I have a question! (Page 8): Your point? Fight fire with fire?

Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum

Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰

Main Photography Discussion

I have a question!

Page <<first <prev 8 of 11 next> last>>

Jan 20, 2021 06:05:57 #

anotherview Loc: California

Your point? Fight fire with fire?

Jan 20, 2021 07:13:26 #

bodiebill

CHG_CANON wrote:

Deja vu all over again

some "camera-experienced people" seem to be much more helpful to "learners, and less experienced" inquirers of knowledge and technique.
Share your experience with class! Be kind to the inexperienced. Be helpful.
At one point in time, you were that inexperienced person!
If the subject bores you restrain from answering.

Jan 20, 2021 08:46:45 #

starlifter Loc: Towson, MD

If you have a camera body costing $$$$ and lens costing $$$$ and your settings all ok, you still need adjusting ?

Jan 20, 2021 09:21:01 #

awesome14 Loc: UK

jpg is a means to make image files small on the hard drive. The format is compressed on the drive, and expands in memory. It's a good way to fit a lot of photos on a disk drive, or camera storage. Raw is however the camera represents its reading directly off the sensor, before it converts it to jpg.
A digital photo artist or pro photog. would always prefer raw format. But if there's no requirement for editing, jpg works.

Jan 20, 2021 10:50:29 #

SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA

bodiebill wrote:

Missing the point. It’s clear the OP has no interest in actually learning anything as he keeps rehashing the same topic. He’s either a troll or too dense to actually learn anything.

Jan 20, 2021 12:04:55 #

w00dy4012 Loc: Thalia, East Virginia

SuperflyTNT wrote:

Missing the point. It’s clear the OP has no interest in actually learning anything as he keeps rehashing the same topic. He’s either a troll or too dense to actually learn anything.

Jan 20, 2021 12:23:30 #

kenArchi Loc: Seal Beach, CA

Doesn't the camera only take raw photos?

And you have a choice to output Jpeg,
Raw, or Raw+Jpeg?

So, choosing an output will determine the way you will take a picture?

Jan 20, 2021 14:22:42 #

Amator21 Loc: California

Did something hit a sore spot?

Jan 21, 2021 04:13:11 #

xposure

JPEGs have lower exposure range than raw chip eggs compress the image and therefore compress your exposure range and when you open it up it's very similar to what was really there but you did lose a little bit particularly in the shadows and it blocks up a little bit of the highlights it's not much but it is some if you shoot and raw and do a little bit of editing and then bring it into Photoshop you're better off bringing in as a tiff which doesn't compress and therefore doesn't lose any exposure range but eventually you're going to get to JPEG for transmitting and viewing universally on everything

Jan 21, 2021 06:51:53 #

billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont

xposure wrote:

JPEGs have lower exposure range than raw chip eggs... (show quote)

I can take a Jpeg image into the raw processing area of Photoshop and bring out all the highlight and shadow area's I need. I can do the same with a RAW image. It really does not matter for the work I do. Most of the time, 98%, I get the exposure right so I only need to do a little processing on my (Jpeg +) images.

Jan 21, 2021 08:42:44 #

SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA

xposure wrote:

JPEGs have lower exposure range than raw chip eggs... (show quote)

Speaking of editing, it’s often beneficial when writing also.

Jan 21, 2021 09:00:57 #

Picture Taker Loc: Michigan Thumb

RAW is a better set to fix your picture and JPG is what you use to print your picture. So if you good and don't need to repair your picture we just need JPG>

Jan 21, 2021 09:03:54 #