Might be interesting if they were in focus.
I thought they were. It's microscope. Light is funny in a microscope.
Meadwilliam wrote:
Might be interesting if they were in focus.
Actually, most of them are in focus, but, the DOF is so short that they appear to be out-of-focus.
That's the trick. I like to try to capture three dimensional things. Ther will usually be a range where things are in focus. Sometimes, you have to use the out-of-focus places to frame what is in focus. It's almost like saying, "...and so forth."
Don Schaeffer wrote:
I thought they were. It's microscope. Light is funny in a microscope.
Yes, but there are stacking programs for microscopic photography.
When used, the photos can be absolutely amazing in clarity and detail. Far beyond the macro seen at UHH.
Bill
I tried a stacking app. I'm just not disciplined enough to use it.
Don Schaeffer wrote:
I tried a stacking app. I'm just not disciplined enough to use it.
I had a friend with a scope, microscopic capability direct to a beefed up, designated computer to handle the program.
A large splurge, would not disclose price.
First we built a table with three inch pipe legs, thru the out building's floor and poured in concrete in the ground.
A top, 3x4 feet by 4 inches thick of concrete and crushed quartz (better bonding, no fracturing) was formed and poured in place.
Troweled to an almost mirror finish and sealed. He was a Mason, he did that part.
It took all that to get started.
Needless to say, not much vibration, except the day of the earthquake.
His insect work was a ten, very professional, and he was a 'hobbyist'.
Enjoyed your presentation. Thank you.
Bill
Yeah. I met some guys who are incredible technicians and do things like that. I'm 80 yearso old and live in a basement room. I couldn't even dream of that k0ind of thing when no I was 30.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.