The Moon 2 Which of these do you like better
Apr 8, 2020 11:38:57 #
SENSORLOUPE wrote:
I guess I'm the only one for #2!! But that is my choice. I think it because of the contrast
My thoughts, exactly.
Apr 8, 2020 15:10:16 #
Merlin1300 wrote:
Hard to tell - - please save original.
Longshadow wrote:
Of the two that you see, not a third.
I can barely see the 2 Jim posted. Of the two that you see, not a third.OK Fine - - of the diminutive thumbnail images posted, #1 works best for me
Apr 8, 2020 15:47:35 #
Fotoartist wrote:
I'd go with the lower contrast and super sharpen it. And then send a download.
Apr 8, 2020 15:50:54 #
Merlin1300 wrote:
I can barely see the 2 Jim posted.
OK Fine - - of the diminutive thumbnail images posted, #1 works best for me
OK Fine - - of the diminutive thumbnail images posted, #1 works best for me
Y'all on a phone???
Apr 8, 2020 15:56:09 #
Longshadow wrote:
Given the size of the images posted, we all might as well be Y'all on a phone???
Apr 8, 2020 16:08:16 #
Merlin1300 wrote:
Given the size of the images posted, we all might as well be
Wow, they look fine on my laptop.
Like a 3R print.
Apr 8, 2020 16:28:00 #
Longshadow wrote:
Well that explains it. Your laptop must be the same size as my cell phone ??Wow, they look fine on my laptop. Like a 3R print.
Apr 8, 2020 16:37:47 #
Merlin1300 wrote:
Well that explains it. Your laptop must be the same size as my cell phone ??
3-1/2 x 5 is not objectionable, I grew up with 3R prints.
I measured it, actually 4x6 on my screen with no screen magnification.
133% fills my browser window.
Apr 8, 2020 16:55:05 #
Longshadow wrote:
On my screen the actual image of the moon is 3" in diameter. 3-1/2 x 5 is not objectionable, I grew up with 3R prints. I measured it, actually 4x6 on my screen with no screen magnification.
133% fills my browser window.
133% fills my browser window.
This parks almost unnoticeably in the upper left corner of my 35" monitor.
Right Clicking and downloading the image as posted reveals an ENORMOUS file size of 20KB.
I can expand it just a little bit before pixelation sets in.
Such a TINY thumbnail makes any real determination of quality unreliable at best.
The images should have been posted with the "save original" box checked.
Apr 8, 2020 17:09:21 #
Merlin1300 wrote:
On my screen the actual image of the moon is 3&quo... (show quote)
For people using Panavision...
Apr 8, 2020 18:46:06 #
Longshadow wrote:
You no longer make any meaningful replies, nor offer any logical rejoinders to my comments. The images as posted by the OP are insufficient to answer his questions. Anyone can take snapshots of the moon. With the OP's equipment (Canon 1dmk4, Canon 2x II, Canon 500 f4), he should have uploaded, at minimum, 5MB JPGs for review and comment. I think you and I are done here.For people using Panavision...
Apr 8, 2020 19:11:40 #
Merlin1300 wrote:
You no longer make any meaningful replies, nor offer any logical rejoinders to my comments. The images as posted by the OP are insufficient to answer his questions. Anyone can take snapshots of the moon. With the OP's equipment (Canon 1dmk4, Canon 2x II, Canon 500 f4), he should have uploaded, at minimum, 5MB JPGs for review and comment. I think you and I are done here.
Which of the two seems easy enough for me.
Have a great evening.
Apr 8, 2020 21:02:08 #
Apr 8, 2020 21:20:53 #
Merlin1300 wrote:
Given the size of the images posted, we all might as well be
Well Merlin, go take your own pictures and post them any size you want to
Apr 8, 2020 21:26:45 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.