3D & 2D - Imagination.
You will need a pair of anaglyph glasses to view in 3D. (red & cyan lenses.)
2D converted to 3D.
Photo Credit: Victoria Borodinova - Pixabay.
SoHillGuy wrote:
You will need a pair of anaglyph glasses to view in 3D. (red & cyan lenses.)
2D converted to 3D.
Photo Credit: Victoria Borodinova - Pixabay.
I would enjoy even more if she had higher heels!
SoHillGuy wrote:
You will need a pair of anaglyph glasses to view in 3D. (red & cyan lenses.)
2D converted to 3D.
Photo Credit: Victoria Borodinova - Pixabay.
Very nice image off a lovely young lady
However she is wearing one of the ugliest pairs of shoe I have seen!!! Sorry I just hate stripper shoes, 6" CFM's or bare foot for me and sans jewelry.
Where can I buy these glasses?
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
splitload wrote:
Where can I buy these glasses?
I have a pair of red/blue filters in a cardboard frame. I think the blue filter might be the wrong colour, but I still do get the 3D effect.
If you have camera filters of the right colours you could just hold them in front of your eyes (red on left, I believe, is the correct placement).
Do you have coloured cellophane that is used as gift wrap for baskets and plants? You may not have a perfect colour match, but it may work.
I have not sourced commercial products, but I don't think I would pay more than $2 to get the 3D look; it is just not worth more than that to me.
Manglesphoto wrote:
Very nice image off a lovely young lady
However she is wearing one of the ugliest pairs of shoe I have seen!!! Sorry I just hate stripper shoes, 6" CFM's or bare foot for me and sans jewelry.
***
Add that to Tatoos and nose rings, etc.
SoHillGuy wrote:
***
Add that to Tatoos and nose rings, etc.
***
Amazon for one. Search the internet for others.
azted
Loc: Las Vegas, NV.
Structurally, a very effective silhouette.
azted wrote:
Structurally, a very effective silhouette.
***
It does have some merits.
Give me barefooted anytime!
ski
Loc: West Coast, USA
I agree with the rest.. Get rid of the shoes... Instead of the eye going to the model, the shoes take the eye... Otherwise a great shot...
ski wrote:
I agree with the rest.. Get rid of the shoes... Instead of the eye going to the model, the shoes take the eye... Otherwise a great shot...
***
Comment regonized, Im only the converter of the 2D to 3D.
for some reason my attention just keeps going to those shoes.
Bushpilot wrote:
for some reason my attention just keeps going to those shoes.
***
I have the feeling it is the highth of the heel that stands out.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.