Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Photographing birds using a heavy lens
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Sep 5, 2020 15:20:13   #
jim quist Loc: Missouri
 
My 500 f4.



Reply
Sep 5, 2020 15:50:14   #
PixelStan77 Loc: Vermont/Chicago
 
jim quist wrote:
My 500 f4.


Great Foot Pod

Reply
Sep 5, 2020 16:08:32   #
Curmudgeon Loc: SE Arizona
 
Wow a quadrapod supporting an unshod biped

Reply
 
 
Sep 5, 2020 20:44:46   #
fatbratcat Loc: Cuyahoga Falls, OH
 
A chair, Just what I need for photography w/o pain!

Reply
Sep 6, 2020 06:04:09   #
djlouden Loc: Ocala, Florida
 
My 500 doesn't get out as much these days. The older I get the heavier my gear gets. Must be something in the Florida water.

Thanks for sharing your solution.

Happy shooting

Reply
Sep 6, 2020 06:08:06   #
Peterfiore Loc: Where DR goes south
 
Is that an original issued kneen or one of the Bionic models, that usually comes later in life....

Reply
Sep 6, 2020 06:09:43   #
Deanie1113
 
I have the same issue! Though your solution may work for you, I feel that I must caution you -- the position you are in is very bad for your back. It's probably fine in a pinch, but I wouldn't stay in that position very long or do it every day. Some of us have traded in our big gear for a mirrorless, lightweight option.

Reply
 
 
Sep 6, 2020 06:30:06   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
Personally, I do not Kneed a big lens, I have a compact superzoom. With some effort, I can finger out how to do birding with it.

Reply
Sep 6, 2020 07:44:05   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
jim quist wrote:
My 500 f4.


There ARE better ways..........yes, it can and does "work"

Reply
Sep 6, 2020 07:48:08   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
jim quist wrote:
My 500 f4.


NOT on my "best practices" list.

Reply
Sep 6, 2020 08:01:24   #
ecobin Loc: Paoli, PA
 
👍

Reply
 
 
Sep 6, 2020 08:16:18   #
bikerguy
 
This picture is the reason I switched from Canon to Olympus and saved pounds in my photo kit. The omd em1 m2 and the 300 mm (600mm equivalent) probably weighs less that the lens alone.

Reply
Sep 6, 2020 08:33:23   #
mizzee Loc: Boston,Ma
 
bikerguy wrote:
This picture is the reason I switched from Canon to Olympus and saved pounds in my photo kit. The omd em1 m2 and the 300 mm (600mm equivalent) probably weighs less that the lens alone.


Ditto!

Reply
Sep 6, 2020 08:34:28   #
Notorious T.O.D. Loc: Harrisburg, North Carolina
 
Is that chair rated for that heavy of camera and lens...😳😎😎

Reply
Sep 6, 2020 09:44:46   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
bikerguy wrote:
This picture is the reason I switched from Canon to Olympus and saved pounds in my photo kit. The omd em1 m2 and the 300 mm (600mm equivalent) probably weighs less that the lens alone.


You are correct in weight. But for me, a full frame 600 4 is much better than a 600 on a 4/3 sensor. You do save on weight but the sacrifice on sensor size which is it too much for me. Yes, there is a big difference. See chart below.
https://blog.henrys.com/wp-content/uploads/camera-sensor-comparison-chart.jpg

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.