PaulG wrote:
And not nice t-ts? Aaah, that's because you can't see 'em.
Indeed PaulG, you got it.
An amazing opportunity to do this photoshoot. You subject/model/artist has both strength and an appreciation for posing. Just jealous!
I'm sure you had a great time shooting this series and you both did a great job!
Fotoartist wrote:
I snuck around behind her for this shot. I was then shooting into the lights and other photographers. I only took a couple shots and then had to retouch the lights, flare, and other photographers out in this pic.
When it came to her skin, yes I had to lighten it quite a bit in post as it was in shadow. In fact, as far as her skin goes in this whole series, all I did was take out the red marks, and roughness from the ropes. And this was very acceptable in light of its temporariness.
I also feel that when you use a heavy skin smoothing treatment on a nude it's almost like you are giving her a coat of plastic that hides her nakedness to a degree. Since this lady was billed as The Naked Aerialist I had to leave her like that.
I snuck around behind her for this shot. I was the... (
show quote)
Hey Photoartist;
your work is very very good and well appreciated as you can read. Not just on the topic thread but other posts on other threads where you have posted. PLEASE do not be stingy and keep them coming. I know you mentioned before some images border on, well, 'the edge' but hey, throw them out here anyway.
So, your work is very very good and well appreciated.
Thank you.
Bruce.
riderxlx wrote:
Hey Photoartist;
your work is very very good and well appreciated as you can read. Not just on the topic thread but other posts on other threads where you have posted. PLEASE do not be stingy and keep them coming. I know you mentioned before some images border on, well, 'the edge' but hey, throw them out here anyway.
So, your work is very very good and well appreciated.
Thank you.
Bruce.
Thanks for your comments. I do have shots that I like a lot but am holding back because they are definitely explicit, lets's say a yoga pose, that have good composition, lighting, sharpness, etc.
Fotoartist wrote:
Thanks for your comments. I do have shots that I like a lot but am holding back because they are definitely explicit, lets's say a yoga pose, that have good composition, lighting, sharpness, etc.
Yes I understand, most of the guys here probably do not care. If they are explicit well so be it.
YOUR work already speaks for itself.
You need not make exceptions for the timid, if so, they should not be on this topic anyway.
Anyway, that is my free happy hour comment for today.
I will restate my previous comments, YOUR work is exceptional and very well done and appreciated, not only this topic but all the others you post.
Peace be with you brother.
Bruce.
This truly was an interesting series. You were quite lucky to have connected with this model, who was aerialist, and was willing to do it in the Nude! Once in a lifetime opp.!
Also, you’ve had some excitement up there in the Motor City. Today. WOW!
This entire series has been filled with spectacular images. Outstanding shots and editing.
Well....Post ‘em and let the chips fall where they may!
Some people like long hair, some like short. Some like pubic hair, some like shaven. Some like labia, some don’t. If it looks like Art, and not like Sex, then it’s not porn!!!
Some people can look at a Foot...and see it as sex!
ps. some will agree with me, some won’t.
LOL LOL
I like the full set of these pics ... something different and well done.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.