Low cost camera with sharp long distance zoom (Page 5): To MJG: Buy it! The SX50 camera is a bargain for $200.00 and will probably get as close to doing what you are looking for as any...

Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum

Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰

Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.

Main Photography Discussion

Low cost camera with sharp long distance zoom

Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>

Nov 9, 2020 01:01:52 #

jdub82 Loc: Northern California

Ward wrote:

Have a Canon SX50 I will sell for the $200

To MJG: Buy it! The SX50 camera is a bargain for $200.00 and will probably get as close to doing what you are looking for as any super zoom available. I have an SX50 and love it. I took it on a Safari in Kenya and got some great long distance shots with the 50X zoom.

Nov 9, 2020 06:04:51 #

PhotoshooterNJ Loc: NJ

MJG wrote:

Thanks, Gene. I’m afraid you may be right. Just not possible. This seemed my best possibility but it still probably won’t catch the eagles and pelicans sitting out there:
Panasonic LUMIX FZ80 4K Digital Camera, 18.1 Megapixel Video Camera, 60X Zoom DC VARIO 20-1200mm Lens, F2.8-5.9 Aperture, Power O.I.S. Stabilization, Touch Enabled 3-Inch LCD, Wi-Fi, DC-FZ80K (Black)

You can get a used canoe for $200 and then you can go to the Island with your iPhone! 🤪

Nov 9, 2020 08:03:26 #

pecohen Loc: Central Maine

MJG wrote:

From my window I can see a small island in the bay. I bought the Phone Scope which is supposed to attach my iPhone Pro Max to my telescope - too unsteady. So I’m looking for a camera that will zoom in on the island and take sharp photos of the wildlife which is not visible without a strong telescope.
Any suggestions for a low cost camera for taking sharp distant images?

I generally use a Sony A6500 which is way outside of your budget, but I recently picked up a used Lomix (Panasonic) ZS40 for a mere $65; I wanted a camera that would fit easily in my pocket. For the price it is amazing - not as good as my Sony but it really takes pretty good pictures. Here is a slide show made up from pictures I took with it: https://www.facebook.com/100017673032001/videos/689529544979474.

Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.

Nov 9, 2020 09:22:14 #

Eric Bornstein Loc: Toronto Canada

I don’t typically add a critical comment to a post. However, I believe that MJG has got to be pulling out ‘proverbial’ leg. $200 set aside for a camera and a long telephoto lens; in your dreams!

Nov 9, 2020 09:48:45 #

aellman Loc: Boston MA

MJG wrote:

Maybe $200.

Used bridge cameras are plentiful on ebay. They fit your budget and will give you the long zoom you want.

Nov 9, 2020 10:04:41 #

wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado

MJG wrote:

I think Gene51 is correct. A true telescope may help better than a lens, but neither will be cheap or possibly as successful as you want. Maybe rent a lens and see what results you get.

Nov 9, 2020 13:20:52 #

radiojohn

Any lens that powerful will need a very study support. There are also atmospherics to consider.

Check out Travel Photography - Tips and More section of our forum.

Nov 9, 2020 14:13:30 #

maciej

How about an adapter to attach your camera to the telescope? Then get an inexpensive SLR. A variety of good ones are available at quite reasonable prices used.

Nov 9, 2020 15:22:31 #

tropics68 Loc: Georgia

Gene51 wrote:

A long zoom won't get you what you want. Most of the image degradation is due to atmospheric conditions - haze, mist, fog, heat shimmer, etc. You could spend $20,000 on a lens and full frame camera and not be at all satisfied. Good luck with your quest . . .

Oh So True

Nov 9, 2020 16:38:21 #

jimmol

MJG wrote:

Don't worry about atmospheric degradation-- if you can see it clearly with a telescope, a camera with the right lens can see it too. The FZ80 would be a good choice if you can get one second hand (try Ebay). I have the FZ300 and it works very well for distant birds. Both of these cameras can double the effective focal length in computing the JPEG version. I use this feature all the time; degradation of the image is negligible.

Nov 9, 2020 16:48:46 #

Mu Dan

How about a kayak? It could really be fun.

Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.

Nov 9, 2020 18:11:02 #

deputydawg265101 Loc: Montana

Is your telescope on a tripo? My husband used one with his iPhone on a telescope adapter that holds it more steady and a beanbag weight on the tripod to help stability.

Nov 9, 2020 18:56:25 #

aellman Loc: Boston MA

wdross wrote:

I think Gene51 is correct. A true telescope may help better than a lens, but neither will be cheap or possibly as successful as you want. Maybe rent a lens and see what results you get.

Yeah, you can attach the telescope to the camera body with duct tape. Works like a charm.

Nov 9, 2020 22:04:48 #

fstoprookie Loc: Central Valley of California

I have a nice D7100 for sale with 2 lens (28-55 &70-300 mm), 3 batterys , a charger, a bag, and the Nikon Owners manual if your interested

Nov 9, 2020 23:14:50 #

wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado

aellman wrote:

Yeah, you can attach the telescope to the camera body with duct tape. Works like a charm.

You just buy an adapter, silly. Did that back in the film days. I just haven't had it as a high enough priority on my digital list. I want to buy a much better telescope first to replace the one I gave to my son and granddaughter.

Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>

If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.

Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.

Main Photography Discussion

Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections

UglyHedgehog.com - Forum