Have cameras become too smart
Jan 3, 2020 18:47:46 #
BebuLamar wrote:
I guess your camera was born in Japan but it's a German citizen so it would speak German with a Japanese accent.
This reminds me of my days with the AF stationed at Hickam in Hawaii. A young airman on my team recounted the time he was stationed at Warner-Robins near Macon, GA. He said he was dating a young Japanese lady, who grew up in the area, and it was a hoot to hear her deep southern accent. Growing up in GA myself, I can appreciate his experience.
Jan 3, 2020 18:49:00 #
schaut wrote:
"my little Leica V-Lux 4 " just kinda rolls off your tounge doesn't it?
😎😎😎
Jan 4, 2020 11:53:12 #
JoeJoe wrote:
I was out with a friend at the weekend and the dis... (show quote)
The camera is just the tool a photographer uses to capture his or her vision. The creativity comes from the artist, not the camera. Why would one not desire the most efficient tool available to express their creativity? Having said that, the choice of which camera should match what one wants to shoot. The event photographer has different needs than the landscape shooter.
Jan 7, 2020 08:34:51 #
chippy65
Loc: Cambridge
the cameras are very smart, menus are bewilderingly complicated.........especially so for people who used to carry 2 or more cameras to enable the
use of different ASA / ISO typically 25 Kodachrome to 400 ASA HP4 b&w . Now, in spite of all this sophistication in camera menu choice, lens focal length,
filters etc etc...... why do some photographers insist on subjecting their images to being "Photoshopped" to within an inch of their lives? Can be most misleading
and at worst garish, even painters, who have total control over their media try to resist "overworking" their image to the extent that it becomes unrealistic.
use of different ASA / ISO typically 25 Kodachrome to 400 ASA HP4 b&w . Now, in spite of all this sophistication in camera menu choice, lens focal length,
filters etc etc...... why do some photographers insist on subjecting their images to being "Photoshopped" to within an inch of their lives? Can be most misleading
and at worst garish, even painters, who have total control over their media try to resist "overworking" their image to the extent that it becomes unrealistic.
Jan 7, 2020 08:34:52 #
chippy65
Loc: Cambridge
the cameras are very smart, menus are bewilderingly complicated.........especially so for people who used to carry 2 or more cameras to enable the
use of different ASA / ISO typically 25 Kodachrome to 400 ASA HP4 b&w . Now, in spite of all this sophistication in camera menu choice, lens focal length,
filters etc etc...... why do some photographers insist on subjecting their images to being "Photoshopped" to within an inch of their lives? Can be most misleading
and at worst garish, even painters, who have total control over their media try to resist "overworking" their image to the extent that it becomes unrealistic.
use of different ASA / ISO typically 25 Kodachrome to 400 ASA HP4 b&w . Now, in spite of all this sophistication in camera menu choice, lens focal length,
filters etc etc...... why do some photographers insist on subjecting their images to being "Photoshopped" to within an inch of their lives? Can be most misleading
and at worst garish, even painters, who have total control over their media try to resist "overworking" their image to the extent that it becomes unrealistic.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.