I have the Sidekick I use with my Sony 400 2.8 and converters and it works just fine. I decided on the Sidekick over a standard gimbal primarily for travel when I am shooting wildlife and landscape. It attaches to the ballhead simply and quickly and prevents having to switch tripod heads in the field which is a pain in the butt. Also a little less weight when traveling.
The movements are smooth and precise but panning depends on the quality of your ballhead.
The only thing I am not crazy about is the side mount for the lens foot as opposed to a bottom mount like most gimbal heads use. Just need to be a little more careful when mounting the camera/lens to it.
If I knew that I would be using only a super telephoto and didn’t need a ballhead then I would prefer a gimbal head.
The quality of the locking mechanisms on your ballhead is important when hiking around with your rig over your shoulder so your camera/lens assembly doesn’t flop around due to the weight. My original ballhead was a little too small to prevent this so I bought a bigger ballhead which solved the problem.
For my purposes the Sidekick works quite well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XU_gAV5rLuk Check this out. He has a couple of vids on them. To me it makes sence. I'll probably purchase a new tripod in the next couple of weeks & am thinking of trying the fluid head. Not as compact & do not know about the weight as far as packing in on hikes.
tcthome wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XU_gAV5rLuk Check this out. He has a couple of vids on them. To me it makes sence. I'll probably purchase a new tripod in the next couple of weeks & am thinking of trying the fluid head. Not as compact & do not know about the weight as far as packing in on hikes.
Very Interesting concept using a Fluid Head like a Gimbal.
Rdphoto3 wrote:
I get shake now having the Camera and the 200-500 on top of the Acratech.
According to the Acratech website the GP ballhead can be used as a gimbal, which you already know. But the website also said it can be used as a gimbal with lenses from 100-400mm, and you said you are using the GP as a gimbal with the Nikon 200-500mm, which might exceed the limits of the GP ballhead.
I have 2 Acratech ballheads and I like them, but I am also not using them as a gimbal though. Using the 200-500mm on the GP as a gimbal may be what is causing the shake you said you have now.
Vince68 wrote:
According to the Acratech website the GP ballhead can be used as a gimbal, which you already know. But the website also said it can be used as a gimbal with lenses from 100-400mm, and you said you are using the GP as a gimbal with the Nikon 200-500mm, which might exceed the limits of the GP ballhead.
I have 2 Acratech ballheads and I like them, but I am also not using them as a gimbal though. Using the 200-500mm on the GP as a gimbal may be what is causing the shake you said you have now.
According to the Acratech website the GP ballhead ... (
show quote)
I think Acratech should have spec'ed it as a weight and not the mm. The shake I get is when I use the Head as normal and not in Gimbal Mode. I think my Tripod/Head Combo is slightly too light duty and might be one problem.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.