That's where the old depth of field scale on lenses was so handy, you could determine what would be in focus.
polyman wrote:
That's where the old depth of field scale on lenses was so handy, you could determine what would be in focus.
Not really. They only show the DoF.
The distance scale and witness mark show what will be in focus.
cjc2
Loc: Hellertown PA
To each his/her own! I own a bunch of F1.4 lenses, a few F1.8, a couple F2s, a slew of F2.8 and a couple of F4s. None of my lenses are variable aperture. I have specific situations for specific lenses. As a sports shooter I use my 400/2.8 heavily and in many cases nothing else will do for the images I need to produce for my clients, not even a 200-400/4 which I also own. When I move to indoor sports, I break out the faster primes. My 105/1.4 is my go-to for headshots and portraits. It's about bokeh, but it is also about focusing speed. I shoot all-the-way down to F16 upon occasion, and sometimes I follow the old rule "F8 and be there". What guides me, and my work, is choosing the right lens for the job. My older 20/2.8D is light and my 200/2 is NOT! YMMV. Best of luck.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.