Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
After 6 month in for repair...
Page <prev 2 of 2
Aug 23, 2020 12:13:30   #
Thomas902 Loc: Washington DC
 
Sue you have an excellent visual aesthetic.
And your work is extremely commendable... as I have previously shared with you...

Ok I wasn't quite clear enough about what a "Pro Build" lens actual is...
Sadly your Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 is at best a high end "prosumer" glass
This Tamron is a "Pumper" zoom; the front extends as zoomed longer.
As such it sucks ambient air into the lenses' internal components... which can find it's way back onto your DSLR body... and this is even worse on the Z6 if you use an adapter...

An actual "Pro-Build" lenses not only has a rubber gasket around the lens mount it is also what is known as an "IF" (Internal Focus) lens... Not a pumper... no air moves into or out of the lens as it is zoomed or focused.

However the AF 24-70mm f/2.8 VR IF FX Nikkor is a true "Pro-Build" No air moves into or out of this lens as it is zoomed or focused. Important Note: the older Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED is a pumper... it's length varies as zoomed... avoid this lens if you are shooting in adverse conditions... The price you pay for the non-pumper VR variant is a larger front filter (82mm verses 77mm on the 2.8G variant)

Those who shoot commercially were quick to pony up for the newer VR 2.8E variant when it was released in 2015 and still remains the "Workhorse" of commercial shooters.

Again I hope this helps Sue... Looking forward to more of your stellar imagery...

Reply
Aug 23, 2020 12:31:29   #
justhercamera Loc: NW Michigan
 
Thank you Thomas, I understand what you are saying and have read that before, but did not recall it. Your information is helpful and I will keep in mind for future purchases!

Reply
Aug 23, 2020 12:40:55   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
Good work, Sue! A true photographer, you hung in there.

Reply
 
 
Aug 23, 2020 14:33:47   #
justhercamera Loc: NW Michigan
 
UTMike wrote:
Good work, Sue! A true photographer, you hung in there.


Thanks Mike. At that point, I was as "in" as I was going to be, as long as I stayed on the pier, and despite the flash, we were safe, and we watched carefully for changing conditions from that point.

Reply
Aug 23, 2020 19:22:47   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
justhercamera wrote:
Thomas

Yes, you have been very generous with your comments on work I have posted here, I remember well. I know those two cameras are not weather sealed such as the D3-D6, etc line. Because I shoot for passion, not pay, I never really considered needing the highest end for weather sealing, etc. It certainly is worth giving thought to. The lens used was the Tamron 24-70 2.8 and it is weather sealed, so that part I did right. LOL

I considered when I did the posting that maybe it was not the best place for it, but wasn't sure. I don't know if I can move it now, or not.

As always, your thoughts are very appreciated as is your time to give them.

Sue
Thomas br br Yes, you have been very generous wit... (show quote)


Your D850 is PROFESSIONAL GRADE and PROFESSIONALLY WEATHER SEALED. Yes, it is as good as the D3, D3s, D4, D4s, D5 or D6. That said my D5, D4s, D850 stay at home when it's raining. No camera, repeat, no camera is waterproof unless it is designed for under water use. And you can take that to the bank.
Watersealed and weathersealed is NOT waterproof.

Reply
Aug 23, 2020 21:00:04   #
justhercamera Loc: NW Michigan
 
billnikon wrote:
Your D850 is PROFESSIONAL GRADE and PROFESSIONALLY WEATHER SEALED. Yes, it is as good as the D3, D3s, D4, D4s, D5 or D6. That said my D5, D4s, D850 stay at home when it's raining. No camera, repeat, no camera is waterproof unless it is designed for under water use. And you can take that to the bank.
Watersealed and weathersealed is NOT waterproof.


Thank you for your input, Bill. My D850 (and z6) have both been exposed to some light rain, but I do try to keep my cameras dry, overall. I am grateful for the great lakes being freshwater, or the outcome of last night may have been far different.

Reply
Aug 24, 2020 07:44:17   #
jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana
 
Nice lighthouse, Sue.

Reply
 
 
Aug 24, 2020 11:20:43   #
Earnest Botello Loc: Hockley, Texas
 
Very good set, Sue, #2 is great.

Reply
Aug 24, 2020 11:35:53   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
billnikon wrote:
A Nick on the sensor and the mirror you say, I wonder how that happened? And the next thing you know your replacement gets wet. You may be one of those who would be well severed by high risk insurance.


OMG!!! Well severed??? Now that sounds pretty brutal and would definitely be in the high risk bracket of insurance companies.

Posted with tongue completely in my right cheek,

Dennis

Reply
Aug 24, 2020 11:40:34   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
Sorry to hear of the wave crashing over you and your camera. Living on the California coast I am really careful about taking any of my cameras near the water. On windy days I don't even go out on an ocean pier for fear the salt spray will damage/corrode parts of the camera. I hope your camera ends up still doing well.

Dennis

Reply
Aug 24, 2020 11:42:35   #
willaim Loc: Sunny Southern California
 
That's an interesting shot of the first photo. Like the second, the best. Like the way it leads your eyes from the waves to the light house.

Reply
 
 
Aug 24, 2020 13:40:53   #
John from gpwmi Loc: Michigan
 
Seems to be working, Sue. But, I think I'd try a lot of test shots away from the water.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.