For me the prefered method is to figure out how to take good photos incorporating the tourists. But then what would I bitch about.
But seriously, most everything you want without people will be available on postcards and maybe slides. Ive seen plenty of postcard stalls on the streets of Rome, and all had photos of the trevi fountain.
We were there six years ago. Crowds were terrible but the scenery was wonderful. I think I blotted the crowds out of my memory, not so with Dubrovnik & Monserrat.
Lagoonguy wrote:
We were there six years ago. Crowds were terrible but the scenery was wonderful. I think I blotted the crowds out of my memory, not so with Dubrovnik & Monserrat.
To whom did you reply? Where is there?
home brewer wrote:
For me and my wife it was Plitvice Lakes National Park in Croatia. There were lots of people but rarely did that make a difference. I did have to wait for some shots while the Korean mobs got done with their selfies. I was shooting the d500 with the 18-300mm and many times the other people would emulate my shot with their mobile phones; apparently using a big DSLR makes one an expert.
We were there in late spring 2019. We bought a two day ticket and only used the second day for about an hour to get a few high shots. What I realized later; is that much of the time the sun was in the wrong place with respect to the falls for time of day I was taking the photo. Better planning and a full day sun might have helped. Some of the photos you see on the net appear to be taken by drones.
For me and my wife it was Plitvice Lakes National ... (
show quote)
We were there about six years ago. My memory of the very unique scenery had obliterated the memory of the of the huge throng the day we were there. The walkways were not so bad but the shuttle buses were alarmingly packed.
mflowe wrote:
Acadia is over rated???
Those are quite spectacular.
deanfl wrote:
Most likely everyone has looked forward to visiting famous locations.....and afterwards felt that the photo ops were disappointing or overrated.
For me, Acadia National Park and Monument Valley come to mind. These two are extremely popular and favorites for many. I can’t say I didn’t find good photo ops, just that, overall, they were less than I expected.
I realize the above may be a reflection of a personal shortcoming on my part.
Are there famous locations that you found overrated or disappointing photographically?
Most likely everyone has looked forward to visitin... (
show quote)
I agree on Acadia. Drove 3,000 miles to be there in the fall. Took a handful of pictures.
A friend sent me a photography book on Acadia. I forgot to bring it along but when I got home I checked it again. Eh.
There are some nice photos of Acadia here. Good photographers can make outstanding photos of nearly anything. I’m not suggesting Acadia is bad or ugly and the crowds were minimal. I really liked the one way loop: wish Yellowstone could figure that out. I’m just saying it isn’t up to the western parks.
And I noticed many dissing Zion. It is one of my favorites. I go for at least a week every year. Putting your bike on the bus and then riding back to camp is awesome. Most of the ride you have to yourself except for a passing bus every ten minutes or so. The deer, turkey, and big horn sheep light my fire.
I suspect those who get excited about Acadia haven’t visited the western parks or Pacific coast. IMHO far more photogenic.
..
One of my favorite places a couple hours from home
(
Download)
IDguy wrote:
I agree on Acadia. Drove 3,000 miles to be there in the fall. Took a handful of pictures.
A friend sent me a photography book on Acadia. I forgot to bring it along but when I got home I checked it again. Eh.
I suspect those who get excited about haven’t visited the western parks or Pacific coast. IMHO far more photogenic.
You are exactly right. Thank you for posting.
To the guy going to see Giants’ Causeway, please provide feedback/your thoughts upon return. Truly would enjoy your perspective.
CHG_CANON wrote:
If memory serves, you don't even have to leave the parking lot of the lodge at Monument Valley ...
Merrick Butte by
Paul Sager, on Flickr
Or even the Navajo Park Trading Post parking lot ...
Nothing is photogenic more that 50 steps from your car.
frankraney wrote:
Wow Abo! Great idea. I never thought about that...I would have thought the people would be a weak blur. Thanks for the tip......
BTW..... What did longshadow say how many a Brazilian was....a lot?
He (indirectly) posed the question, not the answer.
cameraf4 wrote:
I get it that others want to go to the iconic places, too. I accept that there will be crowds. But when I am there lining up a shot and someone steps in front of me to "take a selfie", then I have a problem.
I have never been disappointed with any of the iconic places that I have visited. They were almost always everything I expected in terms of photogenic locations. I just have to take a patience pill and put on my "big boy" pants and then I do fine.
Agree completely.
Disappointing for me: Three gorges, Yanghtze river, China, post dam. Oh, it's nice, but no doubt more impressive before the dam was built, given the dam rose the water level 300 feet and you're now cruising effectively on a lake, not a river. Highlight for me was passing through the locks; they are impressive.
mflowe wrote:
Acadia is over rated???
Absolutely beautiful set!
deanfl wrote:
You might have better luck getting people to post ‘great’ Alaskan shots if you said you felt Alaska was overrated or disappointing. It certainly worked for me on Acadia and Monument Valley.
You are right. Nobody in this post answered my challenge about the disappointing dearth of photoscenics in Alaska.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.