CamB wrote:
All these people who say they would take a gun on their photo shoot makes me wonder where they are going. 80% of my pictures are taken in Alaska, my home, and I would only take a gun (rifle) if I was going into a known grizzly area, like Admiralty Island... I have no problem with guns, but on a photo outing? I don't get it.
In Alabama, if you go into the woods without a firearm, you are an idiot.
"Bad guys" or "big, dangerous predators" are not the main reason to be armed.
It is:
the rattlesnakes (when they get too close to inhabited areas with children, otherwise, leave them alone)
the packs of coyotes (which have staged several attacks on people around here - even in the subdivisions)
the feral dogs (domesticated animals gone back to the wild and extremely aggressive towards ANY creature)
the rabid raccoons (few, thankfully, but still extant)
the occasional hungry bobcat (they get stupid when they get hungry) and
the full-grown cougar we have prowling around in the woods across the road. (Oops, Alabama doesn't have cougars - yeah, right. Tell that to the horse hospital next door that had to close because of one who thought it was a big kitty buffet.)
The black bears only come off the mountain (those of you in the West feel free to laugh) when there is a drought and food gets scarce.
They would rather eat than attack.
Just leave them alone and they usually ignore you.
If they don't, they might growl at you to tell you you are too close for their comfort, but backing off usually results in them going back to shoveling food in their face.
That being said, some of the best photo subjects are in the woods.
The abundance and variety of wildlife, down here, is amazing.
In spite of all the people problems, it really is a beautiful place to be.