she shouted, "No"
What part of the word "NO" is difficult to understand?
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
Mike M wrote:
Two weeks ago on a Sunday afternoon, I walked out on a crowded Oceanside, California pier. There was a lady sitting on a bench with arms outstretched with three pigeons perched on each arm. That's not a sight I see everyday so I stopped to take a photo. When I raised my camera she shouted, "No". I lowered the camera not sure if she was speaking to me. I raised it once again and she shouted, "get the hell out". I told her she was in the public domain and she shouted back, "I don't give a shit". I said okay and walked away without taking the picture. My question is this: is it legal to take someone's picture without their permission when they are out in public?
Two weeks ago on a Sunday afternoon, I walked out ... (
show quote)
So grasshopper, the more important question is, What have you learned from this experience? Let's hear what you have to say now.
Years ago, when I was doing some (legal) undercover work,I had a right-angle adaptor for my lens. If I wanted to take a picture of someone, I would point the camera 90 degrees away from them. They would never know I was taking their picture.
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
Mike M wrote:
Two weeks ago on a Sunday afternoon, I walked out on a crowded Oceanside, California pier. There was a lady sitting on a bench with arms outstretched with three pigeons perched on each arm. That's not a sight I see everyday so I stopped to take a photo. When I raised my camera she shouted, "No". I lowered the camera not sure if she was speaking to me. I raised it once again and she shouted, "get the hell out". I told her she was in the public domain and she shouted back, "I don't give a shit". I said okay and walked away without taking the picture. My question is this: is it legal to take someone's picture without their permission when they are out in public?
Two weeks ago on a Sunday afternoon, I walked out ... (
show quote)
Yes, pointing a camera at people is an invasion to THEIR privacy, NO MATTER WHERE THEY ARE.
Many, many folks on this site mistakenly think that if the person is in a public space, they can stick their camera's where ever they want and shoot who ever they want. Nothing could be further from the truth or the laws of the land.
Ask any judge that question and they will answer in a similar fashion. "People in public have a REASONABLE expectation of privacy". You see, our laws are based on, "what a reasonable person would do", and not what a NUT with a camera would do. You can put that in your pipe and smoke it.
User ID wrote:
Most "stolen" candid photos are second rate or
worse images anywho. Yes I've seen exceptions
but they are rare.
-
I disagree with this completely. If you’re looking for a portrait you ask, but candid is no longer candid if you ask. Often it’s trying to capture a moment. If someone sees you and asks you not to take it I would respect their wish, but I’m generally not asking first.
Oh and you really need to get a handle on your PP.
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
Truth hurts doesn't it. OK, if I'm wrong then you go to a public playground and start shooting kids playing. Go ahead, I dare you.
I was at Chicano Park near downtown San Diego a couple years back. There was a group of locals, yeah, I'll call them "locals". One of the women saw me shooting the murals and said to get her "pitcher", I swing my camera her direction and a second one loses her mind and followed me around, threatening me, AND my gear, for a good 20 minutes. I try to respect people's space, especially in their "home" which, apparently that park was their's.
Weirdest photo opportunity I've ever encountered.
I've had folks ask not to be photographed and I move on. When i shoot a shooting competition i ALWAYS tell each squad that if they DON'T want to be photographed, say so and I take a break while they shoot their stage. No harm, no foul.
When i shoot in public places I try to keep it general or as anonymous as possible. Better Karma for the day's shooting.
sb
Loc: Florida's East Coast
In a public space you are free to take someone's photograph without permission - the only problem would be if you were to use in for a commercial purpose: and of course you could be sued if you posted it with negative comments, etc.
So - you would have been within your rights to take her photo. On the other hand, I have always found the wisest thing is not to mess with people who may be just plain nuts.....
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
sb wrote:
In a public space you are free to take someone's photograph without permission - the only problem would be if you were to use in for a commercial purpose: and of course you could be sued if you posted it with negative comments, etc.
So - you would have been within your rights to take her photo. On the other hand, I have always found the wisest thing is not to mess with people who may be just plain nuts.....
SOOOOOOOO wrong. Everyone in America has a REASONABLE EXPECTATION of privacy, ask any judge you want, they will tell you the same thing.
As a rule, I respect the wish of others when doing photography. Consider that photography intrudes. I simply do not take a picture of someone who objects to it. I move on.
Mike M wrote:
Two weeks ago on a Sunday afternoon, I walked out on a crowded Oceanside, California pier. There was a lady sitting on a bench with arms outstretched with three pigeons perched on each arm. That's not a sight I see everyday so I stopped to take a photo. When I raised my camera she shouted, "No". I lowered the camera not sure if she was speaking to me. I raised it once again and she shouted, "get the hell out". I told her she was in the public domain and she shouted back, "I don't give a shit". I said okay and walked away without taking the picture. My question is this: is it legal to take someone's picture without their permission when they are out in public?
Two weeks ago on a Sunday afternoon, I walked out ... (
show quote)
Many people don't care about the law. Unfortunately, "might makes right." If you took her picture, you can imagine her running after you screaming, and you would look like the bad guy. The term isn't "public domain," by the way. If you're in a public place, you can take pictures of basically anything.
billnikon wrote:
SOOOOOOOO wrong. Everyone in America has a REASONABLE EXPECTATION of privacy, ask any judge you want, they will tell you the same thing.
Anyone out in public can expect whatever they want, but the law won't agree.
SteveLoker wrote:
I was at Chicano Park near downtown San Diego a couple years back. There was a group of locals, yeah, I'll call them "locals". One of the women saw me shooting the murals and said to get her "pitcher", I swing my camera her direction and a second one loses her mind and followed me around, threatening me, AND my gear, for a good 20 minutes. I try to respect people's space, especially in their "home" which, apparently that park was their's.
Weirdest photo opportunity I've ever encountered.
I've had folks ask not to be photographed and I move on. When i shoot a shooting competition i ALWAYS tell each squad that if they DON'T want to be photographed, say so and I take a break while they shoot their stage. No harm, no foul.
When i shoot in public places I try to keep it general or as anonymous as possible. Better Karma for the day's shooting.
I was at Chicano Park near downtown San Diego a co... (
show quote)
Yeah, people are awful. That's why I photograph landscapes and things. Everyone has their own opinion of their rights.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.