PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA

If you are considering the Lumix, the FZ2500 should also be on your list.
Compare all 3 here:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/compare/Sony_DSC-RX10_IV_vs_Panasonic_DC-FZ1000_II_vs_Panasonic_DMC-FZ2500/BHitems/1361560-REG_1460257-REG_1280827-REG

SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA

The RX100 won’t fit the bill. He needs the RX10MIV.

frjeff Loc: Mid-Michigan

I have both the LUMIX FX1000 (v1) and an older Sony RX10M3. I no longer have the one metric ton kit. I usually carry both, find them excellent in all aspects for my experienced amateur needs and have never looked back. I may upgrade the RX10 soon, but the FZ will not be replaced.

frjeff Loc: Mid-Michigan

I have both the LUMIX FX1000 (v1) and an older Sony RX10M3. I no longer have the one metric ton kit. I usually carry both, find them excellent in all aspects for my experienced amateur needs and have never looked back. I may upgrade the RX10 soon, but the FZ will not be replaced.

larryhav Loc: Charlotte, NC

Wow, UHH'ers did not disappoint again with recommendations, links, photos and knowledge. This is going to be a difficult decision. I will definitely rent the three bridge cameras I mentioned in my original post. However, based on my planned use which is more travel photos and some wildlife for social media and photo books, I am leaning toward the Sony for it's technology, reach, and speed advantages. I will rent the SonyRX10 IV, Panasonic Lumix FZ1000II and Leica and make my final decision. After testing, I will wait a month or two to see if any of the three come out with newer models and then make my final decision. Again, thank you all for sharing your knowledge and helping me make my final decision.

dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida

Now you have changed the subject from "A bridge camera and a superzoom are the same thing. Tell us which 1” sensor superzoom is pocketable?" ... your new subject is "reach," 15x vs 25x

One useable solution is the use of Opteka High Definition 2.2X Telephoto Converter giving a reach of 792mm. Opteka 2.2x High Definition AF Telephoto Lens is the one I have, it fits my adapter which is fitted to my Panasonic... 52mm threads. Understand any problems that may result from these add-on lenses is correctable by our new AI editware.

Amazon model is 52mm threads $10 https://opteka.com/products/op2252bk?_pos=2&_sid=7f0b96644&_ss=r

To allow the screw-on lenses the Superzooms will require an adapter that is about $30... I prefer the adhesive one.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/253957309636

42.5 - - 52mm step ring $3
https://www.ebay.com/itm/332883443059?hash=item4d81663d73:g:OH8AAOxyVPJSJamN

The above are for my Panasonic TZ-100, certainly, I made a choice over the sony at the time, going for the longer reach of the Panasonic compared to the Sony... also the lower price. My comments here and in my previous comments in this post actually may vary with budget and preference in the different feature differences between Sony, Canon, and Panasonic.

Tina 2 Loc: New Hampshire

I bought the RX 10iv a few months ago and absolutely love it. You will not be disappointed!

joyful4him85 Loc: Florida

I purchased the Sony Cyber-shot DSC RX10 IV last December and have been very pleased with its performance. The deciding factor for me was the fact that it had weather sealing and I've put that to the test multiple times already with rain (a must in Florida unless you want to pack and unpack it all the time). Depending on the conditions you shoot under, that might make a difference for you!

mffox Loc: Avon, CT

I too have a Leica V-Lux type 114 and love what it can do.

SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA

So to get more reach you can add a crappy telephoto adapter that will most certainly adversely affect IQ, while also having a detrimental effect on your maximum aperture, or you can get the Sony RX10MIV, a true superzoom, that will get you out to. 600mm equivalent at f/4 with the excellent Zeiss lens, and if that’s not enough reach and you’re shooting JPEG’s the highly rated Clear Image Zoom will get you to 1200mm equivalent, still at f/4.

Photocraig

My solution to the downsizing issue was to add a near-normal focal length pancake lens to my kit. I then carry it mounted onto my APS-C Canon body--the EF-S 24mm f2.8. It makes a lightweight, similar sized to a Bridge camera package. The 24MP sensor gives me images good enough to crop and enlarge with results similar to the small sensor bridge cameras offer. For serious work, I often pack my Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4, and may or may not carry it with me on walks, etc.. While heavier and larger it produces top results, great portraits. But for "walking around" and not stopping and composing the heck out of a subject or scene--the 24mm is an easy way to go, while preserving an ability to produce better results with the better and more versatile lens when so inclined.

I suggest that you try the same strategy with your 5D-V and the EF 40mm 2.8 Pancake. Then pick a light-weight "normal zoom" for more serious or golden hour stuff and you've given up nothing. You approximate the small package with the pancake, but still have the horsepower to create good images when you want to. Your 5D-V will certainly stand up to quite a small crop, to "simulate" a longer lens as well as eliminate distracting elements.

Rather than rent the Bridge, rent the pancake for less $$ I presume, and give it the "Stroll" test around town and see if my experience matches yours. While the 5D-V out weighs and out guns my 77D, you're still ahead, if it works for you

Bet you keep the 40mm pancake in any case.

C

xt2 Loc: British Columbia, Canada

Rent some and try them out to make sure your choice meets YOUR requirements & nit mine Larry.

Cheers!

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Get the Panasonic FZ1000 and save a crap load of money for the same camera except for a red dot saying steal me.
https://www.digitalcameraworld.com/news/leica-announces-v-lux-5-a-rebadged-panasonic-fz1000-ii

Blaster34 Loc: Florida Treasure Coast

Totally an amateur and hobbyist and I Just purchased a Sony RX-10IV and now getting used to it...extremely, extremely capable camera and I'm using it now for all my travel needs. If you've seen Gene's photo's in previous post you'll see its excellent capability....Cheers and good luck

DeanS Loc: Capital City area of North Carolina

Agree. I had a V-Lux 3 and presently have a 4. lots of features with good pix.