Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon lens info
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
May 11, 2021 11:02:10   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
I use it for wildlife. Need highest shutter speed and lowest ISO. Mine stays at 5.6.

The chart shows little difference at 500 mm, which it is also usually stuck on.

Reply
May 11, 2021 11:02:45   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
john maloney wrote:
What is the best f stop on a Nikon 200-500 lens


I shoot with that lens on a daily basis. It is sharp wide open but I have found that 6.3 is my sweet stop.
Try it, you may like it.
Best of luck to you with one of Nikon's finest lenses. You have made a great choice grasshopper.

Reply
May 11, 2021 11:05:35   #
via the lens Loc: Northern California, near Yosemite NP
 
If you are using the lens for wildlife it won't matter that the corners are not tack sharp, i.e., the "sweet spot," as you will most likely be centering the wildlife or using the rule of thirds. Mine is always at f/5.6 as I use it for birds in flight and other wildlife and as fast shutter speed is the most important factor for me.

Reply
 
 
May 11, 2021 11:32:30   #
kb6kgx Loc: Simi Valley, CA
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
A joke.
F. Scott Fitzgerald


What... someone didn’t get that?

Reply
May 11, 2021 12:14:44   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
john maloney wrote:
What is the best f stop on a Nikon 200-500 lens


It appears f5.6 and maybe f8, with enough light, are the ones that allow autofocus. Reviews seem to indicate manual focus is more difficult than desired and is much less successful in keepers. If I owned the lens, I would try to use it at f5.6 and f8 most of the time.

Reply
May 11, 2021 12:29:07   #
epd1947
 
CO wrote:
LensTip.com does extensive lens testing. This is the chart from their image resolution testing for the Nikon AF-S 200–500 mm f/5.6E ED VR. It has the best image resolution at f/8.


I seriously doubt that anyone’s eyes would be able to discern any difference in actual photos taken at f/5.6 through f/11, probably even at f/16. The issue I find with these charts is that the give the impression that one should always shoot at f/8 to avoid less than stellar results - but if normal views of a photograph will not discern a difference what does it matter?

Reply
May 11, 2021 13:20:12   #
cambriaman Loc: Central CA Coast
 
Defintely f.8. Great results.

Reply
 
 
May 11, 2021 14:00:29   #
Thomas902 Loc: Washington DC
 
"I seriously doubt that anyone’s eyes would be able to discern any difference in actual photos taken at f/5.6 through f/11, probably even at f/16 ...what does it matter?" epd1947 there is a VAST difference in the visual aesthetic between f/5.6 and f/16 or even f/11 for that matter with the AF-S 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR. Trust me, I have clients who demand subject isolation... Absolutely no excuses acceptable.

Since you don't shoot commercially for a living maybe you're naive here... And that's understandable since you claim to have managed a retail photo equipment entity for a decade and a half... Straight from your Apr 4, 2021 post "...I managed their (Cameta Camera) used equipment division for about 17 years..."

Please realize that commercial photography is likely one of the more competitive "Crafts" which one might choose to engage in i.e. practice... Commercial Photography is decidedly unique and not really closely related to equipment retail.

There is no way in hell I would shoot a league soccer match at f/16 UNLESS it was doing a team's "group shots" either on risers or half the team kneeling in the first row...

Below is an example of the stellar isolation possible at f/5.6 with the epic AF-S 200-500mm f/5.6 Nikkor.
This same capture would be a trash throwaway at f/16 with all the chaos of fans, cars and trucks cluttering the background area clearly visible...

Maybe do yourself a favor (and others here on UHH) by mastering commercial photography and bring that gift to the forums... Way too many sales persons and far too few actual commercial shooters here on UHH in my humble estimation... btw, you might try pitching your inferences on f/5.6 vs f/16 in the Sport Photographers forum epd1947 and see how much credibility it garners...

Yes I hold that there is a major difference between f/5.6 vs f/16... and so do my clients.
Wishing you all the best in your pursuit of commercial photography epd1947...
.

AF-S 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR on a Nikon D3 at f/5.6
AF-S 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR on a Nikon D3 at f/5.6...
(Download)

Reply
May 11, 2021 17:43:24   #
epd1947
 
Thomas902 wrote:
"I seriously doubt that anyone’s eyes would be able to discern any difference in actual photos taken at f/5.6 through f/11, probably even at f/16 ...what does it matter?" epd1947 there is a VAST difference in the visual aesthetic between f/5.6 and f/16 or even f/11 for that matter with the AF-S 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR. Trust me, I have clients who demand subject isolation... Absolutely no excuses acceptable.

Since you don't shoot commercially for a living maybe you're naive here... And that's understandable since you claim to have managed a retail photo equipment entity for a decade and a half... Straight from your Apr 4, 2021 post "...I managed their (Cameta Camera) used equipment division for about 17 years..."

Please realize that commercial photography is likely one of the more competitive "Crafts" which one might choose to engage in i.e. practice... Commercial Photography is decidedly unique and not really closely related to equipment retail.

There is no way in hell I would shoot a league soccer match at f/16 UNLESS it was doing a team's "group shots" either on risers or half the team kneeling in the first row...

Below is an example of the stellar isolation possible at f/5.6 with the epic AF-S 200-500mm f/5.6 Nikkor.
This same capture would be a trash throwaway at f/16 with all the chaos of fans, cars and trucks cluttering the background area clearly visible...

Maybe do yourself a favor (and others here on UHH) by mastering commercial photography and bring that gift to the forums... Way too many sales persons and far too few actual commercial shooters here on UHH in my humble estimation... btw, you might try pitching your inferences on f/5.6 vs f/16 in the Sport Photographers forum epd1947 and see how much credibility it garners...

Yes I hold that there is a major difference between f/5.6 vs f/16... and so do my clients.
Wishing you all the best in your pursuit of commercial photography epd1947...
.
"I seriously doubt that anyone’s eyes would b... (show quote)


No, I am not naive - my comment was strictly with regard to the "sweet spot" of the lens - As to the rest of your snarky remark - I did a fair amount of shooting professionally for more years than you are on the planet - so keep your asinine remarks to yourself.

Reply
May 11, 2021 19:23:01   #
sscnxy
 
Thomas902 wrote:
"What is the best f stop on a Nikon 200-500 lens" Best? Best for what John?
Like Stan said... "It depends upon what you are photographing." :)

What are you shooting it on John? This lens is a different animal on DX as apposed to FX... It vignettes badly wide open on FX however vignette is virtually absent at f/5.6 on DX... Again it depends John on what your perceived "Best" means.

I have and shoot this lens... Initially I purchased it with hopes to use for shooting league soccer... Sadly it was a major fail in that arena. While it did stellar if the player was moving parallel to the sensor plane it simply could not pull those massive glass elements quick enough for a player running a top speed directly at you... Which btw is the money shot in soccer since you have the eyes and ball in the frame... Both are critical components if you want to exceed client expectations. My soccer lens of choice now is an AF 300mm f/2.8 prime... and my "keeper" rate increased by several orders of magnitude...

So I retired the AF-S 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR to the studio (see below) where it is absolutely epic for beauty genre... Here I shoot it exactly like a 300mm prime at f/10... After testing my copy 300mm proved to be optimum for Beauty Genre at portraiture distance. And the incredible 4 to 5 stops of VR allows me the freedom of hand-holding.

Great lens... excellent worth/value especially for static subjects or those moving parallel to your focal plane.
Best Advice? Learn how to test you glass... Don't rely on hearsay... Way too many uncorroborated opinions here and on other forums. What works for your particular kit, your visual statement and most importantly your clients works! Period! And the issue of "sample" variation can (and often does) influence the IQ equations... Please test you glass carefully John.

Hope this helps John... or is at least food for thought...
All the best on your photographic journey...
.
"What is the best f stop on a Nikon 200-500 l... (show quote)


hit
Hello Thomas. I always like to learn something about lighting when I study the catchlights in your marvelous portraits. In this photo, was the key light a beauty dish directly in front of and above the model? And was the fill light a gridded octabox directly in front of and below the model?

Thanks.
NY

Reply
May 11, 2021 20:28:35   #
Thomas902 Loc: Washington DC
 
"...was the key light a beauty dish directly in front of and above the model?" Yes NY good eye... This actually is a single light setup... and the key is actually a strobe fired into a small 28" silver octa parabolic which yields the same focused beam as a BD. Fill was added with a 30x40 inch white foam core just out of frame up against her left arm... You can count the 8 silver panels in her pupils and see the white foam core also reflected in her lower pupils...

The foam core reflector makes a considerable difference in the aesthetic of this look... filling in the shadows in her neck. Oh the background is simply a 4'x8' panel of white foam core... and just far enough away to yield gray without detail...

However it is the model who took this narrative totally over the top... She is formerly with Elite Model Management in NYC... btw, she is also a very gifted cello player and is finishing her college degree in the performing arts...

Hope this helps NY... and thanks so much for the kind words... they are truly cherished..

Reply
 
 
May 11, 2021 21:15:01   #
hrblaine
 
Thomas902 wrote:
"...was the key light a beauty dish directly in front of and above the model?" Yes NY good eye... This actually is a single light setup... and the key is actually a strobe fired into a small 28" silver octa parabolic which yields the same focused beam as a BD. Fill was added with a 30x40 inch white foam core just out of frame up against her left arm... You can count the 8 silver panels in her pupils and see the white foam core also reflected in her lower pupils...

The foam core reflector makes a considerable difference in the aesthetic of this look... filling in the shadows in her neck. Oh the background is simply a 4'x8' panel of white foam core... and just far enough away to yield gray without detail...

However it is the model who took this narrative totally over the top... She is formerly with Elite Model Management in NYC... btw, she is also a very gifted cello player and is finishing her college degree in the performing arts...

Hope this helps NY... and thanks so much for the kind words... they are truly cherished..
"...was the key light a beauty dish directly ... (show quote)


It's nice to see a couple of guys getting along here for a change. Way too many snarky comments going back and forth between posters imho. Harry

Reply
May 11, 2021 22:04:02   #
fstoprookie Loc: Central Valley of California
 
Thanks for info - I'm going to shoot a baseball game on Thursday and have never used my 200-500 for a game. Going to give it a shot. It'll be in mid afterenoon so somewhere around f8 will be pretty good. Anxious to see what I come up with. Only shot with it half a dozen times and have been waiting to shoot sports event in the daylight.

Never thought about shooting a portrait with it - Interesting

Reply
May 12, 2021 03:09:35   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
fstoprookie wrote:
Thanks for info - I'm going to shoot a baseball game on Thursday and have never used my 200-500 for a game. Going to give it a shot. It'll be in mid afterenoon so somewhere around f8 will be pretty good. Anxious to see what I come up with. Only shot with it half a dozen times and have been waiting to shoot sports event in the daylight.

Never thought about shooting a portrait with it - Interesting


Shooting in bright daylight should allow for f8 and good autofocus according to what I can find. You might even want to try f11 and see how well the autofocus works at that aperture.

Reply
May 12, 2021 07:46:42   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
wdross wrote:
Shooting in bright daylight should allow for f8 and good autofocus according to what I can find. You might even want to try f11 and see how well the autofocus works at that aperture.


Autofocus will work perfectly with the lens set to f/11 or any other aperture setting. It stops down only when the shutter is released.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.