I had a first time experience recently. My wife and I recently stayed at the Fairmont Princess hotel in Scottsdale, AZ. We were there about 12 days. On the second to last day I was stopped by hotel security and told I was not allowed to have “professional cameras” on property. I sad a Sony a9 with a 200-600 mm lens. The property is beautiful with lots of wildlife to shoot. I’ve stayed there 4 or 5 times in the past with no problems. Security told me only cell phones were allowed.
I went and talked to a manager and was told that policy has been in effect for about 10 years. The manager further stated that no pro camera policies are in effect at almost all hotels. Something to do with social media and private property. Maybe they think I’m going to take some sort of voyeur shots. I don’t know. All the staff at the hotel were unaware of the policy and were dumbfounded when I told them what I was told. Never saw it expressed on their website either.
Any one else ever run into this issue?
At the Trump Hotel in Washington, DC they have the same policy. I found it hard to understand why cell phone pics were ok but not “professional” cameras. The clock tower over the hotel is run by the Parks Service and photography was fine there. However when we went into the main lobby it was a no-no to even be holding a camera. I was able to take pictures of the lobby from inside the glass walls of the elevator but that was it.
Mi630 wrote:
I had a first time experience recently. My wife and I recently stayed at the Fairmont Princess hotel in Scottsdale, AZ. We were there about 12 days. On the second to last day I was stopped by hotel security and told I was not allowed to have “professional cameras” on property. I sad a Sony a9 with a 200-600 mm lens. The property is beautiful with lots of wildlife to shoot. I’ve stayed there 4 or 5 times in the past with no problems. Security told me only cell phones were allowed.
I went and talked to a manager and was told that policy has been in effect for about 10 years. The manager further stated that no pro camera policies are in effect at almost all hotels. Something to do with social media and private property. Maybe they think I’m going to take some sort of voyeur shots. I don’t know. All the staff at the hotel were unaware of the policy and were dumbfounded when I told them what I was told. Never saw it expressed on their website either.
Any one else ever run into this issue?
I had a first time experience recently. My wife an... (
show quote)
Not here. We were down in Orlando a year ago at Universal's Cabana Bay Resort and I was all over the grounds taking pictures without a single issue.
On the other hand, I am not a professional, therefore my camera identifies as a 'hobby camera'.
Hard understand that policy. Surreptitious pictures would be much easier to take with a cell phone.
To me this is crazy, I could see them asking you not to take a picture in or around the hotel, but to treat any camera as a contraband is insane. Can they confiscate a camera under their policy? Does owning a camera automatically define you as a professional photographer? If they did not post their regulations then do they have a legal right?
Unfortunate. But, remember it's private property and they can invent and enforce whatever rule they desire, just like you can tell people to take of their shoes in your house. Consider remembering to bring your pocket camera, like a Canon G9X, that captures in 20MP in RAW and delivers results about as professional as any DSLR. MLB has a similar policy based on length of the lens. I always make sure to have my 70-300 lens compacted to fall under any '6 inch' rules when entering the park, even though the lens will exceed that limit when employed at 300mm.
I have not run into that issue. However, I can understand their reticence to have people photographing the insides and grounds. After all, hotels are private property. That said, I can find objection to being told I can't even carry my camera from my room to a vehicle to go somewhere to photograph. They also have to realize that I'm a guest.
--Bob
Mi630 wrote:
I had a first time experience recently. My wife and I recently stayed at the Fairmont Princess hotel in Scottsdale, AZ. We were there about 12 days. On the second to last day I was stopped by hotel security and told I was not allowed to have “professional cameras” on property. I sad a Sony a9 with a 200-600 mm lens. The property is beautiful with lots of wildlife to shoot. I’ve stayed there 4 or 5 times in the past with no problems. Security told me only cell phones were allowed.
I went and talked to a manager and was told that policy has been in effect for about 10 years. The manager further stated that no pro camera policies are in effect at almost all hotels. Something to do with social media and private property. Maybe they think I’m going to take some sort of voyeur shots. I don’t know. All the staff at the hotel were unaware of the policy and were dumbfounded when I told them what I was told. Never saw it expressed on their website either.
Any one else ever run into this issue?
I had a first time experience recently. My wife an... (
show quote)
azted
Loc: Las Vegas, NV.
These rules make no sense, due to the fact that all of these hotels partially exist on tourists. As a tourist, I take my camera to get photos of sights that I have travelled thousands of miles to see. If I cannot take my camera with me, I might not want to go, and they would lose my business. As a 25 year resident of Scottsdale, I used to go to the Princess when they had tennis tournaments, and actually worked at several as a volunteer usher. I do not remember seeing cameras at the events. It is possible that the Fairmont Princess still has the event attitude (lots of celebrities around) , and that was part of the reason the rule exists.
I wonder how they determine what is "professional". Is it the ability to change lenses?
tradio wrote:
I wonder how they determine what is "professional". Is it the ability to change lenses?
That's the definition I've encountered in similar situations. Easy enough for non-photographer staff to use when assessing equipment they encounter.
tradio wrote:
I wonder how they determine what is "professional". Is it the ability to change lenses?
Looks big and cool???
Not a "pocket" camera?
Having a battery grip must make it even
more professional...
I'm happier respecting the rights of private property owner's than whining about it.
Been to lots of hotels, some pretty fancy, with my Df. Never an issue - they probably thought it was a film camera.
At one time you couldn't have a camera at the race tracks in NY. The reasoning was that too many of their high dollar clients either should have been somewhere else, or been there with someone else.I think the same holds true today in casinos.
----
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.