UTEP65 wrote:
I am relatively new to hobby photography. I have a Nikon D7200. I am interested in landscape, wildlife, etc. photography. I want a good tripod. I am on a “retiree” budget. Any recommendations? Thanks.
The most important criterion from a functional point of view is the stability it provides. How much stability you'll need is directly related to one thing - image magnification, and by extension, camera focal length and working distance. There is no point in spending $100 or any amount of money if it doesn't suit your purpose.
Landscape photography is among the least demanding. Typically done with short telephoto down to wide angle lenses, you'll be fine with many lower cost tripods.
If you are using long lenses and shooting wildlife, you may want to consider something with more stability - and correspondingly more expensive.
Another important consideration is tripod weight - you can get a very heavy duty aluminum tripod that can weigh as much as 14 lbs - but do you really want to carry that in the field for wildlife photography?
Carbon fiber is the current material of choice - extremely light and rigid. And the range of tripod weights starts at about 2 lbs and goes to around 7 lbs - with the 7 lb tripods typically selected by photoraphers doing serious wildlife photography with 600mm or longer lenses. A rule of thumb is to look at the top tube leg thickness. Gitzo and Induro have categorized their lines by leg thickness. You can see in the attached images how Gitzo makes their recommendation based on leg thickness vs focal length.
In general, a carbon tripod is 1/2 to 1/3 the weight of an aluminum alloy tripod, and will have 2-4X the load capacity and rigidity. With today's cameras and lenses you'd have to have a seriously heavy camera to exceed the load capacity of just about any tripod on the market. Moreover, load capacity is not the best criterion to judge stability. A metal tripod with a 15 lb load capacity that itself weighs nearly 6 lbs is no match for a 2lb carbon fiber tripod that has a load capacity of 55 lbs. However, the metal tripod may be sufficient for landscape use, even if it weighs 6 lbs.
I am not suggesting that you buy a Gitzo, or any other specific brand. I am suggesting that you consider the factors that matter, and make a decision that will minimize buyer's remorse down the road. I am a retiree as well, and I look for value, not price. One can get a tripod that can come pretty close in performance to a Gitzo, Induro, RRS and spend up to 50% less than the premium brands.
Also, the least reliable place to get tripod reviews, other than Ken Rockwell's site, would be user reviews. These reviews are neither critical nor thorough. They take the form of "I just got this great tripod and I love it". These people rarely lack a wide basis for comparison and likely have never used a quality tripod in demanding conditions - so I suggest you thake those with a grain of salt or just dismiss them altogether.
A "good" tripod and "retiree" budget are very vague terms, and as you can see, can mean a lot of things to a lot of people. Let's find out what lenses you have and what you plan to take pictures of that you'll need a tripod for.
Rdgreenwood hits the nail on the head with a responsible approach to selecting a tripod and being careful about buying inadequate ones. He also has great advice on using a tripod with a center section - avoid it if at all possible.