Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Sigma 300-800 f5.6 anyone own one? If so how do you like it except for weight?
Jun 27, 2021 15:07:56   #
Drbobcameraguy Loc: Eaton Ohio
 
I'm thinking about pulling the trigger on a Sigma 300-800 f5.6. Reviews are good for such a zoom. I know it's heavy. 12lbs. All I want to know is real world sharpness and focus speed results without a teleconverter. Thanks.

Reply
Jun 27, 2021 22:48:40   #
Drbobcameraguy Loc: Eaton Ohio
 
Bump

Reply
Jun 28, 2021 09:09:54   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Lens Rentals in Tenn. rents them - at least for Canon .....

Reply
 
 
Jun 28, 2021 11:25:52   #
Drbobcameraguy Loc: Eaton Ohio
 
I have read a lot of reviews. They appear to perform quite well for a zoom of that range. Was hoping someone here had personal experience. Lol. Might have to get my own experience from the looks of it. Thanks for the info

Reply
Jun 28, 2021 14:23:13   #
bwana Loc: Bergen, Alberta, Canada
 
Drbobcameraguy wrote:
I'm thinking about pulling the trigger on a Sigma 300-800 f5.6. Reviews are good for such a zoom. I know it's heavy. 12lbs. All I want to know is real world sharpness and focus speed results without a teleconverter. Thanks.

The biggest problem with any lens of this size and focal length is stability! A lot of people complain about a lens' image quality when it is actually the expertise of the person using it.

Use a good solid tripod or keep the exposure time short, short, short (with probably a corresponding higher ISO). Shoot a suite of subs and pick the best one. Watch out for atmospheric motion in landscape shots.

Rent one and try it out...

bwa

Reply
Jun 28, 2021 15:47:46   #
rweddle
 
I have had the lens for 15 plus years and it has taken a lot of good bird photos primarily. It is HEAVY at about 13 pounds with the lens hood and then you add the camera body. I bought a Gitzo system 5 tripod and presently am using a Kirk gimble head, the new, not the King Cobra which I used earlier but prefer to not side mount because of the weight. It worked well for years and I have been satisfied with the pictures I obtained. I did tend to keep the shutter speed up and with the inertia of the combination I had little problems with blurred pics if I did my part. This is the original 300-800, not the latter digital version which had some new lens coatings but as I remember the same lens formula. I quickly found a picture taken in the last couple years to show that it does have decent feather detail. It was taken with 1/50 sec shutter speed.
I use it rarely now because of some more modern lenses in the 600 mm range but it is a good lens from a blind with good support. It will be used again for birds but little else. It can be obtained much cheaper than a 600/4.0 prime.



Reply
Jun 28, 2021 16:59:30   #
Drbobcameraguy Loc: Eaton Ohio
 
rweddle wrote:
I have had the lens for 15 plus years and it has taken a lot of good bird photos primarily. It is HEAVY at about 13 pounds with the lens hood and then you add the camera body. I bought a Gitzo system 5 tripod and presently am using a Kirk gimble head, the new, not the King Cobra which I used earlier but prefer to not side mount because of the weight. It worked well for years and I have been satisfied with the pictures I obtained. I did tend to keep the shutter speed up and with the inertia of the combination I had little problems with blurred pics if I did my part. This is the original 300-800, not the latter digital version which had some new lens coatings but as I remember the same lens formula. I quickly found a picture taken in the last couple years to show that it does have decent feather detail. It was taken with 1/50 sec shutter speed.
I use it rarely now because of some more modern lenses in the 600 mm range but it is a good lens from a blind with good support. It will be used again for birds but little else. It can be obtained much cheaper than a 600/4.0 prime.
I have had the lens for 15 plus years and it has t... (show quote)


Thank you so very much!! That was what I was looking for. An actual user. You just cost me 3300.00 bucks. Lol

Reply
 
 
Jun 28, 2021 20:45:10   #
Larryshuman
 
I used my Sigma 800mm F:5.6 AF since 2002 when it was new at $5900.00.I've won a photo contest in 2012. I use it mostly with my D3, D600 or the D810.

Reply
Jun 29, 2021 01:15:49   #
Idahomw
 
12 lbs. That's not a lens, that's a small observatory!

Reply
Jun 29, 2021 01:38:07   #
Rodeo Lensman
 
I also own the Sigma 300-800. I mount it on a Katana jr Gimbal head, attached to a TR344L Carbon Fiber tripod, both made by Pro Media Gear (Chicago). I use either a D850 or D500 with the 300-800. I have gotten some beautiful bird shots with it, and plan on taking it to Alaska for some work with grizzly bears in Denali National Park. It's a very sharp lens, but its' weight lets you know your packing a "monster lens". To avoid any excessive movement, I attach a 7" monitor to the camera body, for focus checking and composition, and use a wireless remote for shutter release. I'm very happy with the lens, my only wish is that it would have come with a sherpa to tote the monster.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.