Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Just thinking out loud
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
Oct 10, 2012 12:23:40   #
Bruce with a Canon Loc: Islip
 
seems to me that would be like asking what kind of gun was used by examining the exit wound.
Tyring to acertain what brand car left that smokey burnout by the tread marks

Reply
Oct 10, 2012 13:52:00   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Robbie7 wrote:
If the top ten prosumer DSLRs each took the same photo under identifiable conditions and the resulting photographs were produced under the same conditions. How many of us could state which photo belonged to which camera. I think it would be fun to see the results.

It's one thing to say which photo was taken by which camera. As someone above said, cameras have characterists that an expert might be able to distinguish.

The big question is, would one brand or level of camera take noticably better quality pictures, so that anyone could appreciate the difference? I would have to say no to that.

Send a dozen people out with a dozen different cameras, and you would get a wide range of quality in their photographs, regardless what cameras they were using.

Reply
Oct 10, 2012 14:43:00   #
arjty
 
That's all right, What are those stores? UK?

Reply
 
 
Oct 10, 2012 14:46:00   #
arjty
 
That's all right, What are those stores? UK?

Reply
Oct 10, 2012 14:47:44   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Bruce with a Canon wrote:
Tyring to acertain what brand car left that smokey burnout by the tread marks

Reminds me of "My Cousin Vinny." That's just what they did in that very funny movie.

Reply
Oct 10, 2012 15:15:03   #
chascar Loc: From Texas curently living in Oklahoma
 
I subscribe to the old saying, "The best camera is the one you have with you".

Reply
Oct 10, 2012 16:05:49   #
DavidT Loc: Maryland
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Bruce with a Canon wrote:
Tyring to acertain what brand car left that smokey burnout by the tread marks

Reminds me of "My Cousin Vinny." That's just what they did in that very funny movie.


a 1963 metallic mint-green Pontiac Tempest...very funny. The movie, not the car.

Reply
 
 
Oct 10, 2012 16:26:10   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
DavidT wrote:
jerryc41 wrote:
Bruce with a Canon wrote:
Tyring to acertain what brand car left that smokey burnout by the tread marks

Reminds me of "My Cousin Vinny." That's just what they did in that very funny movie.


a 1963 metallic mint-green Pontiac Tempest...very funny. The movie, not the car.

Right!

Reply
Oct 10, 2012 17:36:24   #
rts2568
 
Robbie7 wrote:
If the top ten prosumer DSLRs each took the same photo under identifiable conditions and the resulting photographs were produced under the same conditions. How many of us could state which photo belonged to which camera. I think it would be fun to see the results.


To Robbie?
From rts2568

Well done Robbie? great idea, but don't just put the idea, its your idea so go do it and let us see the results.


rts2568

Reply
Oct 10, 2012 17:55:57   #
Bruce with a Canon Loc: Islip
 
DavidT wrote:
jerryc41 wrote:
Bruce with a Canon wrote:
Tyring to acertain what brand car left that smokey burnout by the tread marks

Reminds me of "My Cousin Vinny." That's just what they did in that very funny movie.


a 1963 metallic mint-green Pontiac Tempest...very funny. The movie, not the car.


nice enough but a 65 SS283 Chevy II would do it for me
4 speed, 350 gears please!

Reply
Oct 10, 2012 18:07:12   #
Beercan31 Loc: Lost & Found
 
I don't want to "High Jack" this post......... BUT??????

@ Lighthouse

lighthouse wrote:

Certain sensors have certain properties that can become evident. eg Canons crosshatch noise


can you please show by example of what crosshatch noise is plse

Thank You

Reply
 
 
Oct 10, 2012 18:20:32   #
chuckyoung Loc: Boulder City, NV
 
I had to laugh when I saw your post... I shot an F3 back in the film days. When I decided to go digital, I couldn't make up my mind, here I had all (3 or4) Nikon lens but when I found out they wouldn't fit the new digital cameras...

My local Dealer (Casey Cameras) let me borrow a new Nikon (don't remember which model) with 50mm, I shot a few stills and he printed them for me, I didn't own a good color printer... I returned the Nikon and borrowed a 20D, with a 50mm lens, I went out and shot the exact subjects one more time, and had him print them again on the same printer.

For several days, I ask everyone I knew... " which is better, A or B"?

For all intents & purposes there was no difference in shots.

The difference in price tho, was several hundred dollars, maybe as much as 500, I don't remember... I went with the Canon and have never looked back.

Good question though

Reply
Oct 10, 2012 18:37:45   #
rts2568
 
chuckyoung wrote:
I had to laugh when I saw your post... I shot an F3 back in the film days. When I decided to go digital, I couldn't make up my mind, here I had all (3 or4) Nikon lens but when I found out they wouldn't fit the new digital cameras...

My local Dealer (Casey Cameras) let me borrow a new Nikon (don't remember which model) with 50mm, I shot a few stills and he printed them for me, I didn't own a good color printer... I returned the Nikon and borrowed a 20D, with a 50mm lens, I went out and shot the exact subjects one more time, and had him print them again on the same printer.

For several days, I ask everyone I knew... " which is better, A or B"?

For all intents & purposes there was no difference in shots.

The difference in price tho, was several hundred dollars, maybe as much as 500, I don't remember... I went with the Canon and have never looked back.

Good question though
I had to laugh when I saw your post... I shot an F... (show quote)



To chuckyoung
From rts2568

Pity you didn't stick with Nikon because you could have kept on using those Nikkor lenses you had, unless they were 50 to sixty years old and needed to ba adapted. They do fit the latest Nikon bodies; now I shoot film and digital with the same lenses.

Oh well, can't turn the clock back - they haven't invented time travel yet but who knows, next year perhaps.

rts2568

Reply
Oct 10, 2012 19:27:55   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
Beercan31 wrote:
I don't want to "High Jack" this post......... BUT??????

@ Lighthouse

lighthouse wrote:

Certain sensors have certain properties that can become evident. eg Canons crosshatch noise


can you please show by example of what crosshatch noise is plse


Thank You
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/32848037

I have seen it on my 5D2, my mates 5D2 and also evidence of it on 7D images posted online.

Reply
Oct 10, 2012 20:29:45   #
rts2568
 
lighthouse wrote:
Beercan31 wrote:
I don't want to "High Jack" this post......... BUT??????

@ Lighthouse

lighthouse wrote:

Certain sensors have certain properties that can become evident. eg Canons crosshatch noise


can you please show by example of what crosshatch noise is plse


Thank You
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/32848037

I have seen it on my 5D2, my mates 5D2 and also evidence of it on 7D images posted online.



To Lighthouse,
From rts2568

Nasty lines, photo destroyers!

Have you tried post processing a RAW file from your Canon gear, not a low resolution JPG.

The only time you save the JPG is when you have finished all post processing manipulations and are keeping the low res' for posting out etc, never to be "SAVED" again.

Compare and see if the bands are still evident?

rts2568

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.