Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Back Pack
Page <prev 2 of 2
Dec 31, 2020 08:14:01   #
BurghByrd Loc: Pittsburgh
 
Shimoda and F-stop also offer Photography backbacks with good features worth considering.

Reply
Dec 31, 2020 08:25:27   #
starlifter Loc: Towson, MD
 
Thanks for all your reply's. I 've a lot of research material now.

Reply
Dec 31, 2020 09:32:31   #
Real Nikon Lover Loc: Simi Valley, CA
 
johngault007 wrote:
I just recently upgraded to a Lowepro Protactic 450 II and it holds more than what I probably need. The downside is that it gets heavy very fast, but that's just another reason for me to maintain a steady workout program :)


Amen. I have same and it is rugged, almost too rugged. Stiff to open with the plastic protective shell. But a tank!

Reply
 
 
Dec 31, 2020 10:06:00   #
PurpleHaze204 Loc: North Potomac, MD
 
I really like the Mindshift 26L. Holds all my equipment (two cameras, 3 lenses, etc)

Reply
Dec 31, 2020 11:01:23   #
photoman43
 
Check out the ThinkTank backpacks and those made by GuraGear. Their Kiboko bags are very well made and come in three different sizes. I use Kiboko bags the mot when I need a backpack style camera bag.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1435530-REG/gura_gear_gg0522_1945_kiboko_2_0_22l_backpack.html

Reply
Dec 31, 2020 12:05:55   #
SteveLew Loc: Sugar Land, TX
 
You may want to look at F-Stop backpacks. These F-Stop packs are light and well made. I have had the AJNA bag (37ltr) for some time and I shoot landscape and usually hike to my destination.

Reply
Dec 31, 2020 12:15:09   #
rjandreoff Loc: Hawaii
 
I use a Lowepro AW500 for my D4 attached to a Nikon 400 2.8 AFS G VR, plus other gear. Works great, fits travel size rules for most airlines, fits nicely. $150-200.

Reply
 
 
Dec 31, 2020 12:43:21   #
Hip Coyote
 
bleirer wrote:
If it doesn't fit in here it doesn't make the trip. The Velcro inner dividers are adjustable to any configuration. https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Deluxe-Backpack-Cameras-Accent/dp/B00009R6TA


I like that bag and use it for my M43 stuff. Wish it were a bit less flimsy for added protection. But it wont hold what the OP is carrying. That's some serious kit he's got going on.

Reply
Dec 31, 2020 17:38:48   #
Drbobcameraguy Loc: Eaton Ohio
 
starlifter wrote:
Does any one know of a good sized back pack that would be able to hold the following: a sigma 150-600 and the trinty of 2.8 lens's. I tried a Esddi from Amazon and it's too small,or am I dreaming.


I have the large Ruggard and love it.

Reply
Dec 31, 2020 17:51:09   #
crphoto8 Loc: Anaheim, California
 
starlifter wrote:
Does any one know of a good sized back pack that would be able to hold the following: a sigma 150-600 and the trinty of 2.8 lens's. I tried a Esddi from Amazon and it's too small,or am I dreaming.


Check out the ThinkTank Photo Security/Airport.

Reply
Dec 31, 2020 17:53:51   #
cbtsam Loc: Monkton, MD
 
My solution was to buy a ROTATION180° PROFESSIONAL PHOTO INSERT from thinktank, and then I went to my favorite backpack store - REI - and pretty quickly zeroed in on a Gregory Baltoro. My goal was to carry gear while backpacking, and the Gregory is just about perfect. It features a panel opening, so it's easy to get to my photo gear, and it has enough space to include other gear for camping etc. Gregory makes smaller packs if all you want to carry is the camera, lenses, etc. The important point is that the Gregory pack wears so easily; I can carry 150% in the Gregory compared with say my Kelty.

Reply
 
 
Jan 1, 2021 00:43:00   #
guyweech Loc: southern Idaho
 
Gura Gear works with their big pack but bewarned unless your a pack mule it will be very heavy that's the equipment i have in mine and I have a hard time packing it to the car!

Reply
Jan 1, 2021 20:42:47   #
Angel Star Photography Loc: Tacoma, WA
 
starlifter wrote:
Does any one know of a good sized back pack that would be able to hold the following: a sigma 150-600 and the trinty of 2.8 lens's. I tried a Esddi from Amazon and it's too small,or am I dreaming.


I use a Manfrotto Pro Lite Bumblebee 230. It packs a lot and very durable. At one time, I carried a Sigma 150-600, a Canon 24-105 f/4L, a 70-200 f2.8L, 5DIV, two flashes (600EX-RT II and 470EX AI), battery packs filled with AA batteries, and a 17-inch laptop. Needless to say it was heavy but still comfortable due to the strap construction, lumbar support, and airflow design of the backing providing cooling on the back.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1334233-REG/manfrotto_mb_pl_b_230_pro_light_bumblebee_230_camera.html

A couple of videos I watched in the course of my research to find the best fit for me are below:

Durability Field Test
https://youtu.be/RPK4CbKTWJs

Pack Capacity Capability (jump to 7:03 to bypass all the general information and see him unpack the bag)
https://youtu.be/klyQyxQl0tE

Sincerely,

Charles

Edit: I neglected to mention that over time I reduced the equipment I carried to just the essentials based upon the adventure I was pursuing. However, that space was then taken up by such things as a change of clothes, a pocket rocket gas stove, a mess kit, and food. The laptop was replaced with a Camelbak 3-liter bladder from my cycling backpack.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.