Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
Opinions Desired
Page 1 of 2 next>
Oct 24, 2020 19:00:19   #
DRam11 Loc: Polson, MT
 
The following pictures of a doe and her second year fawn were were around 100 yards across the road from our home. A 300mm lens was used, but the image still took a fairly large amount of cropping. Around 9:00 AM, low clouds, new snow. I have difficulty exposing for snow scenes, and that shows here. It took quite a bit of fiddling in ON1 to get this image acceptable.

There are two sized images - one that is 2048p on the long side and the other 1920p on the long side.

in your opinion which makes for a better composition? Any other comments are welcome.

ISO 1000. Shutter 1/1000. Aperture 6.3, ExpComp 0


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Oct 24, 2020 19:05:48   #
PixelStan77 Loc: Vermont/Chicago
 
DRam11 wrote:
The following pictures of a doe and her second year fawn were were around 100 yards across the road from our home. A 300mm lens was used, but the image still took a fairly large amount of cropping. Around 9:00 AM, low clouds, new snow. I have difficulty exposing for snow scenes, and that shows here. It took quite a bit of fiddling in ON1 to get this image acceptable.

There are two sized images - one that is 2048p on the long side and the other 1920p on the long side.

in your opinion which makes for a better composition? Any other comments are welcome.

ISO 1000. Shutter 1/1000. Aperture 6.3, ExpComp 0
The following pictures of a doe and her second yea... (show quote)


I would go with the second image because it is a better composition to focus on the doe and fawn.

Reply
Oct 24, 2020 19:21:37   #
OutBack Loc: North Central Florida
 
I would try a neutral density filter begun with negative numbers for starting at the bottom and trying out 50, 60 , 70% up or more. I think that is a standard in PS4 up

Reply
 
 
Oct 24, 2020 19:45:59   #
PoppieJ Loc: North Georgia
 
I think that the second crop is the better composition

Reply
Oct 24, 2020 19:48:33   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
PixelStan77 wrote:
I would go with the second image because it is a better composition to focus on the doe and fawn.


Reply
Oct 24, 2020 21:08:28   #
rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA
 
DRam11 wrote:
The following pictures of a doe and her second year fawn were were around 100 yards across the road from our home. A 300mm lens was used, but the image still took a fairly large amount of cropping. Around 9:00 AM, low clouds, new snow. I have difficulty exposing for snow scenes, and that shows here. It took quite a bit of fiddling in ON1 to get this image acceptable.

There are two sized images - one that is 2048p on the long side and the other 1920p on the long side.

in your opinion which makes for a better composition? Any other comments are welcome.

ISO 1000. Shutter 1/1000. Aperture 6.3, ExpComp 0
The following pictures of a doe and her second yea... (show quote)


Does ON1 have an eyedropper tool identical to Lightroom's White Balance panel? IN LR, it's easy to color correct snow with the dropper.

Reply
Oct 25, 2020 08:01:19   #
tuthdoc
 
Composition is great but calm the snow down👍👍

Reply
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Oct 25, 2020 08:24:43   #
raymondh Loc: Walker, MI
 
#2.

Reply
Oct 25, 2020 08:46:00   #
kvanhook Loc: Oriental, NC
 
Number two is better with focus on the main subject.

Reply
Oct 25, 2020 09:12:51   #
tcthome Loc: NJ
 
In these photos the foreground snow looks a little toward the neutral gray.(my monitor is calibrated) I seen a vid once & believe it was made by Adorama & Bryan Peterson. He boosted up the exposure compensation some to get white snow if I remember correctly. You might want to try this on the snow if it is still around. The same would be with a Snowy Egret. Your camera always tries for 18% grey unless told other.

Nice deer pics.

Reply
Oct 25, 2020 10:26:15   #
StanMac Loc: Tennessee
 
The second image is better IMO. You might consider cloning out that grass strand that extends over the deers’ faces.

Stan

Reply
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Oct 25, 2020 12:04:52   #
crafterwantabe Loc: Mn
 
Nice deer shots...

Reply
Oct 25, 2020 13:19:25   #
DRam11 Loc: Polson, MT
 
PixelStan77 wrote:
I would go with the second image because it is a better composition to focus on the doe and fawn.


Originally that was my opinion, but on my laptop somehow the first looks better. Perhaps because the additional enlargement with the second exacerbates what appears to be noise, or maybe soft focus. I'll have to work with it some more and see what can be done.

Thanks for your opinion.

Reply
Oct 25, 2020 13:31:36   #
Curmudgeon Loc: SE Arizona
 
I like the first one the noise can be handled I think. Just a question: Why did you choose an ISO of 1,000 and a shutter speed of 1,000? That ISO guarantees more noise .

Reply
Oct 25, 2020 13:42:18   #
DRam11 Loc: Polson, MT
 
tcthome wrote:
In these photos the foreground snow looks a little toward the neutral gray.(my monitor is calibrated) I seen a vid once & believe it was made by Adorama & Bryan Peterson. He boosted up the exposure compensation some to get white snow if I remember correctly. You might want to try this on the snow if it is still around. The same would be with a Snowy Egret. Your camera always tries for 18% grey unless told other.

Nice deer pics.


Outback also suggested a means of whitening the snow, something I hadn't considered. This is an image that took quite a bit of work to get a presentable picture, here's the out-of-camera image:


(Download)

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.