Reports that it constantly jams
hwink29 wrote:
Reports that it constantly jams
Please use the quote reply.
I'm assuming you're responding to my post.
The slide feeder had to be baby-sat even with the newer adjustable gate model.
Wasn't trusted to click "go" and leave.
I got conditioned to listen for a jam in progress.
But the scans were clean.
Checkout ScanScience on Fluid scanning with a Epson V750 and other type scanners for high res scans ..
Nikon scanners may be old, but they work. A few years ago I bought a Nikon 4000 (I think that's the model) on Ebay and when I was done I sold it there at a profit. Try to get one with an auto feeder. Nikon's auto feeder jams a lot, but it's better than hand feeding.
Some observations: Kodachrome slides last very well for decades; other films not so much.
Lots of slides were not as sharp or well-exposed as I remembered.
Dust embeds itself in the emulsion and can't be blown off. My solution was a dust and scratch remover Photoshop plug-in from Polaroid.
Faded slides were often much improved by a Kodak plug-in called ROC. This may stand for Restoral of Color.
Good luck,
Jim
jimmol wrote:
Nikon scanners may be old, but they work. A few years ago I bought a Nikon 4000 (I think that's the model) on Ebay and when I was done I sold it there at a profit. Try to get one with an auto feeder. Nikon's auto feeder jams a lot, but it's better than hand feeding.
Some observations: Kodachrome slides last very well for decades; other films not so much.
Lots of slides were not as sharp or well-exposed as I remembered.
Dust embeds itself in the emulsion and can't be blown off. My solution was a dust and scratch remover Photoshop plug-in from Polaroid.
Faded slides were often much improved by a Kodak plug-in called ROC. This may stand for Restoral of Color.
Good luck,
Jim
Nikon scanners may be old, but they work. A few y... (
show quote)
FWIW, Ken Rockwell Reviews the Polaroid dust and scratch filter.
https://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/photoshop/polaroid-dust-filter.htmIs this is?
DirtFarmer
Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
hwink29 wrote:
I know this topic has been discussed before but not recently. I have years of slides to digitize. I want a higher end scanner under $3,000. I really do not see myself photographing slides.
Nikon scanners are old. Flatbed scanners seem to get only fair ratings.
Would appreciate your thoughts for a relatively new version of slide scanner
If I were going to drop a bundle on a scanner to digitize my slides, it would do things other than just digitize slides. I used my camera about 15 years ago to digitize about 1000 slides. Got a slide copier and added some stuff to make the light less variable. It was manual and took me a while, but when I was done the camera was useful for other things.
I have a flatbed scanner and it doesn't do slides well at all. The camera was a much better option. I would always avoid any scanner that has a slot into which you insert the item to be scanned. If it jams, you chew up your original, and it won't work at all with stiff items or thick items.
Years of slides could be anything from 100 to 100000. But that range is still finite. Eventually you will finish scanning your slides. What will you do with your expensive scanner when you're done? It has been suggested that you sell it. A possibility, but usually you take a discounted return when you do that. Better to have something more flexible that you can apply to other purposes when your slide project is done.
JimRPhoto wrote:
I spent a number of weeks scanning a few hundred old slides. It became obvious that although (many) certain slides are clearly in focus on a light box using a loupe, they are not in focus with a dedicated slide scanner. Also, if a slide is very dark, in other words, badly underexposed, there is not much to be done to rescue it from a scan, even with photoshop. Then I read on this forum about photographing slides. I bought a Nikon ES-2 at my local camera store for under $100, a step down ring to mate it to my lens size, and used several “close up filters” which are not filters at all, but screw in macro adapters. I can fill the frame with the slide (proportions slightly off, not much). I adjust exposure in camera for the badly underexposed slides, and they turn out far better than I ever thought possible. And everything is in focus. So for under $200, IF you have a lens that will work for this, you can be in business. And instead of scanning 4 slides every 10 minutes, I can shoot probably 10 or more slides in 10 minutes with much better result. Tip, the first step is to see how close your lenses will focus (approximate) before you decide to go this way. If you want to know my combo, I am happy to share. JimR.
I spent a number of weeks scanning a few hundred o... (
show quote)
I keep seeing Nikon solutions but not Canon. Can anyone give me a setup equivalent to the Nikon above?
I have had an Epson V550 for six years and am very happy with it. It does slides, 35mm negatives and photos. Problem is, if you buy it at Amazon, the price has skyrocketed from the price I paid, $149.99, to $693.92. Amazon appears to no longer have the best deal in town. I recently had to replace my Canon printer and found out they're like toilet paper was three months ago. I scoured the local stores for two weeks, and nobody had the printer I wanted. But Amazon had it for about $50 more than the local asking prices. I finally broke down and bought it from Amazon. Bottom line, whatever you decide to buy, you might want to shop around.
Ednsb wrote:
I keep seeing Nikon solutions but not Canon. Can anyone give me a setup equivalent to the Nikon above?
Nikon got out of the scanner business a decade or more ago. There still are some Nikon Coolscan scanners available on Ebay, etc., but Nikon no longer supports them.
The newly released Plustek Opticfilm 120 Pro probably most closely matches the capabilities of the older Nikon scanners. It's a high resolution scanner, offers batch scanning, and can do 35mm slide and filmstrips and 120 format film.
the link to download is no longer working. I think this might be a dead product
Ednsb wrote:
the link to download is no longer working. I think this might be a dead product
Bummer!
I haven’t had time to check.
Send me a PM with your email address and I'll send you a copy.
Jeffers wrote:
I have had an Epson V550 for six years and am very happy with it. It does slides, 35mm negatives and photos. Problem is, if you buy it at Amazon, the price has skyrocketed from the price I paid, $149.99, to $693.92. Amazon appears to no longer have the best deal in town. I recently had to replace my Canon printer and found out they're like toilet paper was three months ago. I scoured the local stores for two weeks, and nobody had the printer I wanted. But Amazon had it for about $50 more than the local asking prices. I finally broke down and bought it from Amazon. Bottom line, whatever you decide to buy, you might want to shop around.
I have had an Epson V550 for six years and am very... (
show quote)
Next step UP is the V600, ONLY $229 @ amazon (same price at B&H and Adorama)
rfmaude41 wrote:
Next step UP IS the V600, ONLY $229 @ amazon (same price at B&H and Adorama)
Great solution for prints. I’ve got thousands of slides up next.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.