Canon can't read jpgs
Oct 15, 2020 10:04:54 #
harolnick wrote:
You are correct. And they are. But I'm so accustomed to my camera, that I just don't use the phone that much. If I can't get these pix on, I'll use the phone more.
The cellphone will be far superior for displaying photos than the camera.
Oct 15, 2020 11:32:31 #
Picture Taker
Loc: Michigan Thumb
I have a question for you. Why do you keep pictures on your card? I and every one else I know downloads the picture to a drive on or off your computer and put the card back in the camera and formats to be clean.
PS We also double back it up.
PS We also double back it up.
Oct 15, 2020 12:16:39 #
hcmcdole wrote:
I believe you have to 1) put the images back in th... (show quote)
đź‘Ťđź‘Ť Absolutely. Just recreate the exact file/path/folder structure and naming convention that the camera uses.
Oct 15, 2020 12:18:15 #
Picture Taker wrote:
I have a question for you. Why do you keep pictures on your card? I and every one else I know downloads the picture to a drive on or off your computer and put the card back in the camera and formats to be clean.
PS We also double back it up.
PS We also double back it up.
Because he wants his top 80 to show people. The concept is just fine but that's what a cell phone is best at. I addition, it's lot easier to view then a review screen on a camera and some klutz doesn't drop it.
Oct 15, 2020 13:17:38 #
Picture Taker
Loc: Michigan Thumb
I guess I just never think of my camera as a place to show my pictures, I do if we have several of us shooting together, but that might my last shot or so. When I show them it when I have them in print for 13X19 or 24X36 or 30X40 on canvas, but we all do our thing and that is photography.
Oct 15, 2020 13:37:01 #
harolnick wrote:
Around 80 jpgs were on the Sundisk memory card of ... (show quote)
Looking at photos on other people’s cameras has got to be one of the least user friendly ways of sharing. You have to hand your camera to someone who may not know how to use it and the screen is small. People will give your pictures a token glance at best. Find another way to share and forget the camera.
...Cam
Oct 15, 2020 13:45:44 #
CamB wrote:
Looking at photos on other people’s cameras has got to be one of the least user friendly ways of sharing. You have to hand your camera to someone who may not know how to use it and the screen is small. People will give your pictures a token glance at best. Find another way to share and forget the camera.
...Cam
...Cam
Get a tablet!
Oct 15, 2020 14:06:00 #
Join the 21st Century! Put them onto a cloud drive (iCloud, Dropbox or what ever) and share them via your phone. Sharing them on a camera screen makes no sense. The screen is small, lacks resolution, is not portable etc. Messing around with algorithmic solutions may be a nice hobby, but your phone screen will better display better on your phone (or tablet.) Audrey Hepburn deserves more than a small screen with poor resolution!
Oct 15, 2020 14:08:22 #
An interesting idea - put some keepers in your camera for showing. Personally, I have a very large number on a website (Smugmug) and show from my phone.
Oct 15, 2020 14:09:31 #
RWebb76 wrote:
Join the 21st Century! Put them onto a cloud drive (iCloud, Dropbox or what ever) and share them via your phone. Sharing them on a camera screen makes no sense. The screen is small, lacks resolution, is not portable etc. Messing around with algorithmic solutions may be a nice hobby, but your phone screen will better display better on your phone (or tablet.) Audrey Hepburn deserves more than a small screen with poor resolution!
That might be a little too 22nd Century .... I wouldn't want to be 100% dependent on a 21st Century mobile service signal to display images in the cloud, when I have several GBs available on the internal or memory card in my phone to hold these images for these display situations.
Oct 15, 2020 14:29:55 #
PHRubin wrote:
An interesting idea - put some keepers in your camera for showing. Personally, I have a very large number on a website (Smugmug) and show from my phone.
I'd never lug my camera around to show people, or show people while I'm shooting. I use the gallery in my phone for showing, but rarely.
If I want to share with people not right next to me, I use my website or Facebook. That way they can look, or not, at their leisure.
Oct 15, 2020 16:10:42 #
Kozan
Loc: Trenton Tennessee
harolnick wrote:
Around 80 jpgs were on the Sundisk memory card of ... (show quote)
Why would you want to copy files back to the camera? That makes no sense to me.
Oct 15, 2020 16:31:09 #
hmmmmm. I suspect that is you record "raw" as well as jpgs, the problem will go away...might want to try it.... interesting tho.. Ed
Oct 15, 2020 17:04:11 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
That might be a little too 22nd Century .... I wouldn't want to be 100% dependent on a 21st Century mobile service signal to display images in the cloud, when I have several GBs available on the internal or memory card in my phone to hold these images for these display situations.
I keep copies on my desk top, a back up drive and one in the cloud. And if it is special I print it. And if I want something immediately on my phone, I keep it resident. I guess my point was why drag around a camera? It would be like dragging around a television and dvd player to watch a movie when there is better tech out there.
Anyhoo, I follow your comments on this forum and have learned a lot.
Rick
Oct 15, 2020 19:38:57 #
Hawkowl
Loc: Ithaca, NY
BebuLamar wrote:
What do you do in the wilderness? You switched SD cards when you want to show picture vs when you want to take pictures?
What happens in the wilderness stays in the wilderness.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.