Is he deaf or can't have an idea of his own ?
Oct 28, 2012 15:10:28 #
cat - t wrote:
236 years
Oh Merde !!! I am off 6 years ?
From your answer , I can deduct that you are aware of the fact that this Country is much better then the rest..... 'cause the rest of them are struggling when we are in trouble ,
Oct 28, 2012 15:22:08 #
You want a President who is on all of the late night variety shows where he gets asked "fluff" questions?...Obama spends more time on TV shows that he does running the country....Oh, excise me, that should be "trying" to run the country...
Kit Lens wrote:
Sarge, Do you really think he was being coached?
Come on. You guys see so many conspiracies that it amazes me you can fall asleep at night.
Maybe he won the debate because Romney kept changing his position. Take another look at that debate and see how Romney is sweating (literally). Romney fell apart in the last debate and that is something we don't need in a President.
Why can't we just stop with all the conspiracies and bullshit and move on?
Come on. You guys see so many conspiracies that it amazes me you can fall asleep at night.
Maybe he won the debate because Romney kept changing his position. Take another look at that debate and see how Romney is sweating (literally). Romney fell apart in the last debate and that is something we don't need in a President.
Why can't we just stop with all the conspiracies and bullshit and move on?
Oct 28, 2012 15:31:15 #
Ok, it is a copy-paqste but very interesting at least for me and the millions who care for our Country
>
>
> Subject: Your future if we do not change this on November 6th
>
>
> Please read the below and pass on to anyone that you think might vote for this idiot. To the best of my knowledge I do not know anyone that would, but you may. Thanks.
>
> Obama's Real Second Term Plan
>
> By Ned Ryun on 10.26.12 @ 6:08AM
>
> You won't recognize this country after his second term -- the obvious reason he's not telling you what he has in mind for it.
>
> Mitt Romney said it best in the last debate when he informed the President that, "attacking me isn't an agenda," which prompted the Obama campaign to immediately release what they call a plan for the second term. This 20-page repackaging of speeches notwithstanding, President Obama remains perhaps the only president in history to run for reelection who not only can't talk about his record but also can't discuss his real agenda for a second term.
>
> Now it's not that he can't because he doesn't have any ideas about what he wants to do. He does have big plans, but his vision of the future is profoundly different from that of most Americans. The America that Obama sees when he sits on the Truman Balcony at night and dreams about the next four years is radically altered reality for everyone. It should scare every American -- unless you happen to be getting Obama's free cell phone service.
>
> Obama would like everyone to believe that his second-term policies will address what he sees as the great inequalities and unfairness inherent in the American system. He wants to level the playing field. What he can't tell you -- and what most Americans are realizing -- is that leveling out America will reduce freedom, opportunity, income, innovation, and upward mobility in favor of a government-driven economy. With a government-driven society will come statism, and collectivism follows right on the heels of statism, which will destroy America.
>
> Here's the stark proof, keeping in mind that this is a mere snapshot of the "remaking" Obama has in store that will affect millions of American families and businesses. The President's proposed budget projects will have federal spending soaring to $5.820 trillion per year, making Obama the biggest government spender in the history of the world. With all the talk from the President about spending cuts to satisfy independent voters, the sum of all of Obama's spending over the next ten years could total more than $40 trillion that we simply don't have.
>
> We can't afford Washington's spending now. Do we really think only the wealthy will foot the bill for such dramatic increases in government expenditures? The President's proposals will drive $100 billion in tax hikes next year and more than $2 trillion in tax increases over the next 10 years hitting every American.
>
> With more than 40 million Americans on food stamps, welfare is the fastest-growing portion of the budget under Obama. Food stamp usage is up a staggering 46% and the cost of the program has increased by 72%. Over the next four years, the President is preparing to increase spending on these programs to enable the government to increase benefits and provide for an increasing share of the population.
>
> The slow creep of dependency will see a smaller middle class and a larger dependent class of not just the poor but individuals and families who once could afford to live without the government's help, but due to inflation, lower wages, fewer jobs, and higher taxes must turn to the government for some form of assistance.
>
> When it comes to crippling regulations to burden private enterprise, the Obama Administration is leading the charge to squash industry in favor of increasing government's power and reach.
>
> New greenhouse gas regulations will cost $300 to $400 billion per year and increase gas prices. The President's insane "cow tax" will hit more than 37,000 farms and ranches and 90% of American livestock production. Obama's attempt to stop hydraulic fracking for natural gas has more than a dozen federal agencies developing new, expensive regulations to prevent energy companies from drilling. His war on the coal industry will continue, costing as much as $110 billion over the next two decades and killing more than 300,000 jobs in Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Missouri. So much for energy independence, and so much for job creation.
>
> Despite the President's assurance that costs won't go up and jobs won't be lost over Obamacare, the 16,000 IRS workers who will administer the tax provisions of the program will be very busy hitting millions where it hurts. According to the Heritage Foundation, the Congressional Budget Office analysis found that nearly 80 percent of those who'll face tax penalties would be making between $55,850 and $115,250. They will all see their taxes go up starting next year.
>
> Obama will add a $123 billion surtax on investment income, and new taxes on dividends despite the fact that more than half of all Americans invest in the market in one fashion or another. The $86 billion increase in the Medicare Payroll Tax is also coming down the pike, along with a $60 billion tax increase for health insurance companies.
>
> In another uniquely-Obama effort to allegedly reduce healthcare costs, the President is also going to increase taxes by $32 billion on people who already have comprehensive healthcare coverage -- because they have coverage. Of course, people who have coverage now that's not up to the government's standards will find their plans eliminated and forced to purchase more expensive coverage. He's even going to tax medical device manufacturers to the tune of $20 billion because apparently that will help make Americans healthier.
>
> In Obama's America, religious schools, hospitals and charities will be labeled as non-religious employers specifically because they serve the common good of society. Churches and other faith-based institutions will be forced to provide services and even hire employees based on government mandates rather than their own, deeply-held values and beliefs. If they don't, Obama's government will gladly step in with an expensive government backfill for the services.
>
> Here's the good news -- we can prevent Obama's America from becoming a reality. We can stop statism and collectivism from taking us from "one out of many" to one of the many nations whose governments' thirst for power and control led to the decline of great societies and nations. The choice is ours November 6, and the results of the election, whichever way they go, will resonate for generations to come.
>
> About the Author
>
> Ned Ryun is the founder and president of American Majority, a political training institution. His "With the Tea Partiers" column run each month in the The American Spectator's print edition. You can follow him on Twitter @nedryun.
>
> http://spectator.org/archives/2012/10/26/obamas-real-second-term-plan
>
>
> Subject: Your future if we do not change this on November 6th
>
>
> Please read the below and pass on to anyone that you think might vote for this idiot. To the best of my knowledge I do not know anyone that would, but you may. Thanks.
>
> Obama's Real Second Term Plan
>
> By Ned Ryun on 10.26.12 @ 6:08AM
>
> You won't recognize this country after his second term -- the obvious reason he's not telling you what he has in mind for it.
>
> Mitt Romney said it best in the last debate when he informed the President that, "attacking me isn't an agenda," which prompted the Obama campaign to immediately release what they call a plan for the second term. This 20-page repackaging of speeches notwithstanding, President Obama remains perhaps the only president in history to run for reelection who not only can't talk about his record but also can't discuss his real agenda for a second term.
>
> Now it's not that he can't because he doesn't have any ideas about what he wants to do. He does have big plans, but his vision of the future is profoundly different from that of most Americans. The America that Obama sees when he sits on the Truman Balcony at night and dreams about the next four years is radically altered reality for everyone. It should scare every American -- unless you happen to be getting Obama's free cell phone service.
>
> Obama would like everyone to believe that his second-term policies will address what he sees as the great inequalities and unfairness inherent in the American system. He wants to level the playing field. What he can't tell you -- and what most Americans are realizing -- is that leveling out America will reduce freedom, opportunity, income, innovation, and upward mobility in favor of a government-driven economy. With a government-driven society will come statism, and collectivism follows right on the heels of statism, which will destroy America.
>
> Here's the stark proof, keeping in mind that this is a mere snapshot of the "remaking" Obama has in store that will affect millions of American families and businesses. The President's proposed budget projects will have federal spending soaring to $5.820 trillion per year, making Obama the biggest government spender in the history of the world. With all the talk from the President about spending cuts to satisfy independent voters, the sum of all of Obama's spending over the next ten years could total more than $40 trillion that we simply don't have.
>
> We can't afford Washington's spending now. Do we really think only the wealthy will foot the bill for such dramatic increases in government expenditures? The President's proposals will drive $100 billion in tax hikes next year and more than $2 trillion in tax increases over the next 10 years hitting every American.
>
> With more than 40 million Americans on food stamps, welfare is the fastest-growing portion of the budget under Obama. Food stamp usage is up a staggering 46% and the cost of the program has increased by 72%. Over the next four years, the President is preparing to increase spending on these programs to enable the government to increase benefits and provide for an increasing share of the population.
>
> The slow creep of dependency will see a smaller middle class and a larger dependent class of not just the poor but individuals and families who once could afford to live without the government's help, but due to inflation, lower wages, fewer jobs, and higher taxes must turn to the government for some form of assistance.
>
> When it comes to crippling regulations to burden private enterprise, the Obama Administration is leading the charge to squash industry in favor of increasing government's power and reach.
>
> New greenhouse gas regulations will cost $300 to $400 billion per year and increase gas prices. The President's insane "cow tax" will hit more than 37,000 farms and ranches and 90% of American livestock production. Obama's attempt to stop hydraulic fracking for natural gas has more than a dozen federal agencies developing new, expensive regulations to prevent energy companies from drilling. His war on the coal industry will continue, costing as much as $110 billion over the next two decades and killing more than 300,000 jobs in Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Missouri. So much for energy independence, and so much for job creation.
>
> Despite the President's assurance that costs won't go up and jobs won't be lost over Obamacare, the 16,000 IRS workers who will administer the tax provisions of the program will be very busy hitting millions where it hurts. According to the Heritage Foundation, the Congressional Budget Office analysis found that nearly 80 percent of those who'll face tax penalties would be making between $55,850 and $115,250. They will all see their taxes go up starting next year.
>
> Obama will add a $123 billion surtax on investment income, and new taxes on dividends despite the fact that more than half of all Americans invest in the market in one fashion or another. The $86 billion increase in the Medicare Payroll Tax is also coming down the pike, along with a $60 billion tax increase for health insurance companies.
>
> In another uniquely-Obama effort to allegedly reduce healthcare costs, the President is also going to increase taxes by $32 billion on people who already have comprehensive healthcare coverage -- because they have coverage. Of course, people who have coverage now that's not up to the government's standards will find their plans eliminated and forced to purchase more expensive coverage. He's even going to tax medical device manufacturers to the tune of $20 billion because apparently that will help make Americans healthier.
>
> In Obama's America, religious schools, hospitals and charities will be labeled as non-religious employers specifically because they serve the common good of society. Churches and other faith-based institutions will be forced to provide services and even hire employees based on government mandates rather than their own, deeply-held values and beliefs. If they don't, Obama's government will gladly step in with an expensive government backfill for the services.
>
> Here's the good news -- we can prevent Obama's America from becoming a reality. We can stop statism and collectivism from taking us from "one out of many" to one of the many nations whose governments' thirst for power and control led to the decline of great societies and nations. The choice is ours November 6, and the results of the election, whichever way they go, will resonate for generations to come.
>
> About the Author
>
> Ned Ryun is the founder and president of American Majority, a political training institution. His "With the Tea Partiers" column run each month in the The American Spectator's print edition. You can follow him on Twitter @nedryun.
>
> http://spectator.org/archives/2012/10/26/obamas-real-second-term-plan
Oct 28, 2012 15:35:50 #
cameraniac
Loc: Huntingburg, Indiana
Well said, Frenchy. America....she desperately needs more people that are just like you and think as you do.
FRENCHY wrote:
Personaly ? don't care at all , first off , I did ... (show quote)
Oct 28, 2012 15:46:12 #
FRENCHY wrote:
Ok, it is a copy-paqste but very interesting at least for me and the millions who care for our Country
Its amazes me what ridiculous propagandized nonsense the tea party puts out, and astounds me that anyone actually thinks it's worth repeating. It's this kind of thing that makes me despair the species.......
Oct 28, 2012 15:48:35 #
The same could be said of the left & their propaganda...A President who is more concerned about appearing on TV programs than he is running the country...
Gnslngr wrote:
Its amazes me what ridiculous propagandized nonsense the tea party puts out, and astounds me that anyone actually thinks it's worth repeating. It's this kind of thing that makes me despair the species.......
FRENCHY wrote:
Ok, it is a copy-paqste but very interesting at least for me and the millions who care for our Country
Its amazes me what ridiculous propagandized nonsense the tea party puts out, and astounds me that anyone actually thinks it's worth repeating. It's this kind of thing that makes me despair the species.......
Oct 28, 2012 15:53:40 #
cameraniac
Loc: Huntingburg, Indiana
Gnslngr wrote:
Its amazing what ridiculous propagandized nonsense I put out and I'm astounded that anyone actually thinks it's worth reading........
So true and they don't....
Oct 28, 2012 16:23:43 #
cameraniac wrote:
So true and they don't....
Thank you. By posting what you did, you have proven my point - the juvenile and moronic mind of the simpleton.
I hope you don't actually vote.
Oct 28, 2012 17:07:16 #
Gnslngr wrote:
Its amazes me what ridiculous propagandized nonsense the tea party puts out, and astounds me that anyone actually thinks it's worth repeating. It's this kind of thing that makes me despair the species.......
FRENCHY wrote:
Ok, it is a copy-paqste but very interesting at least for me and the millions who care for our Country
Its amazes me what ridiculous propagandized nonsense the tea party puts out, and astounds me that anyone actually thinks it's worth repeating. It's this kind of thing that makes me despair the species.......
Some of you libs , deserve an occupation Nazi style ( maybe the next 4 years ) to make you understand what you have , even after that you will still be crying saying that it is a propaganda or a conspiracy
Oct 28, 2012 17:13:03 #
Just what are you trying to say here gumslngr? A person who graduates magna cum laude should in no way be considered inarticulate? That because a person is "book smart" they are the best at everything?
If that's the way you think life works, may it is you that is the moron here.
And tell me........why is it always the liberals on this forum who start the name calling. I did not call Obama anything bad in my first post yet you choose to call me a moron because you don't like my opinion. Go screw yourself.
If that's the way you think life works, may it is you that is the moron here.
And tell me........why is it always the liberals on this forum who start the name calling. I did not call Obama anything bad in my first post yet you choose to call me a moron because you don't like my opinion. Go screw yourself.
Gnslngr wrote:
quote=jkaye65 I can't tell for sure that an earpi... (show quote)
Oct 28, 2012 17:17:11 #
cat - t
Loc: Ind/Calif
Frenchy -
If you're only 40 then you weren't here in 1976 for 200 ..... 2000 minus 1976 = 24 plus 12 = 36 = 236
easy hunh?
cat - t
If you're only 40 then you weren't here in 1976 for 200 ..... 2000 minus 1976 = 24 plus 12 = 36 = 236
easy hunh?
cat - t
Oct 28, 2012 17:18:01 #
jkaye65 wrote:
Just what are you trying to say here gumslngr? A person who graduates magna cum laude should in no way be considered inarticulate? That because a person is "book smart" they are the best at everything?
If that's the way you think life works, may it is you that is the moron here.
If that's the way you think life works, may it is you that is the moron here.
Any man who has been president of the Harvard law review and a magna cum laude graduate of that same school cannot possibly be inarticulate. There may be many faults that he has but being inarticulate is not one of them. Calling him that makes one appear stupid, that's all.
Oct 28, 2012 18:41:32 #
Don't take it personally, jkaye65. "Moron" is gnslngr's new word, he has to use it in a sentence 10 times each day until it's in his memory.
Oct 28, 2012 18:49:29 #
Answer me this gumslngr. Isn't magna cum laude awarded when one graduates in the to 10% of their class? If so, I'm not so impressed. Plenty of people are booksmart and street dumb and can't function outside of the confines of the classroom without someone to hold their hand along the way.
However, I will gladly retract the "inarticulate" statement if you:
1) retract calling me a moron (I threw this in because I am pretty sure you are unable to comply because you are so egotistical),
2) can adequately you explain why Obama can't speak in public without his teleprompter, written text infront of him and/or possibly having an earpiece to help him out.
However, I will gladly retract the "inarticulate" statement if you:
1) retract calling me a moron (I threw this in because I am pretty sure you are unable to comply because you are so egotistical),
2) can adequately you explain why Obama can't speak in public without his teleprompter, written text infront of him and/or possibly having an earpiece to help him out.
Gnslngr wrote:
quote=jkaye65 Just what are you trying to say her... (show quote)
Oct 28, 2012 18:51:37 #
cameraniac
Loc: Huntingburg, Indiana
If in fact Frenchy had stated that he was 40, what you posted, might actually make sense.
cat - t wrote:
Frenchy -
If you're only 40 then you weren't here in 1976 for 200 ..... 2000 minus 1976 = 24 plus 12 = 36 = 236
easy hunh?
cat - t
If you're only 40 then you weren't here in 1976 for 200 ..... 2000 minus 1976 = 24 plus 12 = 36 = 236
easy hunh?
cat - t
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.