Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Tamron SP 150-600mm F/5-6.3 DI VC USD G2 (used) ARRIVED! Question for Tamron fans?!?
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Dec 24, 2019 12:44:11   #
whlsdn Loc: Colorado
 
saxman71 wrote:
I own a copy of this lens. Great lens. Use it a lot. I strongly suspect, as have others before me, it's the zoom lock that you are engaging accidentally (although it surprises me a bit you could get the zoom to move at all with the lock engaged). Some folks like this new feature and others do not. The following is from one of the many reviews of this lens I found on-line.

"See Flex Zoom Lock

One of the major updates present is the “Flex Zoom Lock” mechanism.
This is a furtherance of the traditional zoom lock switch available on many high-end telephoto lenses. Instead of using the zoom lock switch as usual, the photographer now has the option to lock in at any at any zoom range simply by sliding the entire zoom ring forward. This not only saves time but also ensures the photographer can intuitively lock zoom without breaking eye contact with the subject."
I own a copy of this lens. Great lens. Use it a lo... (show quote)


OOoooh. This I did not know. I'd thought I ought to go to the Tamron website to see if I could download the manual for this lens, but in my rush to test it, have not done so yet. As often, dumb.

Yes. I just experimented with the lens, and I am confident you folks have been telling me exactly right. However, I was just thinking in terms of my limited experience - the lock switch, which prevents zoom creep when transporting. Obviously, I inadvertently had engaged this Flex Zoom Lock and was fighting it. Hoping I didn't damage the lens, but it is back to working very smoothly. And I'm sure - now that I know it exists - I will learn to appreciate this feature.

Thank you all a bunch on solving my malfunction! Yeah, not a lens malfunction, apparently. User.

Reply
Dec 24, 2019 13:12:50   #
whlsdn Loc: Colorado
 
And on the topic of calibrating my lens: I did buy the Tap-In Console for Canon(TAP-01E) as well. $44 used from KEH at the same time as the lens. The lens appears to function well with either the T6s or the R, so I'm assuming the latest firmware is installed and the Tap-In needn't be used at this point. I also understand that one can make all sorts of adjustments, fine-tuning functions to suit oneself, but that's a sure way for me to get a nice piece of gear royally messed up.

Maybe one day I'll play with the thing. Of course, none of my other current Tamrons are Tap-In compatible, the A005 70-300, the A09E 28-75, and the B008 Di II 18-270.

Reply
Dec 24, 2019 13:13:38   #
linelink
 
It’s scary to think you put down big bucks on something that isn’t working. Then a great feeling when problem solved. Hats off to UHH ‘s with the assist. I have the lens and was about to advise you, but they beat me to it. Have fun with the G2. It’s a fine lens for the money.

Reply
 
 
Dec 24, 2019 14:18:54   #
gasstro Loc: Indiana
 
Nice images. I accidentally locked the zoom with the focus ring one time, thought the lens was broken. Then I read the directions. The G2 has been a great lens for me! Enjoy.

Reply
Dec 24, 2019 14:48:05   #
Race Raccoon Loc: Yankton, South Dakota
 
whlsdn wrote:
Well, I've been hemmin' and hawin' about getting a longer reach quality telephoto for use with both my EOS R and T6s than my old Canon 70-200mm 1:c.8 L IS USM bought used last year. Even with the second hand 1.2x and 2x Canon Extenders, the reach isn't super, and as some here had cautioned, with the 2x image quality suffers a bit.

When I bought my R, I tested a Tamron 100-400 - and a Tamron tech present for Mike's tent sale even performed a firmware update onsite - but AF performance was dismal. So, I had settled on either getting an old Canon 100-400mm with IS or Tamron's 150-600 G2, which was said to perform well with the R. Now, I see on Tamron's website that version 1 AND the 100-400 are claimed to be "Usable after firmware update." Now that I've received a used G2 (rated EX) from KEH, I can confirm that it works just dandy with the R, and I'll attach a couple of backyard photos as evidence. [Following is a short story to go with the photos.]

I've been watching various sources for a suitable deal on a G2, and almost pulled the trigger on one at KEH rated BARGAIN. Dallied, missed, then this EX popped up, I talked it over with the spouse, and made the leap. It didn't hurt that KEH is offering a full year warranty on anything sold in Nov and Dec!

I took the lens out with both cameras on a dim gray day yesterday to try it out, and it worked fine. Until just before I headed home, when the zoom ring got really stiff. It was fairly cold, but only in the 40s, so I thought that shouldn't be a problem. In the backyard today, it was still stiff...until suddenly it wasn't. I had intended to call KEH today and warn them the lens might be coming back. Now I'm unsure. I'm thinking maybe I should just send them an email to describe what happened and warn them I may end up returning the lens. Then wait and see.

What do you think?

Anyway, the story on my sample freehand shots here...again, a really gray day (excuse up front): there were 5 squirrels in the row of trees at the back of our yard, an unusually large gathering. One looks black from a distance. This one dark squirrel kept chasing 3 squirrels away while alternately separating the 5 squirrel in a different direction. That strategy's purpose became clear as he eventually had his way with her while the other 3 looked on from a distance. He's a very distinctive sort of squirrel, methinks.
Well, I've been hemmin' and hawin' about getting a... (show quote)


Your distinctive male is obviously the alpha male in your neighborhood & as such, he gets his way first w/all things including love making, food, deference, etc. The running in line is the group of male squirrels & they run in pecking order, i.e. Alpha, Beta, etc. Also, it may or not be of interest but male squirrels' testes only descend during the active mating period; otherwise they remain safely retracted & invisible until needed. Don't know your location & it depends on the sub species of squirrel, but for most, now is the peak mating season. I have found squirrels to be very entertaining and instructive to study & observe. Thank you for the lovely photos!

Reply
Dec 24, 2019 17:07:55   #
Juy Loc: Delaware
 
whlsdn wrote:
Well, I've been hemmin' and hawin' about getting a longer reach quality telephoto for use with both my EOS R and T6s than my old Canon 70-200mm 1:c.8 L IS USM bought used last year. Even with the second hand 1.2x and 2x Canon Extenders, the reach isn't super, and as some here had cautioned, with the 2x image quality suffers a bit.

When I bought my R, I tested a Tamron 100-400 - and a Tamron tech present for Mike's tent sale even performed a firmware update onsite - but AF performance was dismal. So, I had settled on either getting an old Canon 100-400mm with IS or Tamron's 150-600 G2, which was said to perform well with the R. Now, I see on Tamron's website that version 1 AND the 100-400 are claimed to be "Usable after firmware update." Now that I've received a used G2 (rated EX) from KEH, I can confirm that it works just dandy with the R, and I'll attach a couple of backyard photos as evidence. [Following is a short story to go with the photos.]

I've been watching various sources for a suitable deal on a G2, and almost pulled the trigger on one at KEH rated BARGAIN. Dallied, missed, then this EX popped up, I talked it over with the spouse, and made the leap. It didn't hurt that KEH is offering a full year warranty on anything sold in Nov and Dec!

I took the lens out with both cameras on a dim gray day yesterday to try it out, and it worked fine. Until just before I headed home, when the zoom ring got really stiff. It was fairly cold, but only in the 40s, so I thought that shouldn't be a problem. In the backyard today, it was still stiff...until suddenly it wasn't. I had intended to call KEH today and warn them the lens might be coming back. Now I'm unsure. I'm thinking maybe I should just send them an email to describe what happened and warn them I may end up returning the lens. Then wait and see.

What do you think?

Anyway, the story on my sample freehand shots here...again, a really gray day (excuse up front): there were 5 squirrels in the row of trees at the back of our yard, an unusually large gathering. One looks black from a distance. This one dark squirrel kept chasing 3 squirrels away while alternately separating the 5 squirrel in a different direction. That strategy's purpose became clear as he eventually had his way with her while the other 3 looked on from a distance. He's a very distinctive sort of squirrel, methinks.
Well, I've been hemmin' and hawin' about getting a... (show quote)


For the stiff felling check that you didn't pull the zoom ring back some. It has a lock function that will rrstrict the zoom function when you slide the ring forward or back lo ks and unlo ks at the setting your at. This is seperate from the lock switch which only locks it at the 150 setting

Reply
Dec 24, 2019 17:21:43   #
saxman71 Loc: Wenatchee, WA
 
whlsdn wrote:
And on the topic of calibrating my lens: I did buy the Tap-In Console for Canon(TAP-01E) as well. $44 used from KEH at the same time as the lens. The lens appears to function well with either the T6s or the R, so I'm assuming the latest firmware is installed and the Tap-In needn't be used at this point. I also understand that one can make all sorts of adjustments, fine-tuning functions to suit oneself, but that's a sure way for me to get a nice piece of gear royally messed up.

Maybe one day I'll play with the thing. Of course, none of my other current Tamrons are Tap-In compatible, the A005 70-300, the A09E 28-75, and the B008 Di II 18-270.
And on the topic of calibrating my lens: I did buy... (show quote)


If you are getting results you are satisfied with, I personally would not mess around with the tap-in. And I haven't.

Reply
 
 
Dec 24, 2019 21:13:06   #
whlsdn Loc: Colorado
 
saxman71 wrote:
If you are getting results you are satisfied with, I personally would not mess around with the tap-in. And I haven't.


Right, keeping it for future developments...whatever they might be. Thanks.

Reply
Dec 24, 2019 21:16:05   #
whlsdn Loc: Colorado
 
Race Raccoon wrote:
Your distinctive male is obviously the alpha male in your neighborhood & as such, he gets his way first w/all things including love making, food, deference, etc. The running in line is the group of male squirrels & they run in pecking order, i.e. Alpha, Beta, etc. Also, it may or not be of interest but male squirrels' testes only descend during the active mating period; otherwise they remain safely retracted & invisible until needed. Don't know your location & it depends on the sub species of squirrel, but for most, now is the peak mating season. I have found squirrels to be very entertaining and instructive to study & observe. Thank you for the lovely photos!
Your distinctive male is obviously the alpha male ... (show quote)


I'm in Colorado, and I was surprised to see this was an active mating season for them. And if they are not chewing into one's attic and gnawing on wiring and such, they're entertaining to have around. And fun photo subjects on a cold cloudy winter day.

Reply
Dec 24, 2019 21:17:59   #
whlsdn Loc: Colorado
 
linelink wrote:
It’s scary to think you put down big bucks on something that isn’t working. Then a great feeling when problem solved. Hats off to UHH ‘s with the assist. I have the lens and was about to advise you, but they beat me to it. Have fun with the G2. It’s a fine lens for the money.


Indeed! I'm hopeful that's all there was to it. Seems to be it.

Reply
Dec 24, 2019 21:20:31   #
whlsdn Loc: Colorado
 
gasstro wrote:
Nice images. I accidentally locked the zoom with the focus ring one time, thought the lens was broken. Then I read the directions. The G2 has been a great lens for me! Enjoy.


Good to hear I followed a good example. Well, at least to start with. Without the manual to read, I only stumbled upon the solution, and even then did not know what I'd done to resolve the problem. Much better to know what happened and why.

Thanks all!

Reply
 
 
Dec 24, 2019 21:21:21   #
whlsdn Loc: Colorado
 
It's also good to hear this lens was a good selection! Thanks for the encouragement.

Reply
Dec 25, 2019 13:33:02   #
pedroho
 
allow me to spoil the party, see this?

https://photographylife.com/reviews/nikon-coolpix-p1000?utm_source=Photography+Life+Newsletter&utm_campaign=20d9018ba7-newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_74d1711c3d-20d9018ba7-183960933

Reply
Dec 25, 2019 23:56:27   #
whlsdn Loc: Colorado
 


Well, I'd have to interpret that review a little differently than you apparently did.

Indeed, I pondered getting one of the super-zoom cameras as an alternative to buying an expensive telephoto to use on an expensive camera I already own. The idea has some merits, in my mind. A 600mm's max zoom, even if I use it with my crop-sensor T6s instead of the FF EOS R, falls far short of this very expensive (maybe even) king-of-superzoom all-in-one shooters, the Coolpix P1000 for getting TIGHT on a distant subject, I guess. Some of that is effect from the tiny sensor of that Nikon, is it not? A sensor which cannot produce a better quality image than many cell phone cameras (according to the referenced reviewer)...which, I admit, have gotten surprisingly decent.

In fact, I talked extensively with a retired pro photographer - who now works, when he wants to, selling camera equipment, knives, and camping gear in a nearby Jax store - about this topic. Being an avid hiker, he's really happy to have switched to one of the less expensive superzooms, and he competes successfully - in a friendly fashion - with fellow photographers in his local photo club. But the 8X10 print samples he showed me did not persuade me that I'd be happy with the occasional sizable enlargement hung on my wall of a shot I'd taken of the Grand Canyon, or eagle in flight, or bighorn sheep on a promontory. Fantastic close-ups on my Facebook page or Smugmug website? Better chance, yes.

pedroho, should you want to send me your P1000 to test on my early March 2020 photo outing to Page, AZ with a photographer friend from CA, I would be most happy to prove myself wrong. And before one of the sages here tells me I should have rented both the P1000 AND the 150-600mm G2 first in order to make a really well-informed decision, I will say up front, "Yes, I should have." Had I only moved so thoughtfully though all 76 years of my life to date.... well, I can only imagine what might have been different.

Reply
Dec 26, 2019 03:23:25   #
Pistnbroke Loc: UK
 
Check with the seller if they removed all the tap in figures at re set it to zero. It could have a nice set of tap in offsets already loaded or a bad set or not .

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.