second. The tail rotor speed of a Sikorsky Helicopter is Tail Rotor Speed ( at100%) is 1,244 rpm. It would be interesting to do the math and fine which is faster.


The helicopter can fly faster than the hummingbird. Trust me.

You're comparing apples and oranges, units that don't match, so I came up with another interpretation of the question. Sikorsky S-76 178 mph. Hummingbird 61 mph.

Reply
Jul 31, 2021 18:27:50   #
xtoothdr
 
hmmmmm.....

Reply
Jul 31, 2021 19:48:16   #
E.L.. Shapiro Loc: Ottawa, Ontario Canada
 
therwol wrote:
The helicopter can fly faster than the hummingbird. Trust me.

You're comparing apples and oranges, units that don't match, so I came up with another interpretation of the question. Sikorsky S-76 178 mph. Hummingbird 61 mph.


WOW! You must like to argue. I was no proposing a race between ad helicopter and a hummingbird. The point I was trying to make was that a bit of motion blur can make an effective picture.

I am not an oenologist- I just enjoy interesting, detailed and well-crafted photographs of birds and all wildlife.

As for helicopters, I know too much about them. I shot reconnaissance imagery and repelled from all kinds of helicopters and gunships in Vietnam. At the time, however, I did not ask the pilots about the specifications of the aircraft. I was just interested in getting the job done and getting the hell away from the targeted area in one piece.

Maybe now, I should go out and buy a radar gun so I can ascertain MPH stats on the pidgins in the l local park- sorry, I'm in Canada, we are metric, it has to be KPH!

Kindest regards!

Reply
Jul 31, 2021 20:45:31   #
therwol Loc: USA
 
E.L.. Shapiro wrote:
WOW! You must like to argue. I was no proposing a race between ad helicopter and a hummingbird. The point I was trying to make was that a bit of motion blur can make an effective picture.

I am not an oenologist- I just enjoy interesting, detailed and well-crafted photographs of birds and all wildlife.

As for helicopters, I know too much about them. I shot reconnaissance imagery and repelled from all kinds of helicopters and gunships in Vietnam. At the time, however, I did not ask the pilots about the specifications of the aircraft. I was just interested in getting the job done and getting the hell away from the targeted area in one piece.

Maybe now, I should go out and buy a radar gun so I can ascertain MPH stats on the pidgins in the l local park- sorry, I'm in Canada, we are metric, it has to be KPH!

Kindest regards!
WOW! You must like to argue. I was no proposing ... (show quote)


I was just joking. I agree on the motion blur, but that isn't the same as the rolling shutter effect. It looks like there are two sides in the debate on this picture. Whatever the answer, I don't see the rolling shutter effect as being positive. A picture of the helicopter rotor and blades at high shutter speed would make the blades seem curved. We need global shutters in our cameras.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.