Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Lens Advice
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jun 9, 2020 21:22:08   #
FTn
 
Let me start out by saying that I shoot with a D850 and love it. Keep in mind though the D850 demands very sharp lenses to really take advantage of its 45 megapixel sensor. According to Photgraphylife.com very few of Nikon's current F mount lenses can resolve adequate detail on modern high resolution cameras. Read their article Why Nikon Should Not Make DSLRs Over 36 Megapixels. I have found that the lenses that they recommend for the D850 is pretty spot on.

- FTn

Reply
Jun 9, 2020 22:49:56   #
DaveyDitzer Loc: Western PA
 
Call me nuts if you like, but here is what I did and still do. If I am considering a particular focal range, I buy a less expensive lens on ebay and use it to see if the focal range is what I want. Then if that's what I want, I can buy a much better lens and sell the first one. One such candidate is my Nikon AF 16-35 f3.5-4.5 D lens. It was used from a pawn shop with good Ebay ratings and I liked it, kept it and don't have to move on. Make sure your camera body can accommodate the lens you like, e.g., my FF camera bodies have a motor to drive the AF lens. If I wanted more IQ, then I know what to look for and consider any loss in reselling as a "rental fee".

Reply
Jun 9, 2020 23:07:33   #
Photec
 
DaveyDitzer wrote:
Call me nuts if you like, but here is what I did and still do. If I am considering a particular focal range, I buy a less expensive lens on ebay and use it to see if the focal range is what I want. Then if that's what I want, I can buy a much better lens and sell the first one. One such candidate is my Nikon AF 16-35 f3.5-4.5 D lens. It was used from a pawn shop with good Ebay ratings and I liked it, kept it and don't have to move on. Make sure your camera body can accommodate the lens you like, e.g., my FF camera bodies have a motor to drive the AF lens. If I wanted more IQ, then I know what to look for and consider any loss in reselling as a "rental fee".
Call me nuts if you like, but here is what I did a... (show quote)


This is what was posted as the best 6 lenses for the D850: https://photophique.com/best-nikon-d850-lenses/

Reply
 
 
Jun 10, 2020 07:04:43   #
cameraf4 Loc: Delaware
 
DaveyDitzer wrote:
Call me nuts if you like, but here is what I did and still do. If I am considering a particular focal range, I buy a less expensive lens on ebay and use it to see if the focal range is what I want. Then if that's what I want, I can buy a much better lens and sell the first one. One such candidate is my Nikon AF 16-35 f3.5-4.5 D lens. It was used from a pawn shop with good Ebay ratings and I liked it, kept it and don't have to move on. Make sure your camera body can accommodate the lens you like, e.g., my FF camera bodies have a motor to drive the AF lens. If I wanted more IQ, then I know what to look for and consider any loss in reselling as a "rental fee".
Call me nuts if you like, but here is what I did a... (show quote)


Hey, Nutsey, that's actually not a bad idea.

Reply
Jun 10, 2020 10:20:16   #
FTn
 
Photec wrote:
This is what was posted as the best 6 lenses for the D850: https://photophique.com/best-nikon-d850-lenses/


It looks like photophique's basis for selection was convenience and price. The 28-300mm Nikon lens is one of softest lenses in the Nikon lineup especially above 200mm. Using it on a D850 defeats the purpose of buying a 45 megapixel camera. The Nikon 35mm f1.4 does not have the resolving power to give you the sharpest images on a D850. Only Nikon's 20mm f1.8 and 28mm f1.4 can do that. I don't know much about Tamron and Sigma lenses. I have never shot with them. I would instead go with Nikon's 24-70 f2.8, non VR, and the 105mm f2.8 Micro Nikkor. Staying with the same manufacturer for both camera bodies and lenses removes the finger pointing if you have a problem. The 200-500mm f5.6 barely exceeds 36 megapixels at 300mm f5.6 so I'm not sure that this heavy lens is a best pick for a D850. My gut tells me that the 500mm f5.6 might be a better choice but I have never had a chance to shoot with one. This is only my opinion.

- FTn

Reply
Jun 10, 2020 10:24:07   #
DaveyDitzer Loc: Western PA
 
that and the fact that the 500 f5.6 seems to scarce even at its lofty price.

Reply
Jun 10, 2020 10:38:59   #
Paul Diamond Loc: Atlanta, GA, USA
 
Photec wrote:
This is what was posted as the best 6 lenses for the D850: https://photophique.com/best-nikon-d850-lenses/


As a D850 owner, I have and use many of the recommended lenses. Suggest you go to dxomark.com, input the D850, select the fixed/zoom range of interest and see their test results. When you do, click on the top of the "sharpness" column so it now becomes the primary selection sorting of the test results, highest sharpness performance first.

I have the Sigma ART 50mm F/1.4, the great Nikon 200-500 zoom, the Tamron 90mm macro, the Nikon and Tokina 24-70 (Tokina is sharper but less weather sealed), Tamron 15-30 for wide vistas and nature close ups. Don't feel a burning need for more glass at this time, just more opportunities to use what I've got. (Have added a 600mm F4 prime, not arrived yet, for birds/nature.)

Predict you will enjoy your D850 as you learn to use it and its features. You will want the best lenses you can afford. Wide angle with nature or buildings/architecture, etc. should have low distortion and great control of chromatic aberration. Ultrawides and wide zooms are somewhat notorious for distortion and aberrations at wide angle views.

Reply
 
 
Jun 10, 2020 11:14:06   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
TonyBrown wrote:
I currently use a Nikon D500 and shoot mainly wildlife. While the camera is very good for other uses, I have always wanted a Full Frame camera and am planning to get a Nikon D850. I will keep the D500 for Wildlife and will look to use the D850 for Landscape and Wildlife. My question is what is the best lens for Landscape. I currently have a range of Zoom and Prime lenses(200-500, 80-400, 500 and 300)and a few other lenses(16-85 DX, 35, and a 18-300). I have looked at the 24-70 f2.8E, which seems to get mixed reviews for the money and the size of the lens seems to mean that expensive filters(Lee system) are the main option to maintain quality. The 24-120 has a greater range, but I am worried that the quality may not be as good as the 24-70. Any advice would be appreciated.
I currently use a Nikon D500 and shoot mainly wild... (show quote)

I would use a series of lenses, where no lens ranges more 3X focal length - long range forces designers into too many compromises.

Reply
Jun 10, 2020 18:07:05   #
wwjd38 Loc: Wyoming
 
TonyBrown wrote:
I currently use a Nikon D500 and shoot mainly wildlife. While the camera is very good for other uses, I have always wanted a Full Frame camera and am planning to get a Nikon D850. I will keep the D500 for Wildlife and will look to use the D850 for Landscape and Wildlife. My question is what is the best lens for Landscape. I currently have a range of Zoom and Prime lenses(200-500, 80-400, 500 and 300)and a few other lenses(16-85 DX, 35, and a 18-300). I have looked at the 24-70 f2.8E, which seems to get mixed reviews for the money and the size of the lens seems to mean that expensive filters(Lee system) are the main option to maintain quality. The 24-120 has a greater range, but I am worried that the quality may not be as good as the 24-70. Any advice would be appreciated.
I currently use a Nikon D500 and shoot mainly wild... (show quote)


The 24-70 F2.8L is a great versatile lens. I use it for landscape and love it. I shot this photo at the beginning of sunrise. I do shoot Canon and not Nikon, but my friend that I go shooting with has a Nikon and shoots with a 24-70 F2.8 also. Her photo's turn out wonderful.


(Download)

Reply
Jun 24, 2020 07:25:24   #
User ID
 
Mac wrote:
Nikon has some very good and inexpensive wide angle AF lenses any one of which could fill your need as long as you are ok with using an aperture ring.

AF Nikkor 24mm f/2D
AF Nikkor 28mm f/2.8D
AF Nikkor 35mm f/2D


Yes really great and not overpriced.

Actually better than you indicate:

No need to understand the aperture ring. Just set the lockout on it and control aperture from the camera body same as with the newer lenses.

Reply
Jun 26, 2020 13:44:33   #
Keen
 
The Nikon 16-35mm, Nikon 17-35mm, Nikon 14-24mm, and Tamron 15-30mm Would be worth considering. There is no one all around ‘Best’. One may have truer color, while having less focal range, or being unable to use filters, or such. If you live by filters, two of the above will be useless....or only useful at greater trouble, and expense. If you don’t use filters, it will depend on other factors. Only you can decide. I am going with the 17-35mm Nikon f/2.8.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.