vertigo wrote:
Just going through a lot of old files--trying to winnow out the chaff. Found this one
This one is definitely not chaff. I like it a lot. The chair does fight with the model for your attention, but she wins.
Sure am glad you found it!
Beautiful. Great lighting and sensuous pose. Nice friend to have.
vertigo wrote:
Just going through a lot of old files--trying to winnow out the chaff. Found this one
Looked at the posts this week and came across this wonderful image that you created. This is a vary powerful image. The level of control shown by photographer and model is so NON amateurish that one is confronted with here and in other common locations. The stuffed chair is the perfect environment for this pose. The chair and relaxed tension of the pose is perfectly suited to the chair and the chair works as a conduit to sensual expressiveness that the pose reflects.
When I saw the image my mind shot to one of my favorite erotic artists, the painter Balthus*.
That image I added so there would be no mistake, the Title is The Room.
*
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balthus
HOHIMER wrote:
Timmers - Look and learn.
You are truly a shallow person, it gives you such a thrill to disparage the photographer and his work with such a cheap comment. Shame on you!
very nice pose and beautiful model and lighting
There are some people on this forum, more than I like, who delight in negative commentary.
Timmers, it seems to me that you spend an inordinate amount of time defending your posts. When confronted with negative criticism, you cast insults and disparage the person making those comments. Perhaps there's a lesson there that you are failing to notice.
--Bob
Timmers wrote:
You are truly a shallow person, it gives you such a thrill to disparage the photographer and his work with such a cheap comment. Shame on you!
rmalarz wrote:
Timmers, it seems to me that you spend an inordinate amount of time defending your posts. When confronted with negative criticism, you cast insults and disparage the person making those comments. Perhaps there's a lesson there that you are failing to notice.
--Bob
It wasn't my post, it is virtago's post of an image.
The person chose to make a personal attack upon me, rather than following the general guide lines of not abducting others threads, but posting a commenting upon the OP's image. This is not considered correct form, that is abducting the OP's thread and so distracting from his work and effort to openly share his work.
It would appear that you are the one who is out of line adding to this weak attempt at being the bully.
In future try to display some modicum of respect to threads and the OPs and the owner of the thread, you could even open a discussion thread about the Ass Hat Tim and how we all love to hate that despicable cur!
I was just following your lead.
—Bob
Timmers wrote:
It wasn't my post, it is virtago's post of an image.
The person chose to make a personal attack upon me, rather than following the general guide lines of not abducting others threads, but posting a commenting upon the OP's image. This is not considered correct form, that is abducting the OP's thread and so distracting from his work and effort to openly share his work.
It would appear that you are the one who is out of line adding to this weak attempt at being the bully.
In future try to display some modicum of respect to threads and the OPs and the owner of the thread, you could even open a discussion thread about the Ass Hat Tim and how we all love to hate that despicable cur!
It wasn't my post, it is virtago's post of an imag... (
show quote)
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.