authorizeduser wrote:
I have a Canon 80D which is about 3 years old and has the original Canon battery which came with it. I fear the battery is failing because after charging for over 24 hrs, the camera reports a 60% charge and after taking 80 photos I have only 2 bars left.
Here is my question. I was ready to pay the $63 B&H wants for an QEM battery. Several people have recommended I try a Wasabi battery. A single battery is $10.99 vs $63. Now I know when things sound too good to be true, they usually are. There has to be a reason the OEM is so much more money.
Anyone have any experience with Wasabi batteries who can shed some light on this?
Thanks to all who respond
I have a Canon 80D which is about 3 years old and ... (
show quote)
I've used Wasabi (and other 3rd party) batteries in the past and they were fine....
BUT, those were replacements for the simpler Canon BP511 and BP511A I was using at the time.
The newer LP-E6 and LP-E6N that you and I use now are different. They're "smart" batteries, with added "controller" circuitry of some sort.
I don't claim to know the details of these newer batteries, and can't say one way or another about Wasabi in particular.... but
some third party "replacements" for LP-E6/E6N cannot be charged in the Canon OEM charger, require a different type of charger for some reason. I have been led to believe it has to do with the way the Canon charge interacts with the battery and that the 3rd party don't have the circuitry to do so. Plus, that type of 3rd party battery also won't "report" with as much detail in the camera and may not show their charge state as accurately, though they will work to power the camera. I would ask if it can be charged in the OEM Canon charger, before buying any third party battery. I'd avoid any that can't.
Instead, when it comes to LP-E6 I "bit the bullet", paid the price and bought Canon OEM. It was worse when Canon first introduced them (along with the 5D Mark II, if I recall). Back then they were selling for $100 or more apiece. Both the list price was higher and retailers were marking them up farther because they were in short supply. (The first spare LP-E6 I got for my 5D Mark II battery grip I had to buy from Canada and paid $125 for!)
One nice thing... I get a lot more "shots per charge" with my LP-E6/E6N. With the old BP511A I had to carry two spares for each battery I had in a camera... often that was three cameras, each with a grip = a total of 18 batteries (which is why I bought some of the cheaper third party batteries). Now with LP-E6/E6N I only need to carry one backup for each battery in my cameras ... up to three cameras, each with a grip = 12 batteries total.
BTW, if your camera and battery have sat unused for quite a while, you might go through several charge/use & drain/recharge cycles and see if it starts taking a fuller charge and giving you more shots per charge. I've had batteries that sat unused for a long time get so drained that at first they wouldn't take a full charge... But after a half dozen or so drain/recharge cycles they bounced back nicely and were usable. I don't know if that will work for you with an LP-E6/E6N. (I have some of those that I've been using in various cameras for eight or nine years that are still working fine... But they do get used and recharged fairly regularly.)
EDIT: Also, there are rumors of a new LP-E6N coming soon... higher capacity and probably introduced alongside the anticipated EOS R5 mirrorless that's likely to be announced this summer. Supposedly it will be fully backward compatible for use in cameras that used LP-E6N and LP-E6 (and those batts will be usable in the R5?). If so, there might be a close-out sale on the "old" LP-E6N.