Has any of you UHHers had experience with the Fuji X-A5? I would appreciate your comments, good or bad. How much of a negative is the absence of a viewfinder? Thanks.
Camera minus EVF = phone.
User ID wrote:
Camera minus EVF = phone.
You are probably right, but even with my latest iPhone SE, I don't get the IQ that I get from my 16MP Olympus EPL 5. Maybe it's the photographer!!
mffox wrote:
You are probably right, but even with my latest iPhone SE, I don't get the IQ that I get from my 16MP Olympus EPL 5. Maybe it's the photographer!!
If I don’t have a viewfinder then IQ is of no concern to me. OTOH if a device has superior IQ then it’s certainly worth being able to accurately compose and focus the intended high IQ image.
mffox wrote:
Has any of you UHHers had experience with the Fuji X-A5? I would appreciate your comments, good or bad. How much of a negative is the absence of a viewfinder? Thanks.
Speaking for myself, I think you would be very pleased with your X-A5, EVF or not. I bought a Sony RX 100 Miii and had to that point been using Samsung Note8, with a very good cellphone camera. Mine does have an electronic view finder though I find I have rarely used it. Immediately you will notice a depth of field and fullness from your camera that you just couldn't obtain from the cellphone. It looks like the X-A5 would be small enough that you might be inclined to carry it more often, and again, I think you will be very pleased with the purchase of it. This is just the viewpoint of an extreme novice, but a happy one.
I switched to Fuji. Purchased an X-3 - handles like my long gone Leica M2, but much lighter. Feeling a need for a backup body, purchased a mint X-A5 and later, a refurbished X-A3. Both are great; take all X mount lenses with great electronics. I even like the Q menu feature - which some don’t.
Now the down side. No viewfinder, No viewfinder, No viewfinder. Outdoors you are effectively shooting blind... blind... and blind. For inside they are fine. But... I don’t like the touch screen take-a-pic thing. Way to sensitive and you can’t turn it OFF permanently.
Now my walk around is the X-E3 with 23mm prime lens. My second body is an X-T1 which lives with 2 zoom lenses in a Domke bag. X-T1 is older, all metal, and without all the so-called “improvements” of the X-T2,3,4, etc. Like my f:stops on the lens barrel and shutter speeds on the top. Rest is non-essential. See Ken Rockwell on the X-T1.
mffox wrote:
Has any of you UHHers had experience with the Fuji X-A5? I would appreciate your comments, good or bad. How much of a negative is the absence of a viewfinder? Thanks.
Forget it.
The X-E3 cost a little more but runs rings around the X-A5 imho.
It is what it is - high point is it uses great lenses, low point is no viewfinder. Cheap way for a backup body or to use other lenses with an adapter. I'd get a real fuji used for the same money.
Great IQ at a relatively inexpensive price. Less than alot of phones.
IQ not a function of a viewfinder. You can accurately compose and focus on the lcd screen.
What price are you looking at? The newer model X-A7 is on sale $499.
X-E3 is great but no tilting screen and higher price.
JohnR
Loc: The Gates of Hell
User ID wrote:
Camera minus EVF = phone.
Can't find the keypad on my Olympus E-PL5 - and it doesn't have voice control either. Just can't seem to make a call with it no matter what I try
fehutch wrote:
I switched to Fuji. . My second body is an X-T1 which lives with 2 zoom lenses in a Domke bag. X-T1 is older, all metal, and without all the so-called “improvements” of the X-T2,3,4, etc. Like my f:stops on the lens barrel and shutter speeds on the top. Rest is non-essential. See Ken Rockwell on the X-T1.
I too love my XT-1. Just as I loved my Nikon FM so many years ago. Just a sensible, elegant little workhorse of a camera. It does not do all sorts of exotica, but what it does do, it does well!
Hadn’t thought about, but you right. X-T1 and my Nikon F (film days). A lot in common. No meter prism, ASA 400 settings in my head. See Fred hutchings, Hurricane Camille. But now we re off topic. Apologies
CatMarley wrote:
I too love my XT-1. Just as I loved my Nikon FM so many years ago. Just a sensible, elegant little workhorse of a camera. It does not do all sorts of exotica, but what it does do, it does well!
I loved my Nikon FM too Cat, but I loved it more than any digital camera I've used.
It was a better "machine" to use than my D700... which imho is as
good to useas any digital body (Canon does not come close) under 5 digits.
Having said that, a D3 I used was darn nice to control and maybe challenge the D700...
but not the FM... crisp but light controls, an exquisite mechanical feedback.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.