Bultaco wrote:
I use the FF 70-300 and love it. The FF has manual focus, the DX don't. If shooting wildlife in cover manual focus can't be beat.
I believe the dx version is like M-A mode.As soon as you turn the focusing ring you are in manual focus. No switches involved.
---
The DX doesn't have a focus ring.
trapper1 wrote:
I tried a couple of 400s belonging to friends but could not get them stable enough at the long end when hand-held, still too much quiver. Around 300 steady but beyond that the motion became much more obvious. I do not want to be confined to shooting from a rest so I figure the 300 is my best compromise.
Might need to up the shutter speed at 400.
imagemeister wrote:
Keep your 18-200 and add a 70-300 Nikkor or 100-400 Tamron. There are two versions of the current Nikkor 70-300 - one is DX and the other FX. The FX is a better investment if are a serious shooter.
.
I agree with the above recommendation. I will add to it "a Nikon 300mm f4 pf prime lens. Small, light weight and its image quality is excellent. "
The 18-300 does have a focus ring, the 70-300 DX does not.
I stand corrected, your correct.
Bultaco wrote:
I stand corrected, your correct.
No problem.
I kept checking because I couldn't imagine Nikon selling this type of lens without manual focus.
Now, if the cameras had a good, old fashioned, focusing screen it might be interesting.
Stay well!
--
Bill_de wrote:
No problem.
I kept checking because I couldn't imagine Nikon selling this type of lens without manual focus.
Now, if the cameras had a good, old fashioned, focusing screen it might be interesting.
Stay well!
--
I'd love to have the old split image.
Bill_de wrote:
I believe the dx version is like M-A mode.As soon as you turn the focusing ring you are in manual focus. No switches involved.
---
That is correct. I have the 18-300 Nikkor DX and you can just turn the focus ring when in auto focus mode and it goes into manual override.
In fact I only got it last year when I traded in a Nikkor 55-300 to buy it new. I didn’t use it much if just going out with one lens.
I like it as a general walkabout lens when out and about on a walk and not taking any other lenses. I’ve only got a D5100 from new in 2011 so maybe my requirements are different to others.
I really could do with a newer model
Bultaco wrote:
I'd love to have the old split image.
Yes I much prefer the old split image as I had on my Pentax ME Super! Much easier to focus.
"... I see that there are two options listed in my price range, a 18-300 and a 28-300..." While this may be true Trapper they are both "old tech" and heavy... I have still have the 28-300 which I use on my D3 and D700 where it does a decent job. However I sold my 18-300 immediately after picking up the rare but "precious" Sigma 50-150mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM APO Lens for Nikon F which I currently shoot on my D7200 (see below). DxOMark stated that this incredible Sigma was absolutely the best performing DX optic in the FX equivalent range of 70-200mm. I would swap your aging 18-200mm variable aperture relic for this stellar Sigma.
As for reaching the 300mm mark? The Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E VR AF-P is my choice in your price range. It out preforms it's competitors by quite a bit... Here's an excellent synopsis of this consumer grade lens that out preforms way above it's pricing level.
https://photographylife.com/reviews/nikon-70-300mm-vr-af-pSince you're shooting DX below is an example of this FX "P" variant on a D7200.
btw, the cheap AF-P f/4.5-6.3 DX version while "cute" isn't at the same level... I have both.
Now if you really have a need for speed then an AF 300mm f/2.8 is pretty much the ultimate (see below)
Or if you have very deep pockets and go for the AF 200mm f/2 Nikkor which btw is much cherished.
Hope this helps Trapper...
All the best on your photographic journey.
.
Nikon D7200; 1/1600; f/8; ISO: 450; FL 100mm Lens: AF-P 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E VR Nikkor
(
Download)
Nikon D7200; with the Sigma 50-150mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM APO Lens
(
Download)
AF 300mm f/2.8 optic
(
Download)
I have the Nikkor 18-300 and use it as my travel lens. I keep seeing posts that it's heavy. I don't think it is particularly heavy and I carry it around my neck all day long. I am not sure you will see a lot of difference between a 200 mm zoom and 300 mm. Frankly, traveling I use it mostly in the 18-150 mm range. It's not all that often I extend all the way, but it's certainly handy when I want to zoom in a far away object. But, I do think you give up sharpness.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.