Ok, Constitutional Scholars (Page 7): We don’t know if trump committed a crime or not. That is only your opinion and nothing more. Let the trial decide...

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

smf85 wrote:

You are correct, and the burden of proof is on those who would claim otherwise.

We don’t know if trump committed a crime or not. That is only your opinion and nothing more.
Let the trial decide

Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida

Fotoartist wrote:

The only problem with your explanation is Nixon committed a crime for which he was pardoned and Trump did not commit a crime.

Obstruction of Justice is a Crime. Read Volume II of the Mueller Report.
Mueller further said that if Trump was not the President, he would be indicted.

smf85 Loc: Freeport, IL

DennyT wrote:

We don’t know if trump committed a crime or not. That is only your opinion and nothing more.
Let the trial decide

I thought that was what I said.

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

Kmgw9v wrote:

Obstruction of Justice is a Crime. Read Volume II of the Mueller Report.
Mueller further said that if Trump was not the President, he would be indicted.

You are proving once again you are full of it. You want to charge Trump for calling out the Mueller affair as a Political witch hunt for which it was. The only attempt at obstruction waged by Trump was Obstruction of "Injustice", since the original count was bogus and ultimately unproven B.S.

You will get to see what a real Quid Pro Quo is when Bite-Me goes on trial for what Trump originally called him out for.

forbescat

Former President Trump has been impeached twice for political and only political reasons. He has had one trial and was not found guilty. Now the democrats want another trial in hopes of telling millions of American voters who they are not allowed to vote for. What a trashy group the democrats are. Already in the Biden first weeks, our young girls are now going to lose their ability to compete in sports on a fair basis. They will be subjected to indecencies in bathrooms and locker rooms. If you have a daughter or granddaughter and you voted for Grandpa Gropes, shame on you.

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

forbescat wrote:

Former President Trump has been impeached twice fo... (show quote)

Transgender isn't one sided.

Grow up, and come out of the Dark Ages!

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

Fotoartist wrote:

You are proving once again you are full of it. You want to charge Trump for calling out the Mueller affair as a Political witch hunt for which it was. The only attempt at obstruction waged by Trump was Obstruction of "Injustice", since the original count was bogus and ultimately unproven B.S.

You will get to see what a real Quid Pro Quo is when Bite-Me goes on trial for what Trump originally called him out for.

For God's sake, put your brain back in and quit playing with it while there is still a chance it might recover.

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

Fotoartist wrote:

You are proving once again you are full of it. You want to charge Trump for calling out the Mueller affair as a Political witch hunt for which it was. The only attempt at obstruction waged by Trump was Obstruction of "Injustice", since the original count was bogus and ultimately unproven B.S.

You will get to see what a real Quid Pro Quo is when Bite-Me goes on trial for what Trump originally called him out for.

Furthermore the "Meuller Investigation" was not run by Meuller. Meuller proved in the Congessional hearings he was an empty cipher much like Biden. It was conducted by arch-Trump hater Andrew Weisman an incompetent Democrat shill and a dozen of his cohorts.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

Fotoartist wrote:

Furthermore the "Meuller Investigation" was not run by Meuller. Meuller proved in the Congessional hearings he was an empty cipher much like Biden. It was conducted by arch-Trump hater Andrew Weisman an incompetent Democrat shill and a dozen of his cohorts.

You know you're in trouble when the only way you can increase your count is to reply to yourself

foodie65

Blurryeyed wrote:

Vindictive BASTICHES you people. Unbelievable!

Let me ask, there is accumulating evidence mounting that Biden was actually selling the influence of his office to the Ukrainian oligarchs and the Chinese, what kind of punishment will you folks require for him, a man who actually did commit crimes against the nation other than having a political ideology different from yours?

Is this accumulating evidence in any way similar to the election fraud 'evidence'???

papakatz45 Loc: South Florida-West Palm Beach

foodie65 wrote:

Is this accumulating evidence in any way similar to the election fraud 'evidence'???

Answering a question with a question has always been a way to not answer the question.

foodie65

papakatz45 wrote:

Answering a question with a question has always been a way to not answer the question.

I'd still like to see the 'evidence' in both cases.

phcaan Loc: Willow Springs, MO

SteveR wrote:

Now that I've gone back to Article 1 Section 2, I do not see that there are two separate votes. Another question comes up. It says that two thirds of the senators must be present to vote. It doesn't say that a two thirds majority is required to convict. I've read elsewhere that a two thirds majority is required to convict. Where did that come from?

Not a problem, the honest Dems will allow mail in votes, and more than likely find many to convict days or weeks after the trial.

phcaan Loc: Willow Springs, MO

Blurryeyed wrote:

No, I am not sure that is exactly what it says, he... (show quote)

Now one of the interesting points of this second impeachment is the fact that Patrick Leahy will preside, rather than the Chief Justice of the supreme court. In lieu of the requirements laid down by the Constitution, I wonder how this will work?

papakatz45 Loc: South Florida-West Palm Beach

foodie65 wrote:

I'd still like to see the 'evidence' in both cases.

I think we all would agree with you but you still did not answer his question.