DaveO wrote:
Really? How about searching for verification on the items themselves.
Here’s the sequence......
1st post, InfiniteISO:
“Glad you pointed this out. Every set of numbers I've seen published are manipulated to make the US look bad.
Here's the deal: No matter how bad the US numbers seem, their perceived severity has nothing to do with our Federal response. A larger percentage of cases were caused by mishandling at the State level. Last time I checked the Feds didn't insist on seeding COVID cases in nursing homes or running mass transit systems with no mask requirements or sanitation programs.
The truth of the matter is the working population of the US cannot shelter in place until there is a vaccine AND save our economy. As a population, the US was asked to stay at home until we could handle the spread. We did that and now we're going to handle the spread. As a retired person, the OP may not get that. When bread hits $10 a loaf, the OP MAY get that. The demographic that has to worry most about this pandemic can keep their head down, the rest of us need to get back to work.”
2nd post, you to InfiniteISO:
“You may wish to consider checking various news sources to verify your suppositions”
3rd post, me to you:
“Are you questioning the existence of the Cuomo/Murphy death marches into the long term care facilities? Or the fact that NYC did, in fact, open public transportation to the homeless?
Which "news" of his are you questioning the source of?”
4th post, you to me:
“If you need to ask while continuing your political posturing, searching for answers other than the ones you seek to suit your agenda would be a waste of time.”
Now......the 4th post is a clear political statement as it refers to the facts I posted in the 3rd as political posturing. You might not like the reality, but I stated exactly what happened.
Now part II: So, exactly what “searching for verification on the items themselves” is required in this sequence????