joer wrote:
The notion that full frame lenses perform better on crop bodies is a myth.
Regardless of whether it is or it isn’t a myth, it depends on the lens and this “demonstration” misses a critical point. The sharpness figures that DXO publishes are in equivalent MP. Since the D800 is 36MP and the D500 is 20, of course the lens provides higher sharpness IN MP on a higher resolution body.
The arguments for using a FF lens on a crop body are:
1) since you are using the center of the lens, you “miss” the corner aberrations and light fall off that is typical of most lenses when used wide open
2) the higher end lenses from manufacturers that produce both APSC and FF lenses (sturdier build quality, fluorite elements, faster max aperture, long, fast teles and special purpose lenses such as T/S) are almost always FF lenses
3) they provide a path to FF (if that’s your ultimate goal) without having to replace all your lenses
The arguments for crop lenses on crop bodies are:
1) lighter weight and smaller size
2) potentially lower cost (but not always).
In the end, it depends on the individual lens (and it’s quality), manufacturer and the application (including speed, FL and special features). In the Canon world, if you want very fast lenses, long fast teles, rugged pro grade build quality, fluorite elements or special purpose lenses, they will be FF. Now whether you prefer primes or zooms depends not so much on IQ as the best zooms are excellent (although the very best lenses in that respect do tend to be primes), it’s more a question of max aperture (the fastest lenses are almost always primes) and size/weight vs versatility. As I progress farther into photography over the decades, more and more I’m buying just primes (for the speed and weight) and “zooming with my feet” (where possible).