Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
If a modern camera has a wide dynamic range why do I use HDR?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Mar 1, 2021 11:33:37   #
Vienna74 Loc: Bountiful, Utah now Panama
 
HDR exists because nature has an even wider dynamic range than camera sensors today.

Reply
Mar 1, 2021 15:54:27   #
rhudston Loc: Nova Scotia
 
Ysarex wrote:
I stopped messing with HDR some years ago. And yes that's because modern cameras now permit capturing raw files with 10+ stops of usable data. Secret? You've got to hand process the raw file, but we have excellent software now that makes that job pretty easy.

I don't shoot room interiors but I do enjoy shooting very high contrast landscapes/cityscapes. I just grabbed my camera and took a sample snap. Turned off all the room lights and shot right into the window -- pretty extreme scene contrast. RawDigger says I'm working with 11 stops of data.

First photo below is the camera's metered JPEG.
Second photo below is the camera's JPEG from the raw file I chose to process. Highlights in this JPEG are still clipped by the camera software.
Third photo below is the processed raw file.
I stopped messing with HDR some years ago. And yes... (show quote)


I'm impressed - I'm an old film hobby photographer getting into the amazing possibilities of new cameras. HDR looks like it opens up a whole new world for me. Would you please go into a little more depth about how you achieved your third image?

Reply
Mar 1, 2021 16:03:54   #
Ysarex Loc: St. Louis
 
rhudston wrote:
I'm impressed - I'm an old film hobby photographer getting into the amazing possibilities of new cameras. HDR looks like it opens up a whole new world for me. Would you please go into a little more depth about how you achieved your third image?


The third image is not HDR. I simply edited the raw file. It was necessary to create some masks -- luminance and hand painted -- to apply different amounts of tone/color adjustment to different sections of the image. I used the raw converter Capture One which makes a task like that pretty fast and easy.

Reply
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Mar 1, 2021 16:05:18   #
bwana Loc: Bergen, Alberta, Canada
 
twosummers wrote:
I am a real estate photographer and never 100% happy with my "window pulls". What intrigues me is that if I use (say) +3 0 and -3 brackets to cover the dynamic range of a room with a window (to capture the entire dynamic range) and then merge these images into a single HDR image I do get the range but with all of the problems of HDR which never quite produces a crisp image with accurate colours in many cases.

Using speedlights (or strobes) to light up the room can produce a better end product but takes more time.

Surely with modern cameras offering more than 6 stops of dynamic range why can I not just take a single image to reproduce what my eye sees (or nearly so)? Am I missing something?

IS there a secret out there or are we stuck with lengthy post production and/or lights / HDR / flambient?
I am a real estate photographer and never 100% hap... (show quote)

Six stops is pretty minimal compared to the human eye, at about 15-20 stops. HDR is the only option until a sensor with far greater dynamic range is developed.

bwa

Reply
Mar 1, 2021 16:41:37   #
Randad Loc: East Bethel, MN
 
Me too please

Reply
Mar 1, 2021 16:50:55   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
Ysarex wrote:
The third image is not HDR. I simply edited the raw file. It was necessary to create some masks -- luminance and hand painted -- to apply different amounts of tone/color adjustment to different sections of the image. I used the raw converter Capture One which makes a task like that pretty fast and easy.

It was also taken at the camera's base ISO of 64 where the Z7's dynamic range is at its maximum.

HDR is intended for situations where the camera's DR at base ISO is not enough to cover the scene's DR.

It helped that it was not sunny outside and that there is a screen in the window that reduced the brightness. Taken on a sunny day with the window open and no screen this would have been more of a challenge.

Reply
Mar 1, 2021 17:09:21   #
robertjerl Loc: Corona, California
 
Here is a good basic on doing HDR - this one they shot frames in RAW and combine in processing. Some cameras will do simple HDR in camera but this "hard way" will almost always get better results.

https://photographylife.com/landscapes/hdr-photography-tutorial

Oh, I forgot, some software will take a single frame and fake the HDR. Corel's Paintshop Pro will do it and so will some dedicated HDR software. But again, usually the multiple shot method does better.

Here are the out of camera and a Paintshop Pro HDR done by splitting the OOC and then recombining them that I did several years ago.
#1 OOC of a car engine at a car show
#2 The artificial HDR version

Yes the colors are funky, the new version of the software does better and the hard way with separate shots does better yet.


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
 
 
Mar 1, 2021 17:24:49   #
Dennis833 Loc: Australia
 
Your missing nothing. I've shot lots of interiors going back to the RZ67 days, polaroids and strobes. IMO the easiest way to shoot realestate interiors is to expose for the windows and keep the aperture around F5.6-F8 then bounce flash back behind the camera up into the corners of the ceiling. I used a large Metz flash with a simple small reflector attached. Every time I struck a dark wooden roof and shot HDRs I was never happy with the end result.

Reply
Mar 1, 2021 17:27:25   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
robertjerl wrote:
... Yes the colors are funky, the new version of the software does better and the hard way with separate shots does better yet.

Funky is what gives HDR a bad rep.

When it’s done more conservatively you can’t tell it’s HDR.

Reply
Mar 1, 2021 18:52:50   #
ronpier Loc: Poland Ohio
 
CO wrote:
Many scenes are beyond the dynamic range of the sensor in the camera. I had a very difficult time with the neon sign in this photo. The sign was always blown out. I finally had to bracket 7 exposures each 3-stops apart and merge them in Photomatix Pro.


Your end result is amazing.

Reply
Mar 2, 2021 10:25:17   #
risenhart Loc: New Hope,Minnesota
 
Has anyone used luminosity masks in Photoshop or the RayaPro app?

Reply
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Mar 2, 2021 10:27:23   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
I use them extensively, Raya Pro included.
--Bob
risenhart wrote:
Has anyone used luminosity masks in Photoshop or the RayaPro app?

Reply
Mar 2, 2021 10:33:07   #
risenhart Loc: New Hope,Minnesota
 
rmalarz wrote:
I use them extensively, Raya Pro included.
--Bob


Thanks Bob, I think I will roil up my sleeves and learn something new.

Dick

Reply
Mar 2, 2021 11:39:20   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
risenhart wrote:
Has anyone used luminosity masks in Photoshop or the RayaPro app?

I have used them in Capture One. They are part of the program, not an add-on feature.

Reply
Mar 2, 2021 11:51:47   #
mflowe Loc: Port Deposit, MD
 
risenhart wrote:
Has anyone used luminosity masks in Photoshop or the RayaPro app?


I use them on 90% of my images. They're not just for blending HDR images. You can make adjustments to specific tones in an image with perfect feathering. I use the TK panels developed by Tony Kuyper. Jimmy McIntyre has a free panel that's good if you don't want to get too complicated.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.