Using photo’s from the gallery.
DirtFarmer
Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
JohnSwanda wrote:
... it's useful to have knowledge beyond kindergarten.
Since I made it through graduate school I wholly agree.
It's always good to be in danger of learning something new.
Why is it some of us can offer offbeat humorous and pithy commentary and everyone accepts that it is tongue in cheek, while others of us get, let's say 'critiqued.'
bleirer wrote:
Why is it some of us can offer offbeat humorous and pithy commentary and everyone accepts that it is tongue in cheek, while others of us get, let's say 'critiqued.'
Wit requires wits.
Some people are naturally witty while others could not tell a joke if their life (or our vote) depended on it.
bleirer wrote:
Now that's funny.
Especially because it's unintentionally so, methinks.
artBob wrote:
Especially because it's unintentionally so, methinks.
No, it was intended to be witty. You failed the test.
JohnSwanda wrote:
Fair Use may be confusing and open to interpretation, but I can't see any way it would cover printing someone's photograph and displaying it in their home.
Fair use doesn't exactly protect that, but it also pretty much doesn't care. Sure, I would prefer someone pay me for a print. Sometimes I tell a person who has admired a work and is "deserving" (not enough space to quantify here) that I could send a hi res file for them to print just for their own personal enjoyment.
If someone lifts something of mine and prints it for their own use, so what? As long as I am not suffering financial or personal reputation damage, copyright doesn't much protect me. Nor, do I care.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.