Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon 80-400 with vr
Page <prev 2 of 2
Mar 26, 2021 14:31:06   #
Photomac Loc: The Dalles, Or
 
All good comments. I have the 80-400. It was sub-optimal until it quit working. Sent it to Tech repair, near B&H. It returned working better than new. Sharp and reasonably fast. I think the essence of this issue is accurately understanding it's purpose in your photography. Its a great walk around lens for subjects reasonably close, but clearly falls off at distance. I've had a Tamron 150-600 and found it too slow for BIF, missing as many as 50% while on the Amazon. I was not happy. After researching the issue, again I bought the 80-400 and it worked for its purpose. I have a 200-400 and a 600. They both do the job for a dedicated task at distance, both too heavy for a walk around. There a very good reviews of the Sigma 150-600, and I think better than the Nikon 200-500 in both lens/image quality and durability. Good luck.

Reply
Mar 26, 2021 15:28:16   #
willy6419
 
Thanks

It sucks having a budget, but wanting the best knowing practical pricing have compromises

I’ll test the top recommendations

Thanks

Reply
Mar 26, 2021 19:29:49   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
Rick from NY wrote:
I owned the original D version and it was slow to AF and not particularly sharp. Seldom used it for moving subjects. When the new one came out, I got one and it was a giant improvement. I use it regularly with my D500 and D850 when need to limit weight and need zoom capability. I find it exceptionally sharp and very fast and accurate AF, but very expensive. I have not compared it with the 200-500 or any of the off brand models. However, it is not like my 400/2.8 in AF speed or IQ, but not much out there is equal to the 400/2.8.

I have never fully bought in to the crop factor argument though. With the large size files from the D850, I can and do crop in to a D850 image to create a result similar to the crop effect of the dx body. I bought a D500 to have a smaller, lighter alternative to the 850 and also to carry as a second body. I find the hi iso performance of the 850 to be a lot better than the 500, so I often shoot with the 850 and crop rather than 500 if light is an issue.

And please don’t let the pro/con argument about crop factor overtake the discussion of the lens. My conclusions are based on my hands on tests of what works for me.
I owned the original D version and it was slow to... (show quote)



Reply
 
 
Mar 26, 2021 23:50:13   #
shutterbob Loc: Tucson
 
The 80-400 D is a pretty good lens, and you can find good used ones for $400 or less. It is reasonably sharp. Auto focus is VERY slow. Found it to be useless for BIF shots. The newer AFS lens is much quicker but is expensive. I would rather (for less money) look at the 200-500 or a Tamron 150-600 G2.

Reply
Mar 27, 2021 00:06:46   #
willy6419
 
Thanks

Reply
Mar 27, 2021 02:01:45   #
alphadog
 
Owned the 200 500, maybe a bad copy, who can know... bottom line: not sharp certain distances and at 300 even when tuned IN... compared to a friends 300 Star prime lens was NOT in the same ballpark. I bought it new from B&H and returned it for the nikon 300 f4...which was as sharp as my friends, if NOT sharper.

I learned several things: Primes are always sharper than zooms, many of the Thailand zooms may not be good copies... since that time, I ONLY buy primes, I do know others have good luck and images with their zooms..

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.