Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Why Raw? - An Example
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Jan 1, 2021 11:14:42   #
Hunter Lou 1947 Loc: Minnesota
 
On my camera setting on canon. Does it matter if I set both the Raw and JPG at the same time. Can I later adjust the raw picture if I don't like the JPG file? also, If I set both Raw and JPG on camera which picture size should i set the camera for. I've noticed that the picture size is hard to downsize if using both Raw and JPG. Maybe I don't understand the Photoshop program.

Reply
Jan 1, 2021 11:53:51   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
Hunter Lou 1947 wrote:
On my camera setting on canon. Does it matter if I set both the Raw and JPG at the same time. Can I later adjust the raw picture if I don't like the JPG file? also, If I set both Raw and JPG on camera which picture size should i set the camera for. I've noticed that the picture size is hard to downsize if using both Raw and JPG. Maybe I don't understand the Photoshop program.


It does not matter if you record both raw and jpg. Yes, you can use the raw if the jpg doesn't suit you.

The picture size setting on your camera defines the dimensions of the image in pixels, but only of the jpg. The raw file is not affected by picture size and will be full size. If you do something in Photoshop and want to save it, you have a couple choices:

(1) If you choose File -> Save As you get a dialog that will give you a choice of formats. If you choose jpg and hit OK, then Photoshop wants the save the jpg with pixel dimensions as set in Photoshop. You can change that with Image -> Image Size before you save it. In the Image Size dialog the dimensions are presented but are linked. You can unlink them by clicking on the chain on the link. If you do that you will change the aspect ratio so your image will be distorted.

(2) if you choose File -> Export -> Export As then you get a dialog that allows you to choose the pixel dimensions and also the output file format (png, jpg, gif, svg).

Reply
Jan 1, 2021 11:55:35   #
Hunter Lou 1947 Loc: Minnesota
 
Thanks, that seems to make a little sense.

Reply
 
 
Jan 1, 2021 13:34:01   #
pecohen Loc: Central Maine
 
I started a new topic that is related to this one. It probably is of no interested to readers who are committed to JPEG, but others may want to take a look.

Reply
Jan 1, 2021 14:43:08   #
WCS
 
Thank you for all your comments. I have the luxury of shooting in both [double card bay; jpeg + RAW] at the same time but haven't spent any time processing RAW images. This is inspirational!
Thank you and Happy New Year!

Reply
Jan 1, 2021 18:45:26   #
mjmoly
 
Morning Star makes an excellent point that resonates with me. I shoot to have the maximum information available. I continue to learn the possibilities of post processing. I stick to LR. There’s more there than I will ever learn to use. But a am able to produce nice images that give me both pleasure and satisfaction. And I have developed a very easy protocol for exporting JPEGs that meet my needs. This works for me.

Happy New Year. May you all find the system that works for you!

Reply
Jan 1, 2021 19:17:54   #
pecohen Loc: Central Maine
 
Shoot raw just in case some time in the future you need that extra detail. I keep sensing this concept in reading comments here and it gives me some amusement. I have a lot of old images and I keep promising myself that some day🤞 I'll go back and re-process them with the much more powerful and better skills I now have. Well, maybe.

I'm now in the second half of my seventh decade here and I still imagine there is plenty of time for this some day to come around. Realistically, I suspect that if you don't take advantage of the RAW images you shoot today at least in the next month or two then in most cases you probably never will.

Reply
 
 
Jan 1, 2021 20:39:06   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
rb99 wrote:
Funny - no one thinks there are any disadvantages to shooting in RAW? For casual shooting the massive file size - 10X over jpeg and the fact you MUST process every shot before it is useable seem to be significant disadvantages.


Two points:

> Raw file size was an issue in the early 2000s. We had slow networks and servers, limited Internet bandwidth, slow computers, and very expensive storage. In 2020, it’s trivial on new equipment.

> Decent raw editor apps let you copy settings from one adjusted file and paste them to hundreds. That can get you closer to perfection a lot faster, especially when the lighting and exposure were fixed.

Reply
Jan 1, 2021 20:59:53   #
mjmoly
 
Burkphoto--Agreed. It's just not a problem for me. And it keeps my aspirations alive that I will come back and work on the photos I've already taken.

Thanks for the points.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.