Systemic Racism: Gee, wonder why none of the anti-white racists report on this: https://www.pnas.org/content/116/32/15877 Bottom line of actual research data: “ We find no evidence of...

IDguy Loc: Idaho

Gee, wonder why none of the anti-white racists report on this: https://www.pnas.org/content/116/32/15877

Bottom line of actual research data: “ We find no evidence of anti-Black or anti-Hispanic disparities across shootings, and White officers are not more likely to shoot minority civilians than non-White officers.”

rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona

It certainly is a very interesting report. Additionally, from a rather reputable source.
--Bob

IDguy wrote:

Gee, wonder why none of the anti-white racists report on this: https://www.pnas.org/content/116/32/15877

Bottom line of actual research data: “ We find no evidence of anti-Black or anti-Hispanic disparities across shootings, and White officers are not more likely to shoot minority civilians than non-White officers.”

IDguy Loc: Idaho

rmalarz wrote:

It certainly is a very interesting report. Additionally, from a rather reputable source.
--Bob

I stumbled on it when trying to find out if more white or black police shoot blacks. It went beyond what I was looking for.

I’m annoyed they totally exonerated the Capitol police officer who killed the unarmed white woman in the Capitol melee. They refuse to identify him or her. There is a better than even chance the killer was black so it doesn’t match the left media false narrative. No news there.

Hodge Loc: England

Biden says systemic racism is rife, he is the man to save all you non-white folks from it, and he should know having spent the last 40 years in politics helping to create the system.

soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca

Hodge wrote:

Biden says systemic racism is rife, he is the man to save all you non-white folks from it, and he should know having spent the last 40 years in politics helping to create the system.

Biden a racist...........nooooooo

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

IDguy wrote:

I stumbled on it when trying to find out if more white or black police shoot blacks. It went beyond what I was looking for.

I’m annoyed they totally exonerated the Capitol police officer who killed the unarmed white woman in the Capitol melee. They refuse to identify him or her. There is a better than even chance the killer was black so it doesn’t match the left media false narrative. No news there.

When you don't have the facts, just make them up.
You must be a republican.

SteveR Loc: Michigan

Frank T wrote:

When you don't have the facts, just make them up.
You must be a republican.

I studied the statistics a couple of years ago and related them to a black friend. She didn't care what the statistics said. Notice, too, that all of the high profile shootings that make the news are of blacks. Shootings of whites just don't seem to be that newsworthy.

IDguy Loc: Idaho

Frank T wrote:

When you don't have the facts, just make them up.
You must be a republican.

I assume this is a cynical observation referring to the lefts unfounded assertions of systemic racism.

Interesting how the lefties seem to have have run for cover on this one. Usually facts don’t affect them.

IDguy Loc: Idaho

SteveR wrote:

I studied the statistics a couple of years ago and related them to a black friend. She didn't care what the statistics said. Notice, too, that all of the high profile shootings that make the news are of blacks. Shootings of whites just don't seem to be that newsworthy.

Yes, and there are many more white killings by police.

The numbers illustrate the severe underreporting by the press. And unfortunately many dimwits relate the cherry picked incidents reported on in depth over and over to some kind of trend. The only trend is the left propaganda.

btbg

rmalarz wrote:

It certainly is a very interesting report. Additionally, from a rather reputable source.
--Bob

Interesting isn't it that Frank has not attacked the source like is normal when evidence is presented that does not support the liberal narrative.

This is the same kind of thing as the believe that women do not get compensated at work at the same level as men. When all of the data is looked at you get the same kind of results and it refutes the liberal narrative.

That's why they never use all of the data and only cherry pick what is most useful to inflame and incite the masses.

IDguy Loc: Idaho

I expected the lefties to jump in and argue that the minority killings are a much larger percent of the respective minority populations (excepting Asians...another recent false left propaganda item). The killings are in proportion to the number of criminals by race and to the number of police killed by race of killer (actually less!)

https://ucr.fbi.gov/leoka/2014/tables/table_47_leos_fk_race_and_sex_of_known_offender_2005-2014.xls

Of course then they’d argue (with no proof like this article) that is evidence of systemic racism. I suspect a study like this would show it is a culture problem and not a race issue.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

btbg wrote:

Interesting isn't it that Frank has not attacked the source like is normal when evidence is presented that does not support the liberal narrative.

This is the same kind of thing as the believe that women do not get compensated at work at the same level as men. When all of the data is looked at you get the same kind of results and it refutes the liberal narrative.

That's why they never use all of the data and only cherry pick what is most useful to inflame and incite the masses.

Where is your evidence that women are paid at the same rate as men? If I had agreed with you up to that point, that statement would have woken me up.

boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander

Women who do the same jobs as men MUST by law be paid equally. But the disparities in income have some of these reasons- men may have been on those jobs longer (senority). May work longer hours more willing to work overtime.. Risen to a higher level (premotions). Take less time off. (child care). So men are paid more than women. But there may be valid reasons

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

boberic wrote:

Women who do the same jobs as men MUST by law be paid equally. But the disparities in income have some of these reasons- men may have been on those jobs longer (senority). May work longer hours more willing to work overtime.. Risen to a higher level (premotions). Take less time off. (child care). So men are paid more than women. But there may be valid reasons

May be? Are there or aren't there?

Hodge Loc: England

I find it amusing when woketards argue about different treatment of men and women while arguing that there is no difference between men and women and that gender being a social construct is simply a matter of choice.

If you don't think you are being paid enough as one gender choose one of the other 52.

I laughed my ass off watching a video of a non-binary thing moaning about planned parenthood treating it as a woman while it was having an abortion (at least the gene pool dodged that bullet).