I really like the new page layout!!!
It makes it much easier to keep the post separate with these old eyes!!
MY thanks to the Powers That Be.
Frank
I like the green, separates things better.
Yes - Kudos on the latest version of the CSS.
The new look is fine.
I would like very much though to increase the font size.
It would be so much easier to read.
And why is the window so narrow?
Who uses a 4/3 screen any longer.
Mr. SONY wrote:
The new look is fine.
I would like very much though to increase the font size.
It would be so much easier to read.
And why is the window so narrow?
Who uses a 4/3 screen any longer.
You can set to use your wider screen in your profile...just choose not to limit the width.
Mr. SONY wrote:
The new look is fine.
I would like very much though to increase the font size.
It would be so much easier to read.
And why is the window so narrow?
Who uses a 4/3 screen any longer.
1. Try CTL+ in your browser.
2. So things don't wrap on narrower/square screens.
(I had a square screen up to last year when it dies. SOME people DO have square screens still.)
3. It should be tailored to your screen? Why are you assuming no one has a 4/3 screen (or square) anymore?
(I'm NOT changing my website... It is what it is, and it will stay that way.)
Shrink your browser window?
Live with it? This is not the ONLY site around that doesn't fill a Panavision monitor.
larryepage wrote:
You can set to use your wider screen in your profile...just choose not to limit the width.
Thank You!!!
I looked right past that option ever since I found this wonder place.
2. So things don't wrap on narrower/square screens.
(I had a square screen up to last year when it dies. SOME people DO have square screens still.)
Wow, Haven't seen one of those in years.
I wonder now how many people are still using a Redactron RII word processer with it's portrait only monitor.
3. It should be tailored to your screen? Why are you assuming no one has a 4/3 screen (or square) anymore?
(I'm NOT changing my website... It is what it is, and it will stay that way.)
This is your site? Sorry.
Mr. SONY wrote:
2. So things don't wrap on narrower/square screens.
(I had a square screen up to last year when it dies. SOME people DO have square screens still.)
Wow, Haven't seen one of those in years.
I wonder now how many people are still using a Redactron RII word processer with it's portrait only monitor.
3. It should be tailored to your screen? Why are you assuming no one has a 4/3 screen (or square) anymore?
(I'm NOT changing my website... It is what it is, and it will stay that way.)
This is your site? Sorry.
2. So things don't wrap on narrower/square screens... (
show quote)
THIS is not my site, but my site is "narrow" also, and will always be.
Re: Screen Aspect Ratio: If you don't use full size windows, screen proportion is irrelevant. It does help when a web site uses less of its available footprint so I can reduce my window size and still leave it readable.
OldIkon wrote:
Re: Screen Aspect Ratio: If you don't use full size windows, screen proportion is irrelevant. It does help when a web site uses less of its available footprint so I can reduce my window size and still leave it readable.
You mean like having multiple windows tiled on a screen?
Don't like it. Why fix something that isn't broke.
Gasman57 wrote:
Don't like it. Why fix something that isn't broke.
Me too, what was wrong with the other layout, better separation
Longshadow wrote:
THIS is not my site, but my site is "narrow" also, and will always be.
Well I checked out your site.
Looks great.
Good info too.
Mr. SONY wrote:
Well I checked out your site.
Looks great.
Good info too.
Thanks, I appreciate the checkout and comment.
(I keep thinking what else I might want to add, NOT trying to duplicate the million things already out there on the net.)
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.