Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
I have come to appreciate Van Gogh's delema!
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
May 9, 2021 08:22:12   #
srt101fan
 
traderjohn wrote:
He was an artist. He did not pretend to be a photographer.


Photography can produce art, as can woodworking, glass-blowing, embroidery, metalworking, leathercraft, pottery-making, landscaping, painting, etc, etc, etc.......

Reply
May 9, 2021 09:19:49   #
waldron7 Loc: State of Confusion
 
If you want exposure, offer your framed pictures to your local hospital to mount on their walls. Include your information on each piece. By doing this, I have had many inquiries and sales, enough to fund new equipment and several Caribbean vacations.

Reply
May 9, 2021 10:52:48   #
henrycrafter Loc: Orem Utah
 
Delderby wrote:
You should not be depressed - were your pics well displayed? were there comparable pics by other artists? was the show well attended? did you try putting a "sold" sticker on one or two of your prints?


I am not depressed. I am merely stating what I believe to be fact as applied to me

Reply
 
 
May 9, 2021 10:57:07   #
Mark Sturtevant Loc: Grand Blanc, MI
 
There is far, far too much competition out there. But it is still right to feel frustrated.
An outlet of sorts can be to put pictures up for sale through an online stock photo site. Like Adobe Stock Photo, Shutterstock, etc. You generally won't make much more than pennies on a sale, but it would still feel kind of good. The trick is volume, though. If you post only a few dozen pictures, likely nothing will happen.

Reply
May 9, 2021 10:59:33   #
Rae Zimmerman Loc: Pine Island, FL
 
In the days of SLR photography, there was less photographic productivity. Photographers rationed their photos due to film capacity limitations. Shutter activation wasn't measured in FPS, resulting in fewer photos per event or sighting. Cameras didn't allow as much experimentation with techniques, unless you had the film budget for it. And in general, photography was a less common hobby for people.
With the switch to DSLR (and mirrorless) photography, it seems everyone who wants to is out taking pictures. The number of purchase-worthy, interest-worthy, eye-worthy photos has increased by far...but I bet our willingness to spend money on such purchases hasn't kept up. After all, we only have so much wall space to exhibit photographic work. And we are more anxious to exhibit our own work in that space!
In conclusion, don't judge public appreciation of your carefully, insightfully, artistically executed work on the basis of whether it sells or not. The market is glutted. Instead, get your validation from those comments and non-verbal signals of those who do stop and look at your work!

Reply
May 9, 2021 11:43:00   #
pendennis
 
Accumulation of money or wealth can't be pursued directly; if you do you will be sorely disappointed. At least that's what one of my finance professors told our class, some 45 years ago.

I applied the same logic to my photography, both professionally and as an amateur. I photograph what pleases my eyes, and if I'm rewarded for my effort, so much the better. I've entered what I deemed were great photographs in contests, and have been disappointed to see what I considered inferior and banal work of others to be rewarded, and mine virtually ignored.

When shooting professionally, I always gave the client, whether portraits, weddings, etc., what they wanted, and my clients were always pleased. Did that grind against my taste? In some cases, yes. But clients were paying the tab, so they got what they asked for. At the same time, I would include some of my interpretations, and in many instances the clients liked mine over theirs, but if not, no great shakes.

After all, it is art...

Reply
May 9, 2021 16:04:09   #
RodeoMan Loc: St Joseph, Missouri
 
I knew a fellow who priced his work at too high of a price. If his work had been priced at a lower price and it didn't sell, this would have indicated that people weren't buying it because they didn't like it . However when priced beyond what people would be willing to pay, he avoided coming face to face with the possibility that maybe people just didn't care for his work.

Reply
 
 
May 9, 2021 20:26:05   #
fantom Loc: Colorado
 
henrycrafter wrote:
Van Gogh committed suicide at age 35. I have come to appreciate his dilema. He was creating fabulous art work and nobody was buying it. Having struggled with the same issues most of my life I relate to him. NO I AM NOT contemplating suicide. What I see is the frustration of working your heart out to create a work of art and having no-one place a valid monetary value on it. I have come to the conclusion that if you don't do it for the pleasure of creating it you are kidding yourself.
Your comments are welcome
Van Gogh committed suicide at age 35. I have come ... (show quote)


I hear what you are saying but think there may be other possibilities or circumstances.

By that time in his life he was living in "his own world" and I doubt if he was particularly interested in the monetary value of his paintings. His brother was buying all of his paintings and VVG's reality did not include the cold hard facts of the economics involved.

He was an extremely complicated person with severe mental problems that made separating reality from "reality" very difficult or impossible for him. I personally think that he was doing it for the pleasure it gave him and he thought he was supporting himself through his work. It is my understanding that he did not know Theo was not selling them. He also had many serious distractions that added to his problems and depressed him that could have led to his death. There has been much speculation about what actually happened.

Reply
May 10, 2021 09:42:54   #
Tomcat5133 Loc: Gladwyne PA
 
Art that commands money is a big business today. I went to Art Basel twice
when I was living recently in FL. Last year a piece of garbage duct taped to a wall
sold for 6 figures by a known artist. I follow Satchi and other sellers.
Collectors are buying for investments. And some can afford to pay outrageous
prices like a trophies. And ego trip.

As for photography and graphic photography most museums of shows
dedicated to photo artists. Camera creations are art. And maybe the most
interesting in telling a story. Displaying things like lifestyles and culture
to the rest of the world. Enjoy art it is one of the gifts in life.

Reply
May 12, 2021 17:26:26   #
Shel B
 
I found out long ago that it is tough to sell photos as art. It's best just to shoot to please yourself.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.