Wider range but lower photo quality for $600 less than the 24-70. The 28-300mm might be an all in one but if you start out with a lens of lesser quality just to cover the range will you end up happy?
kcornman wrote:
Brucej67 wrote:
Wider range, but lacks the quality, slow aperature and is only a DX lens (D600 is an FX camera).
Sorry, I made a typo, should have been 28-300MM, and I fully agree it is not the top of the line glass that the 24-70 is, but he is asking about walk around lenses, that implies to me a wide range of zoom, smaller package, and not heavy to carry.